David Melson

How far should state's rights go?

Posted Wednesday, March 31, 2010, at 2:40 PM
View 8 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • It will be interesting to see the administration's response.

    -- Posted by stevemills on Wed, Mar 31, 2010, at 3:58 PM
  • How about follow the constitution? Leave the feds only the power given to them in the constitution and leave all other power to the states, or to the people...You know, just like it says in the 10th amendment.

    -- Posted by quietmike on Wed, Mar 31, 2010, at 5:35 PM
  • I have a sneaky feeling that our senators and congressmen have no idea what is even in our country's constitution.

    -- Posted by cherokee2 on Wed, Mar 31, 2010, at 5:42 PM
  • I have about decided that folks have forgotten that we live in the United STATES of America and the the FEDERAL states of America. If the federal government keeps taking everything over we might as well get rid of the states. I agree with quietmike, the Feds need to read and follow the constitution.

    -- Posted by Sharon22 on Wed, Mar 31, 2010, at 9:23 PM
  • Unfortnunately, David, your question is worded improperly. The question shouldn't be "How far should state's rights go?" It should be "How far do the powers of the federal government go?"

    The individual states should be governing themselves and the federal government is there for specific purposes. Anything beyond those purposes is the responsibility/right of the individual states to take care of. That's the whole point of the 10th Amendment.

    -- Posted by Thom on Thu, Apr 1, 2010, at 1:00 PM
  • Unfortunately I don't know how to spell "unfortunately".

    -- Posted by Thom on Thu, Apr 1, 2010, at 1:08 PM
  • State rights exist only in theory. Contrary states are usually brought into line with carrots (ironically enough, their own carrots), but the stick has been very effective at times. The 10th means nothing at all, and its rhetorical nature represented only a saving of face in exchange for the selling out of individual state independence upon ratification.

    -- Posted by memyselfi on Fri, Apr 9, 2010, at 3:51 AM
  • Do you assign this "rhetorical" description to any other amendments?

    -- Posted by quietmike on Fri, Apr 9, 2010, at 3:54 AM
Respond to this blog

Posting a comment requires free registration: