*
David Melson

Healthy debate over presidency

Posted Tuesday, November 27, 2007, at 6:37 AM
Comments
View 4 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • For us, health insurance is a love/hate relationship. It is a constant battle to stay on top of and they deny the smallest item, while charging high rates, but without it I might be paralyzed from the waist down now or have died from one of my four heart attacks.

    My Canadian friends and associates do not seem to like their state funded program. Their taxes are high and they feel like they get second-rate health care.

    I guess I would rather pay high insurance rates than to put the money into high taxes where I don't trust the politicians to use it as they should.

    -- Posted by stevemills on Tue, Nov 27, 2007, at 7:24 AM
  • What the government should be focusing on is high medical costs and insurance fraud that is running rampant in this nation. If they would stop that then that would help lower premiums for everyone and more people could afford it. Also, I went to the doctor the other day and was charged $100 just for me to talk to a PA (not even the doctor) for a whole 2 minutes and pretty much had to diagnose myself. I don't see how that can be worth $100? I think they charge that high amount because they knew the insurance would cover it and especially when they listed it as an emergency visit when it wasn't.

    -- Posted by jaxspike on Tue, Nov 27, 2007, at 8:32 AM
  • Exactly... Insurance fraud is a plague of this nation. What do you know, those same companies usually discuss drug prices and coverages.. It's no wonder those are two of some of the most influential lobbyists on Capitol Hill.

    -- Posted by darrick_04 on Tue, Dec 4, 2007, at 3:42 PM
  • Health coverage is abysmal compared to just a few years ago.

    Competent,caring professionals who try to maintain certain standards are thwarted at every turn and feel apalled and helpless in the face of the dangerous deterioration of medicine today.

    People aren't getting enough education in how the system works or how to look after their own well-being.

    Who has the time or inclination to insure that an adequate patient history as been taken?

    Who sees that the patient understands the doctor's instructions and is able to comply?

    Who insures that the right diet,meds,therapy and equipment are supplied and utilized?

    When people don't get wellness services,don't have daycare for sick children (or a way to stay home and care for them),don't have the luxury of staying off work to recover from illness or injury and don't get the necessary rehabilitation for war wounds,job injuries,birth defects,geriatric problems,etc. then the rest of us pay for tons of cure or loss of productivity when an ounce of prevention or amelioration could improve people's quality of life to an infinite degree.

    As much as health issues have changed,it seems as if we could afford the efficient,humane treatment of our people that did exist a decade or so ago.

    With the aging of America,the increase in diversity of our population,the ever-growing number of health risks from drug-resistant diseases,environmental hazards,biological attacks from evil-doers,etc.,we can't afford to be callous or lax in our health care.

    The problem we ignore when our neighbor suffers can and will effect us as well.

    We can either pay a few pennies to make sure that we have the care we need when cardio-vascular disease,slipped discs, cancer,depression,glaucoma,hearing loss,shingles or whatever threaten-or we can pay the much higher costs of losing our optimum quality of life and impairing the lives of those around us in the process.

    Can we afford to have people in office who can't or won't aid and support the implementation of real solutions to the convoluted issues that confront us?

    -- Posted by quantumcat on Tue, Dec 4, 2007, at 7:34 PM
Respond to this blog

Posting a comment requires free registration: