|
Shelbyville, Tennessee ~ Thursday, August 7, 2008
| Blogs |
|
|
Intersection safety
Posted Saturday, April 19, 2008, at 2:44 PM<< Previous | Read comments | Respond | Email link | Next >>
Should homeowners with trees, shrubs or bushes blocking the sight of motorists at intersections to the extent of being a hazard be ordered to keep them trimmed or else have them cut down?
Comments Showing comments in chronological order [Show most recent comments first] |
Hot topics Another Tony tantrum(7 ~ 7:52 PM, Aug 2)
Victim's Rights
More annoying tv commercials
Appointment time should mean something
Two on the 4th
|
Yes! This comes from someone who has been in an accident before directly because of a bush blocking my view.
Bo,
As you know, I live in Plano, Tx. (north of Dallas) and several months ago, letters were sent out to homeowners concerning trees obstructing the view of motorists and hanging over sidewalks. The letters gave the homeowners a certain amount of time to get them cut or they would be fined. I know that if yards are not kept cut, the city will cut them for you and add the cost to your utility bill. I know that I have a neighbor that I have called and complained to the city because of high grass and after a very few days, the grass is cut. The city told me that the homeowner is usually very cooperative because they don't want their water turned off. It seems to work here in Plano except some people push it to the limit.
YES YES YES....If the home owner can not keep the tree's or bushes cut back,...then someone else should be able to step in and do it for them with a charge....I want go as far as cutting their grass but for the safety of everyone being able to see while pulling out into traffic then it should be taken care of.
I thought that was already the case.
If people are picky about their trees and bushes,bringing in their own arborist is better than being fined in order to pay for creating witch's brooms or otherwise maiming the plants.
The city or one's neighbors might not have any agenda but increasing safety if they perform any necessary trimming or removal of dead greenery.
The right to grow a meadow of native flowers ends with the other fellows' right to have visibility while driving,unimpeded utility lines,etc.
The first thing that should be looked into is whether the homeowner is unaware of the problem or too poor or ill to attend to it.
The elderly,the indigent and other overburdened folk may lack the means of getting yardwork done.
That's when an offer from friends or agencies could really come in handy.
Give them a way of saving face while their surroundings are made safe and attractive and the homeowner,the yard doctors and the community all benefit.
I always thought that the city had X number of feet from the street anyway... the "right of way". Seems like if a thick bush is too close to the street, the city should be able to cut it down. I could be wrong on this, though.
Yes!
The city should just cut them back. Its a lot easier to get forgiveness than permission anyway.
About that "right of way" thing, it doesn't get mowed out in the country unless its spring show or horse show time. With gas going up, I doubt it it'll improve anytime soon....