Login | Register
Partly Cloudy ~ 57°F  
[Shelbyville Times-Gazette]
Shelbyville, Tennessee ~ Wednesday, December 3, 2008
Blogs
World Turned Upside Down !
Posted Thursday, June 26, 2008, at 6:07 PM
<< Previous | Read comments | Respond | Email link | Next >>

It seems that the whole world has turned upside down , and I don't mean the polar shift or whatever that thing that is suppose to happen in 2012.

The Middle East is a powder keg fixing to explode,gas is going through the roof, food, famine, weather and this election is unreal.

I truly believe that America is in God's plans because our nation does the most to spread the gospel to the whole world with missionaries and T.V. and books and all other ways.

We may not be a "Christian " nation now , but we once were. Israel turned it's back on God and the rest is history , are we next?

Kudos to Tennessee for defining the only acceptable form of marriage as between one man and one woman and there is a bill in the senate to make that the law of the land , I pray it passes.

People trying to pass laws to stop parents from spanking their kids, PLEASE!

Like my parents told me , God put extra padding back there for that reason.

The main question I have , Is Obama a Muslim or not?

If elected I guess we will know by what he swears in on.

It is a shame to say that is still enough racism in this country that if elected how long will he stay alive.

Before the comment is made that I am racist, I don't see skin color when it comes to people.

As far as the homosexuals go , the color don't matter either , it is still wrong in my eyes and according to God , his to.

These next 4 years till 2012 are going to be exciting to say the least, maybe it is the birthing pains before the great tribulation that may start in 2012.

The global i.d is on the way.


Comments
Showing most recent comments first
[Show in chronological order instead]

I am a little confused... Email me, darrick_04@yahoo.com if you lost it.

-- Posted by darrick_04 on Wed, Jul 9, 2008, at 11:00 PM

Darrick,

Nope that wasn't it at all, I had to pick stuff up. Your manager wanted to call you up and I told her No need. I didn't want to interrupt anything that was going on. BTW someone called me last week and I am a little worried as I tried to call them back but their voicemail was full and they never answer. Could you please see if they are ok?

-- Posted by Evil Monkey on Wed, Jul 9, 2008, at 9:59 AM

Do you have one or are you content on just critisizing someone who does have a belief and wish to bring them to your point of no belief?

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Wed, Jul 9, 2008, at 9:31 AM

You know, isn't it fun not getting answers? Basically this is what this Blog is all about, Michael says something retarded and you start fights the entire time saying how people are wrong because they don't believe how you two do. Did you know you two are going to hell for all your blasphemy?

-- Posted by Evil Monkey on Tue, Jul 8, 2008, at 10:47 PM

I do not want anyone to believe me. It is the Gospel I desire anyone to believe.

If I were to go to hell it would be the will of my God of which I could accept. I, as a sinner, would deserve no less. I have faith though in His Word and in His plan of salvation that the blood of Jesus is a sufficient sacrafice that will appease Him. I know beyond a shadow of a doubt where my eternal soul will be and I am joyous.

I have to assume from your comment that you at least believe there is a hell. If you want us to believe in you, tell us what could keep a man out of hell in your opinion?

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Wed, Jul 9, 2008, at 8:12 AM

I just wonder if they have even met in person? Btw EM, sorry I didn't get to talk to you at my work the other day.. We were busy! Due to my college class I have to rush into work at 1, so I barely have time to catch up on anything.. So I wasn't trying to be rude. Hope all is well :)

-- Posted by darrick_04 on Tue, Jul 8, 2008, at 10:57 PM

What is not there?

You know, isn't it fun not getting answers? Basically this is what this Blog is all about, Michael says something retarded and you start fights the entire time saying how people are wrong because they don't believe how you two do. Did you know you two are going to hell for all your blasphemy?

-- Posted by Evil Monkey on Tue, Jul 8, 2008, at 10:47 PM

Evil Monkey,

What is not there?

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Tue, Jul 8, 2008, at 2:01 PM

Why do you continually try to read into something that clearly isn't there.

-- Posted by Evil Monkey on Tue, Jul 8, 2008, at 9:44 AM

memyselfi,

I believe he fulfilled the entire Law. The Law was a shadow of the substance to come which was Jesus. The Law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ. I do not belive we would recognize sin in our life if not for the Law that points.

Only Faith in the sacrafice of Christ alone will appease the God I know.

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Tue, Jul 8, 2008, at 9:13 AM

I don't sin.

-- Posted by Evil Monkey on Mon, Jul 7, 2008, at 11:14 PM

That would explain why you do not need a Resuurrected and Living Christ.

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Tue, Jul 8, 2008, at 8:53 AM

parkerbrothers, Well, I do actually understand the difference between the two days. I was more or less asking you if you observe the Sabbath, and why or why not? If He fulfilled that, what parts exactly do you believe have been fulfilled or has all of the law?

As far as my opinion, I do not really have one on the issue, just wondering what you think.

-- Posted by memyselfi on Tue, Jul 8, 2008, at 12:16 AM

I don't sin.

-- Posted by Evil Monkey on Mon, Jul 7, 2008, at 11:14 PM

Evil Monkey,

I do not think everyone is doing it and if they were that would not make it right for anyone including me. It is wrong to steal or lie just as it is to commit adultery. The good news is there is forgiveness for all of the mentioned sins to a repentant heart wanting to be free of the sins.

The sins I find hardest to rid myself of is the one of not loving the Lord thy God with all my heart, and with all my soul, and with all my strength, and with all my mind; and my neighbour as myself. I find it hard to even grasp hold of it for a minute of my life let alone to have never broken it once in my life. Even though I do not believe it is humanly possible to fulfill that commandment until we are changed in the twinkling of an eye I will keep trying to commprehend and grasp a hold of it as best I can until that day.

What sins do you struggle with most?

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Mon, Jul 7, 2008, at 6:46 PM

parkerbrothers,

I have pointed out Stealing and Lying quite a bit lately, but you seem to shrug it off as a sign of the times. Because everyone seems to be doing it? Is that right? What is the difference? Could it be because you were caught doing it?

-- Posted by Evil Monkey on Mon, Jul 7, 2008, at 3:44 PM

Divorce is more widely accepted than homosexuality

Posted by nascarfanatic on Sun, Jul 6, 2008, at 3:53 PM

Though I may not approve of it there are grounds for divorce given in the Bible. I do not think any Christians like the thought of divorce either but realize it is acceptable in circumstanses unlike the sin of sodom.

The good news is there is forgiveness for both of the mentioned sins to a repentant heart wanting to be free of the sins.

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Sun, Jul 6, 2008, at 6:30 PM

nascarfanatic,

Sorry you feel the way you do but I can not change what I know to be true.

I am not obsessed with the sin of homosexuality. The sin of homosexuality has chosen to come forward at this time asking for acceptance. I had nothing to do with it staying in nor out of the closet.

It does strike a nerve with you though that I wish did not happen. I ask you to understand my position on it as I do yours. I feel you are entitled to your promotion of it like I want you to accept my disapproval of it in society as a norm. We all are not going to agree on things but at least we can try to respect each others efforts.

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Sun, Jul 6, 2008, at 6:21 PM

Parker, your old age thinking doesn't resonate with people with open minds. So stop trying. You claim to teach what Christ wants everyone to know, but you have YET to let Christ do it... You are a stumbling block to the pathway of salvation. YOU get in the way with your OWN ideas of what is/isn't wrong... You can try to childishly equate homosexuality with adultery or whatever you wish.. Yet you say NOTHING about half of all marriages ending in divorce, the astronomical amount of KIDS with NO place called home, the unprecedented amount of people living in poverty in this "the richest nation on Earth"... etc.

I have yet to see anything other than pure talk from you. Every time I see the "Quiz an Expert" section in the paper, I wonder how you enjoy that undeserving title... You have YET to show me where JESUS said a thing about homosexuality, or where God for that matter. I don't need Bible lessons either because there is a verse that states very clearly the "Sins of Sodom" and not a SINGLE one had a thing to do with being gay... Jesus (not Paul, not Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, or any other IMPERFECT human being...) never said ONE WORD about this topic you have become obsessed with.

Divorce is more widely accepted than homosexuality, because we ALL know people who have been divorced or cheated on... Which involves heartache, bitterness, and resentment, yet we choose to stir up the same emotions among homosexual couples who do not experience any of that. How absurd of you to continually place yourself in Jesus' shoes and say things that HE NEVER SAID. You continually talk about this Christian path you so dearly love, yet half of everything you say goes 100% against Christ.

You and Michael are the only two who continue to bring it up... Yet you don't want the issue "crammed down your throats" no pun intended... Here is a dose of common sense, if YOU don't want to hear anything pertaining to homosexuality, then by all means STOP BRINGING IT UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

-- Posted by nascarfanatic on Sun, Jul 6, 2008, at 3:53 PM

Evil Monkey,

Sorry you still misunderstand what I am trying to say. The point I am trying to convey to you is that all the other types of sins you mentioned do not have people trying to demand they have the right to live in them and not be recognized as sin. If anybody did then I think you would see equal emphasis given to those.

As I stated earlier if all the people living in adultery wanted to come out of the closet and change everyones view of that sin as being acceptable and they were trying to aquire the right to be married to every woman whom they claimed to love at the same time then you would see an equal rebuttal to that request.

I feel no one is picking on the sin of homosexuality anymore than the sin of homosexuality is picking on time.

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Sun, Jul 6, 2008, at 12:27 PM

"I have not noticed you being "so fast" or even slow either to respond to topics. Was that something you want everyone to take notice of for you and why would it really matter?"

Actually, if you don't remember, you accused me of always talking to everyone like i have all the time in the world. So stop being a senile idiot and look for things to complain about. So if someone has an answer for you, you seem to attack any part of their nature. You an idiot.

You love to argue about everything because you hate to be wrong, sad fact is, you are wrong. About alot of things, You state homosexually is being generalized as acceptable therefore he points it out. But you neglect to mention, assault seems to be in the paper alot more, drugs, lying, stealing, and hypocrisy. Seems like that is left out quite a bit.

-- Posted by Evil Monkey on Sun, Jul 6, 2008, at 8:43 AM

However, if you are up for it, I would also like to get a feel of where you stand on the Sabbath vs. the Lord's Day. That is a great conversation in my opinion, and also exactly what you believe has been fulfilled by Christ. They are related subjects to me anyway, but have consequences that cast long shadows.

Posted by memyselfi on Tue, Jul 1, 2008, at 5:30 PM

memyselfi,

Sabbath versus Lord's Day :

In general I think the Sabbath is the last day of the week which is Saturday in my mind but actually it originally was considered from sunset on Friday night until sunset on Saturday night. I have thought it was a day of rest intended for man but exploited by legalist.

I consider the Lord's Day to be currently recognized as the first day of the week which is Sunday which originally was recognized as starting at sunset on Saturday and ending at sunset on Sunday. Most Christians recognize it as the day Christ rose from the grave and the day the early Christians came together to break bread lay aside as they prospered which has become part of the typical church service.

Fulfillment by Christ:

Primarily he fulfilled the Law. Secondarily he fulfilled many prophecies.

What do you think He fulfilled?

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Sun, Jul 6, 2008, at 8:24 AM

I read the article, I read the verses too. What I discern from it is, If you point out certain classes of people, with certain sins: You are in fact judging them. If you state sin, instead of point out specifics then people seem to be more receptive to you. The problem is singling out people for specific sins yet when someone points out yours, it's not a big deal.

I think that is why alot of people get pretty ticked off at you and Michael. Sin in general is bad, but when you proactively go after certain types of sin, it seems like it's ok to do the other types that you two seem to never mention. I think that is where most of my trouble leads to not agreeing with 85% of what is said.

-- Posted by Evil Monkey on Fri, Jul 4, 2008, at 1:53 PM

I think you are sometimes missing the whole point. The only reason a particular sin has been pointed out or made the topic of so much discussion is because that particular sin (homosexuality) itself is what is asking for widespread general acceptance to not be considered sin.

I truly think you would see the same thing happen if adultery was the subject sin that wanted public acceptance. I believe Michael would have the same stance against it if every adulterous man came out of the closet and wanted to be allowed to be married to each and every mistress he had claiming he had a right to be married to each woman he loved.

God desires Marriage to be between one man and woman in this current dispensation of time. We will not have marriage in the next dispensation of time which is eternity.

We currently do not have a national emergence of adulterous men coming out of the closet and making their desire to be allowed to be married to each and every mistress an issue. Rest assurred that our interpertation of scripture would remain the same and we would give it equal billing as a sin if it does occur. It just is not an issue seeking justification now like the sin of homosexuality is.

Can you see that it is not us picking out a sin but instead it is a particular sin picking its time???

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Sun, Jul 6, 2008, at 7:38 AM

Evil Monkey,

I have not noticed you being "so fast" or even slow either to respond to topics. Was that something you want everyone to take notice of for you and why would it really matter?

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Fri, Jul 4, 2008, at 2:54 PM

I read the article, I read the verses too. What I discern from it is, If you point out certain classes of people, with certain sins: You are in fact judging them. If you state sin, instead of point out specifics then people seem to be more receptive to you. The problem is singling out people for specific sins yet when someone points out yours, it's not a big deal.

I think that is why alot of people get pretty ticked off at you and Michael. Sin in general is bad, but when you proactively go after certain types of sin, it seems like it's ok to do the other types that you two seem to never mention. I think that is where most of my trouble leads to not agreeing with 85% of what is said.

No idea why you keep telling me to chill, like I have stated over and over, I do not get anger or upset over anything anyone says; am not like everyone else in the world. BTW the reason I can answer and response to topics so fast is not by searching, but by utilizing feed-readers. If you don't know what that is, do research on RSS.

-- Posted by Evil Monkey on Fri, Jul 4, 2008, at 1:53 PM

Chill, monkey, chill. Read the article on judging again. Look at the content of it instead of worrying about the author. You might catch on to something.

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Fri, Jul 4, 2008, at 12:13 PM

So instead of focusing on others' sins, why don't you work on yours and let Jesus stand on his own? Or since you feel the need to judge others, are stating you and Michael are Jesus?

-- Posted by Evil Monkey on Fri, Jul 4, 2008, at 10:00 AM

When I see the waters,I see the place where our sins reside.

Posted by quantumcat on Fri, Jul 4, 2008, at 1:41 AM

quantumcat,

That is what I see also.

24But the ship was now in the midst of the sea, tossed with waves: for the wind was contrary.

25And in the fourth watch of the night Jesus went unto them, walking on the sea.

26And when the disciples saw him walking on the sea, they were troubled, saying, It is a spirit; and they cried out for fear.

27But straightway Jesus spake unto them, saying, Be of good cheer; it is I; be not afraid.

28And Peter answered him and said, Lord, if it be thou, bid me come unto thee on the water.

29And he said, Come. And when Peter was come down out of the ship, he walked on the water, to go to Jesus.

30But when he saw the wind boisterous, he was afraid; and beginning to sink, he cried, saying, Lord, save me.

31And immediately Jesus stretched forth his hand, and caught him, and said unto him, O thou of little faith, wherefore didst thou doubt?

32And when they were come into the ship, the wind ceased.

33Then they that were in the ship came and worshipped him, saying, Of a truth thou art the Son of God.

In the above verses I see Jesus above sin with it under his feet and control. I see Peter stepping out of the boat on faith. I then see Peter loosing focus on faith and temporarily relying on his self when he sees the boisterous wind that drove the water representing sin. I see Peter realizing that faith in Christ allowed him to walk above sin and that he would drown in his sin if he relied on his own efforts. I at last see the eternal non failing gift of salvation stretch forth it never loosing hand of grip on the faither.

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Fri, Jul 4, 2008, at 8:29 AM

The waters can represent any of our challenges.

God has the power to eliminate evil and harness everything else.

We need not fear any part of His creation but can deal with it with respect and even delight.

We are not to become complacent,smug or cavalier in how we face the world but neither are we to face it with despair,

We should trust that all things come together for good for those who love the Lord.

Even Chaos and entropy are part of His goodness.

God's plan has good be the default setting.

When we place our faith in Him,we are choosing to restore our lives to His design specifications.

Will we have everything in our lives accomodate our druthers?

No.

But,we will find more to like in a lifestyle based on purpose,true chivalry and truth.

We won't just be saving our lives,avoiding trouble and increasing our prosperity.

Our comfort and how we are viewed by others become less consequential than whether we are putting our talents to their best use as part of God's team.

Ironically,when we quit "running on empty" and become our true selves,we will be given the means to be happy.

Immortality and avoidance of Hell will matter less than the Heaven we begin to know even here and now.

Folks who can't look past "Rescue the Perishing" forget that Christ doesn't just offer to lengthen our existence.

He adds depth and breadth,as well.

When I see the waters,I see the place where our sins reside.

They haven't been tossed where they might return to shore but into the depths where they are forgotten.

They are as far from us as the east is from the west.

"We are at our best when we prepare for the worse, we hope for the best, and we accept what it is that comes."

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Wed, Jul 2, 2008, at 6:10 PM

I agree with this.

I also think we need to think about second stage faith.

We focus on the campaign and the election but we forget about holding office.

We get giddy about "landing" a sweetheart,having the courtship and wedding then we let the story fade to black.

Being born again is rather like being born the first time.

It's a begining-not a final chapter.

The early stages may find one somewhat weak and helpless.

The next may find one a little too confident and unaware of his limits.

As a person grows,things that were once beyond him become easy.

He becomes embarassed to think of how ignorant and incapable he was in earlier days.

If a teen tried to resume the life of an infant,he'd become bored and uncomfortable.

We don't all mature the same way spiritually any more than we do physically.

In both cases,we grow best when we are well-nourished and avoid injury,illness and other stresses that might stunt our development.

We would do well to recall that those who take longer to reach adulthood tend to develop more fully than those who end their childhood quickly.

But,if the physical life is more about what comes between our birth and death,so is our spiritual existence.

We need to start making a middle to go with the begining and the end.

We need to make that fresh start,get prepared for the finale then start concentrating on adding some flash to "the dash".

How can we put God at the center of our lives if we don't bother to make one?

-- Posted by quantumcat on Fri, Jul 4, 2008, at 1:41 AM

quantumcat,

We are at our best when we prepare for the worse, we hope for the best, and we accept what it is that comes.

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Wed, Jul 2, 2008, at 6:10 PM

"See that Guy walking on top of the water,dividing the waves and calming the waters?

Posted by quantumcat on Wed, Jul 2, 2008, at 3:33 AM

quantumcat,

What do you think the waters represent?

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Wed, Jul 2, 2008, at 6:00 PM

Again with the life jackets.

Instead of fussing about the rising tide,why not say:

"See that Guy walking on top of the water,dividing the waves and calming the waters?

Latch onto Him.

You won't drown so long as He's there to lift you up."

There's nothing wrong with people being prudent but people who obsess about preparing for the worst may overlook the best.

Let's not put all our focus on Ebola,global warming,disappearing bees,the Tri-Lateral Commision and in-coming asteroids.

Let's acquire a Friend who can not only get us through the bad times and rejoice with us when things are idyllic but is just good to have around any time.

Let's love God as if what He could do for us didn't matter.

Let's love Him as if maybe we could be of use to Him.

Let's value Him for Himself and not just for how we can use Who and What He is to our advantage.

-- Posted by quantumcat on Wed, Jul 2, 2008, at 3:33 AM

Parker

Lets pray every thing falls into place for them. Need to leave have a good day.

-- Posted by jesse sellers on Wed, Jul 2, 2008, at 12:32 AM

It bothers me also that although they be treading the most dangerous waters there will be those even posing as Christians trying to convince them that the water is calm and shallow and not to worry and just drift with the flow when Niagra Falls is just minutes away. The art of deception by the none other than the deceiver himself.

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Wed, Jul 2, 2008, at 12:26 AM

That would probably help but they do not seem to want help or believe they are in need of help.

I feel sometimes that talking to one of them makes about as much sense as throwing a lifejacket to someone standing in the middle of Wal-Mart parking lot. Until they feel they are in dangerous waters there is no perceived need of the life jacket by them.

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Wed, Jul 2, 2008, at 12:19 AM

Maybe they need to read the book of Jasher it tells of an additive they could put in their fuel tank to help that.

-- Posted by jesse sellers on Wed, Jul 2, 2008, at 12:09 AM

Nascarfanatic gets unstuck sometimes for brief periods of time. I think a lot of it has to do with what octane he is running on?

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Tue, Jul 1, 2008, at 11:59 PM

Yep.

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Tue, Jul 1, 2008, at 11:49 PM

Parker

Seems like they are still running the old time holly, remember being told how they would stick.

-- Posted by jesse sellers on Tue, Jul 1, 2008, at 11:43 PM

nascarfanatic,

I know you are just as curious as the monkey but you have to understand it would just not be fair to anyone to disclose any facts until it is determined that all facts are known within a reasonable degree. We are not at that point yet. But very close. Just idle down a little.

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Tue, Jul 1, 2008, at 9:14 PM

Evil Monkey,

I believe you are still avoiding the question?

# 22 - "Tell me about this Jesus you know and where did you learn of him??????????????????????"

Remember, I am not the first one to ask this of you and you could not answer them either. No question will ever go away without an answer. That is a rule of time.

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Tue, Jul 1, 2008, at 9:10 PM

hahaha, oh has someone else seen it too?

-- Posted by Evil Monkey on Tue, Jul 1, 2008, at 8:46 PM

I really do not see why you even bother to comment on the subject of sin when you believe Paul to be "Paul the Fraud" and put Jesus in the same boat with Santa Claus.

It seems clear that any discussion we have on the subject of sin is going to come from two different sources.

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Tue, Jul 1, 2008, at 6:35 AM

Ironically enough you can remember a comment from many months ago, but when someone asks you about your ACTIONS from just a few weeks ago, you are mum on the subject? Interesting... Pointing others out for a few words, but hiding behind the Lord when your actions contradict your rhetoric... Hypocrite much?

-- Posted by nascarfanatic on Tue, Jul 1, 2008, at 7:43 PM

Oh!!

I'am sorry. I would have never guessed.

Yes, A little salt in a open wound will usually wake us up.

Now you wouldn't put words in my mouth I didn't say would you.

-- Posted by jesse sellers on Tue, Jul 1, 2008, at 7:23 PM

Sabbath vs. the Lord's Day

what you believe has been fulfilled by Christ.

memyselfi, those are great topics I would like to hear on too.

-- Posted by Momof3&3step&1gran on Tue, Jul 1, 2008, at 7:17 PM

Jesse,

What you don't like a little salt with your sermon? Hmm I believe you said it was ok, but now it isn't? So now when the shoe is on the other foot, there is a problem?

I am a Christian? Weird, I never said that.

-- Posted by Evil Monkey on Tue, Jul 1, 2008, at 6:19 PM

parkerbrothers, Hmmm, I dont know where to start. Firstly, as you already know, I do not really have an opinion that would have the same urgency or importance as most other people here. I do however think that if I did, I would most likely lean toward the likelihood of the destruction of the soul according to critical scripture. I would also doubt the literal representation of "the Hell" in certain books of the Bible that tend to be written with fantastic imagery that, as the centuries have passed, have lost some of their original intended purpose for most readers.

In a couple of the newer subjects there are references to the new style of the church. I have heard no one defend the church yet, but I think the church has no other way to counter the basic knowledge that is so readily available in todays society. A church has not only the objective of getting the good news out and saving souls, it also has the earthly problems of a budget, maintenance, paying the bills, ect. Churches need members to do any of this. If you could talk to leaders of most churches in an honest way, I would bet that all would agree some of their members will end up in hell. At what point does a pastor, preacher, minister, priest draw the line? If every church drew the line based on a single way of accepting the religion, most would be forced to shut the doors because they would not have the members to keep them open. Everyone does have a different God at this point in history. The different churches are just trying to find their place in this new world.

I hate to say it, but throughout time knowledge and organized religion have been somewhat at odds. There are so many ways to interpret passages (not to mention translations, councils, bulls, history or traditions) that to have any cohesion in a group, it has to have a leader to lead and the followers to follow. In my opinion, it was no accident the Bible was not widely distributed under organized religion until recently. It was rooted in the desire to keep the power structures of the time in place. I am not saying that the motivation was necessarily selfish. There were many that truly believed that deviation from "the church" was a sin and that anyone who questioned needed a "correction" from a loving Christian. It was after all for their own good.

Anyway, sorry I got off on that, back to what I think about words. There is no definitive way to explain how Hell (or Heaven for that matter) has been translated from the original words. I fear that the heleniziation of the area took forever the true meanings of what we see as our Bible today. I doubt it was intentional, but even in our lifetime we have seen words change meanings. That does not even begin to account for different languages/cultures and centuries of time.

I will very seldom resort to mining scripture and would certainly not on this subject as there is way too much ammunition for either side. I just wanted to know if you also looked as hard at these more troubling words. However, if you are up for it, I would also like to get a feel of where you stand on the Sabbath vs. the Lord's Day. That is a great conversation in my opinion, and also exactly what you believe has been fulfilled by Christ. They are related subjects to me anyway, but have consequences that cast long shadows. Sorry I went on so long...

-- Posted by memyselfi on Tue, Jul 1, 2008, at 5:30 PM

Monkey

You are teaching me well, showing me how to be a new type of Christian by your actions.

Aren't you proud of me.

-- Posted by jesse sellers on Tue, Jul 1, 2008, at 4:52 PM

Actually Yes I did and you confirmed it previously, You just choose to keep changing the subject because you don't want to admit you are a liar, a thief, and a hypocrite. And everyone knows it.

-- Posted by Evil Monkey on Tue, Jul 1, 2008, at 3:02 PM

memyselfi,

Your question is quite a bit more challenging than monkey's and will require some thought. As you probably already know hell is also a general word used for many translations. I hope to be back from my 3:00 appointment in time to respond to you tonight. In the mean time tell me your thoughts on the word.

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Tue, Jul 1, 2008, at 2:57 PM

Evil Monkey,

No, you have never answered my question. I do not think you can and I think I know why you can not.

# 21 - "Tell me about this Jesus you know and where did you learn of him?????????????????????"

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Tue, Jul 1, 2008, at 2:53 PM

Nicely worded memyselfi, Seems to happen alot eh.

parkerbros,

Haven't avoided the question, I have already answered it MANY times. I just got sick of answering it over and over. So why do you steal and lie then never seek to retify the issue, instead there is always an excuse? Why do you alway seek to protect your image when it seems the only way to do that is with smoke and mirrors? Doesn't Satan do that very same thing? But you stated you worship Jesus, but didn't the Bible say to follow Jesus' example?

-- Posted by Evil Monkey on Tue, Jul 1, 2008, at 12:28 PM

parkerbrothers, I find the language of the bible fascinating and worthy of much more study than it is usually given. I do agree that the specific word "judge" has been misinterpreted at times, but I wonder if you have the ability to take such an open-eyed look at other words that are even more questionable and have more meaning to the overall understanding of scripture. I would like to hear what you think of the different words translated into "soul" "Hell" and a few others.

It is one thing for a person to accept biblical contextual criticism when it adds to and justifies their beliefs, but when it does not align with tradition, it is somewhat harder to accept for most.

-- Posted by memyselfi on Tue, Jul 1, 2008, at 12:01 PM

Evil monkey,

No, you have never answered my question you like to avoid.

# 20 - "Tell me about this Jesus you know and where did you learn of him????????????????????"

Some of you guys seem to know of a different Jesus and God that does not resemble the one in the Bible.

Actually all of yours sounds pretty good. You might could convert me to this "real truth" if you were not trying to hoard him all up for yourself. Share this knowledge you have unless you are like the gnostics and think it is secret knowledge.

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Tue, Jul 1, 2008, at 11:38 AM

parkerbrothers,

I have answered your questions over and over and if you cannot seem to remember them, that is your problem. But to answer the same thing repeatedly seems like a waste of time and breath. Therefore there is no point. Because no matter what, you will always argue your pointless rhetoric just to get the last word in. Thing is, you can't win due to your sins and blasphemy. I, on the other hand, have no need to sin.

-- Posted by Evil Monkey on Tue, Jul 1, 2008, at 10:16 AM

Jesse,

You stated that you need to babysit me? Then why do I feel I need to keep you all in line with the real truth instead of you sad comments to try and put me down? How Christian of you.

Posted by Evil Monkey on Tue, Jul 1, 2008, at 6:55 AM

Evil monkey,

Your above post to Jesse sparked a couple of questions in my mind for you. What is the "real truth" you know? Where did you learn of this "real truth"?

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Tue, Jul 1, 2008, at 7:40 AM

Evil Monkey,

I always try to answer a question if I see one. Most questions are followed with the ? symbol. If you have a question ask a question and I will try to answer it if I can. If I can not answer it I will tell you so.

While on the subject of questions let me ask you again one that I have asked each time with a question mark that you most definitely have avoided for the longest: # 19 - "Tell me about this Jesus you know and where did you learn of him???????????????????"

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Tue, Jul 1, 2008, at 7:21 AM

nascarfanatic,

Irregardless of where you think I got the great article did you get a better understanding of the wreckless use of the word "judge"? That is what really matters.

I think it clearly shows that there is more to the word "judge" than Mathew 7:1 which every one wants to take out of context and use the word when things do not go their way. In light of other scriptures in Mathew, John, First Corinthians, Timothy and Titus I think it can be determined that we are actually called to judge by discernment.

As I was just sitting here it dawned on me what a waste of time it is to explain any of this to you when you believe almost everything in the above mentioned books was written by a fraud named Paul. Perhaps all is not in vain if someone else gets a little something out of it.

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Tue, Jul 1, 2008, at 7:09 AM

parkerbrothers,

You didn't answer the question, you always avoid it. Yes I do not proactively go out of my way to sin. I have self-control, nothing around me affects me nor my thoughts to sin. It's that simple, you seem to hide behind the veil of religion to justify it is ok for you to do anything you want because you feel you are "saved". That is blasphemy. You always need to keep bringing up little quips of what people stated in the past but can't seem to answer the questions now. I don't think it is fair that you condemn nascarfanatic over an analogy that you have twisted into your own fantasy tactic. If Jesus is so powerful, then let him do his job. Why do you feel you need to defend him? Are you hiding something?

Jesse,

You stated that you need to babysit me? Then why do I feel I need to keep you all in line with the real truth instead of you sad comments to try and put me down? How Christian of you.

Michael,

So if you found out one of your children's teachers was a homosexual, what would you do? You state that you will try to save the new morals that are coming around? Do you honestly believe you can stop a movement of what 90% of the world already states is ok with them? Why do you feel that so many people are leaving Church? It is because of the mentality of some of the teachers, they can't seem to get out of the 13th century.

-- Posted by Evil Monkey on Tue, Jul 1, 2008, at 6:55 AM

michaelbell,

I also will admit I am not without SIN!

Actually the closer I am drawn to a pure and perfect God the more I see sin in my life.

I also realize that until the "twinkling of an eye" occurs I will struggle with sin in my life but am constantly reassurred that I have an advocate to stand before me.

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Tue, Jul 1, 2008, at 6:45 AM

nascarfanatic,

As you could see if you would look, my comment was to evil monkey that... "You are no more sinful than the rest of us" in which he responded and said..."Sorry I don't lie, cheat, steal, maim, or blaspheme. I have confidence, it isn't about self-centeredness."

I really do not see why you even bother to comment on the subject of sin when you believe Paul to be "Paul the Fraud" and put Jesus in the same boat with Santa Claus.

It seems clear that any discussion we have on the subject of sin is going to come from two different sources.

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Tue, Jul 1, 2008, at 6:35 AM

I for one will admit I am not without SIN!

I know enough to accept Jesus as my Saviour!

But I still do not have to accept the changes in morals coming around and will fight it all I can.

To try to give my children a decent place to live and play.

-- Posted by michaelbell on Mon, Jun 30, 2008, at 9:47 PM

Let's cut to the chase.

Any here without sin?

Any here who would meet God face -to-face and treat Him as our fellow bloggers are being treated?

Any who want to want to lead the lost lamb to the comfort of the barn or are we all stocking up on mint jelly?

The way I heard it,none of us are perfect.

We all need redemption and we all need to try to support one another instead of just promoting our opinions.

It's one thing to try to help someone avoid a pitfall. It's another to work over time digging holes and sharpening stakes in hopes that someone would be unwary enough to stumble and fall.

-- Posted by quantumcat on Mon, Jun 30, 2008, at 9:43 PM

The Pharisees were a confident group also. They, like you, thought they had no sin and therefore was not in need of a Savior. He stood in front of them and they never saw Him just as the Word is before you today and you do not see nor hear it.

You seem desirous of seeing a crucifixion much like them also. Why?

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Mon, Jun 30, 2008, at 8:16 PM

Wow... So in other words, you accuse Evil Monkey of thinking he doesn't sin, but you have yet to admit you copy and pasted an article as if it were own thoughts (which is illegal, as noted)... Defended Michael's fictitious ordainment, hit a man, beat a man, and put a man in a hospital, and have not ONCE said I'm sorry.. just defended YOURSELF, and yet EM is the one who acts like he doesn't sin.... Please..

-- Posted by nascarfanatic on Mon, Jun 30, 2008, at 8:40 PM

Sorry I don't lie, cheat, steal, maim, or blaspheme. I have confidence, it isn't about self-centeredness.

Posted by Evil Monkey on Mon, Jun 30, 2008, at 11:12 AM

Evil Monkey,

The Pharisees were a confident group also. They, like you, thought they had no sin and therefore was not in need of a Savior. He stood in front of them and they never saw Him just as the Word is before you today and you do not see nor hear it.

You seem desirous of seeing a crucifixion much like them also. Why?

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Mon, Jun 30, 2008, at 8:16 PM

"You are no more sinful than the rest of us."

Sorry I don't lie, cheat, steal, maim, or blaspheme. I have confidence, it isn't about self-centeredness.

The difference between you and I are, in fact, I am not hiding behind a religion to justify my actions as a hypocritical individual that is more self-centered than any other human being on the planet. You justifications are ludicrious to even dare state you feel my beliefs are.

The Real Truth: You copy and pasted it in direct violation of their copyright information, it states there right on the bottom of the page, You even copied the mispellings. You didn't even give them credit for it. Not only did you steal, you are now lying about it.

-- Posted by Evil Monkey on Mon, Jun 30, 2008, at 11:12 AM

Parkerbrothers,

Jesus wept because of your ignorance. You stole, yet again use the 3rd grade tactic of avoidance.

The so-called POINTS you keep trying to make are pretty funny as you keep stumbling around to show how sinful I am. Keep commenting, it is hilarious to watch you squirm in your chair with discontent as you try to come up with something witty and original.

-- Posted by Evil Monkey on Mon, Jun 30, 2008, at 8:15 AM

Evil Monkey,

I am not denying my ignorance but Jesus wept for other reasons. If you believed the Word of God presented in the Bible you would know why he truly wept.

I did not steal the information. The person I received it from used it in a sermon on the word "Judge". He is a contributer to Personal Freedom Outreach and receives their quarterly publications. They see the same uprising of people who want to use the word "judge" everytime someone points out a sin that is displeasing to God.

You are no more sinful than the rest of us. We are all born with the self centered human nature. That is a fact. Just as God has a wrath and anger toward the sin we all have is a fact. The difference between you and I relies on the fact that I believe in a Jesus that came out of the tomb and conquered death and is an attonement for my sins and you choose to not believe this and take your stand with denial and claim that Jesus did not rise from the dead and that God does not have a wrath and anger for which only a Living Jesus can appease.

I, too, have to get busy today and do not want to see you wasting time checking your lines on here. I suggest you troll on over to the other sites and drop lines there in hope of catching you something. It will be late today before you need to check your bait on here.

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Mon, Jun 30, 2008, at 9:23 AM

Trying to confuse stright talk with adovidance.

Gave you the verses now demonstrate your 3rd grade tatics on us. Confuse them.

I have to leave,sorry I can't set home and baby set you today.

-- Posted by jesse sellers on Mon, Jun 30, 2008, at 8:41 AM

Jesse,

So why are you condemning Christians? How am I persecuting Christians, show me where.

Basically so, it is ok for you to steal, lie, cheat, kill, blaspheme, and you call yourself Christian? Oh my, the hypocrisy. You should really follow what the verses that you keep thinking pertain to me.

Parkerbrothers,

Jesus wept because of your ignorance. You stole, yet again use the 3rd grade tactic of avoidance.

The so-called POINTS you keep trying to make are pretty funny as you keep stumbling around to show how sinful I am. Keep commenting, it is hilarious to watch you squirm in your chair with discontent as you try to come up with something witty and original.

-- Posted by Evil Monkey on Mon, Jun 30, 2008, at 8:15 AM

Monkey

Again No fear, No hate just sadness from me,Parker,and Pastor Mike for your group.

Again, no matter how they try to justfy their actions, Romans tells us what God has already done concerning this group.

Romans 1:25-32 Romans 2:1-5

The key word to look for in verse 1:28 is reprobate mind.

This group has always hated Christians, even back in Roman times, and part of the future prophecy of persecuting the Christians as you are now demonstrating.

-- Posted by jesse sellers on Mon, Jun 30, 2008, at 7:19 AM

jesse sellers,

And you see why He wept.

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Mon, Jun 30, 2008, at 7:09 AM

JESUS WEPT.

-- Posted by jesse sellers on Mon, Jun 30, 2008, at 4:44 AM

It's funny how you twist this YET AGAIN stating God's wrath and anger when I am referring to Michael's HATE-mongering and FEAR-mongering towards certain classes of people. Your interruptation of what God has classified sin is thousands of years old. GROW UP.

Did you know it was illegal to post an article without permission or stating where you got it from? Did you know that was stealing? It even states that at the bottom of the page. Oh I guess that doesn't pertain to you. Right?

Michael,

"I will tell you that it is not cotton candy or fuzzy ducks, the church is full of that.

I will give you a hint , the first letter is S!"

Wow, What thoughts go into your head and even on a Sunday after Church, it must be the Holy Spirit filling you up, or was it the buffet? You're so Christian is makes me want to be JUST LIKE YOU!

-- Posted by Evil Monkey on Sun, Jun 29, 2008, at 11:57 PM

And by the way Evil Monkey, this is what Christ came to save us from. The wrath of God to come.

He came in the flesh, was crucified, buried and rose from the dead. He conquered death. He is alive contrary to your beliefs that you want people to accept.

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Sun, Jun 29, 2008, at 7:42 PM

Evil Monkey,

I received the beautiful article from a friend of mine and everything in it checks out as accurate and to the point. I hope people learn that they can not use the word "judge" everytime someone says something that does not sit well with them.

Calling homosexuality a sin is not nitpicking by no means either. Entire towns got roasted to the ground because of the seriousness of it and I sense there may be a repeat soon.

Revelation talks of the coming:

6And the seven angels which had the seven trumpets prepared themselves to sound.

7The first angel sounded, and there followed hail and fire mingled with blood, and they were cast upon the earth: and the third part of trees was burnt up, and all green grass was burnt up.

AND:

5And the angel took the censer, and filled it with fire of the altar, and cast it into the earth: and there were voices, and thunderings, and lightnings, and an earthquake.

AND:

8Therefore shall her plagues come in one day, death, and mourning, and famine; and she shall be utterly burned with fire: for strong is the Lord God who judgeth her.

AND:

8And the fourth angel poured out his vial upon the sun; and power was given unto him to scorch men with fire.

9And men were scorched with great heat, and blasphemed the name of God, which hath power over these plagues: and they repented not to give him glory.

AND:

18By these three was the third part of men killed, by the fire, and by the smoke, and by the brimstone, which issued out of their mouths.

And some of you do not believe God has a wrath and anger??? Who has deceived you?

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Sun, Jun 29, 2008, at 7:35 PM

I agree , the same way you cannot be homosexual and claim to be a Christian and claim to be saved.

It just don't work that way.

We better hope and pray that God has all the mercy that the Bible says he does or we are all in deep trouble.

Oh and by the way I don't live a lie I talk the talk and walk the walk to the best of my ability.

And everything is forgiven except for blasphemy against the Holy Ghost and I have not done that.

I guess our opinions of Christians are different.

In my next blog I give you a teaching on the 120 years of man and what the church is missing now.

I will tell you that it is not cotton candy or fuzzy ducks, the church is full of that.

I will give you a hint , the first letter is S!

Till then Be Blessed!

-- Posted by michaelbell on Sun, Jun 29, 2008, at 7:30 PM

Michael,

Never said you were a troll. And answering a 3 questions and living a lie doesn't get you eternel life. You can't walk into church and praise jesus, then walk out and rob a bank just because you think you are saved. Just doesn't work like that.

Jesse,

What i just said above is called repentance. Not what you stated.

-- Posted by Evil Monkey on Sun, Jun 29, 2008, at 6:05 PM

If I am to be called a Troll then if I remember correctly there was three questions mine would be.

Who do you serve?

By what merit do you enter Heaven?

Why should you enter?

In case you don't know the answer.

It is Jesus Christ to all three if you answered correctly you may pass, if not well you know the place to go.

-- Posted by michaelbell on Sun, Jun 29, 2008, at 5:45 PM

Copy and pasting lol, can you please come up with your own stuff?

Your source: http://www.pfo.org/notjudge.htm

I believe Michael is a false teacher therefore stood up to correct him; also, who seems to be nitpicking.

-- Posted by Evil Monkey on Sun, Jun 29, 2008, at 4:22 PM

What do we do? Do we judge -- don't judge? It seems Matthew 7:15 is clear that we can judge the message and fruit of false apostles. However, Jesus is saying in Matthew 7:1 that we should be careful in nitpicking and judging people's motives or eternal destiny. Ultimately only God is the judge of those things. The mystery clears up when we realize that the word "judge" can be used in different ways in different contexts. Understanding the context is the key to interpreting what kind of judging we are speaking about.

Consider first the Greek word Krino, translated judge in Mathew. If you look at a concordance of the King James Version, you will find the word has been translated: conclude, condemn, damn, decree, determine, esteem, ordain, think and then judge 87 times. Other Greek scholars say that Krino means to call in question, conclude, decree, esteem, determine, think and sentence. From all of this I think it would be safe to say that the word our Lord used means to condemn or to pass judgment upon someone maliciously; while the context shows that we have the responsibility to properly evaluate a thing or an act.

An illustration might be a house in poor maintenance. We can see the paint peeling and the broken windows but would we condemn the owner as lazy? Suppose that the owner was an invalid or just too poor to have it fixed? We must be careful about judging without facts or beyond the obvious. Such judgments are condemnations and these are what Jesus condemned in Matthew 7:1. The Pharisees were notorious for judging based on silly rules and traditions and not the Scriptures.

Peter, Paul and John did a lot of judging the right way. Every second epistle is a judgment on apostasy. In 2 Timothy 4:10, Paul judges and warns about a man named Demas. In the same epistle (2:17) he warns of the heresies of two others by name. Paul did a lot of judging and evaluating when it came to false teachers. We are mandated to judge false doctrine.

Jesus in John 7:24 says: "Do not judge according to appearance, but judge righteous judgment." Jesus is saying "judge without maliciousness and by all means have the facts." To find a balance between legalism and mysticism we must judge righteous judgment.

First Corinthians 6:3-5 demands that we judge certain matters. We can judge the overt and gross sins mentioned later in verse 9. However our judgment must always be tempered with a desire to restore, not punish. The goal is restoration.

On a larger note, we can judge qualifications for ministry. We are given in 1 Timothy 3:1-7 a number of qualifications for eldership. Qualifications are external and we can judge certain externals. Is an elder hospitable, a good teacher, the husband of one wife and so on? Negatively, is he argumentative, or does he have a bad reputation or is he easily angered? These things are easy to see and evaluate.

We can judge qualifications, however we cannot judge qualities. Qualities are internal motivations known only by God Himself.

In John 21:16-17, Jesus said, "Peter, feed my sheep." The feeding of sheep has to do with external qualifications. We can evaluate a man's sermons, appraise if he has studied and researched. Lack of preparation will become obvious in time. Poor doctrine or overtly false doctrine is obvious.

But Jesus also said in John 21:15-17, "Peter, do you love me?" This has to do with qualities and internal motivation. Does a man feed the sheep for power? For prestige? For money? Only God knows the motivation. Or is he doing it out of love for Christ? Again, only God knows. If the person is living an ostentatious and lavish lifestyle, those externals all say something and may be an obvious outworking of the inner motivation.

The book of Titus deals with external qualifications for ministry while 1 Timothy 4:16 tells the pastor to judge himself, to take heed to himself, that is, be aware of his inner motivation, his inner qualities.

It does help us to see and understand the difference between the unseen inner qualities and motivations and the external qualifications which can be judged.

Krino changes according to the context. Sometimes you judge, sometimes you do not. We must not be censorious but we cannot give up our right to a careful discrimination when that is required. The first five verses forbid censoriousness; and the sixth verse insists upon a careful discrimination.

So it is always right to judge false teachers and false teaching using the Word of God as the standard. Nitpicking is one thing. Removing rotten fruit is another. We must be discerning in our discernment and always proceed on the basis of truth and facts leaving the unknown areas of motivation to God.

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Sun, Jun 29, 2008, at 2:42 PM

The surgeon uses the blade to separate the sound tissue from the dead that the diseased portion might not destroy the healthy parts.

The gardener divides clusters of plants that they might be spread over a greater area.

The baker splits the dough into several loaves and covers them that the good life within them might help them increase beyond their original source and that no toxic agent could poison them or hamper their growth.

The enemy seeks to cut us into small pieces he can devour easily.

The Lord divides that we might conquer.

Let us be careful about who is dividing and why.

Some of us may think that because we have not been bound to the tracks by a villain with a top hat and mustache that we can't be pushed off the platform by an innocent-looking bystander.

Some of us may think it is the Mounties' duty to effect such rescues and we'd just get punched out for making a commuter miss his train.

Some of us may hear a whisper suggesting that freight trains would not be a hazard if someone blew up the rails.

Perhaps,the safest course of action would be to heed the warning signs,check out the schedule,make sure you're on the right track,have your ticket in hand,leave behind any baggage you don't need and make a point to enjoy the ride.

-- Posted by quantumcat on Sun, Jun 29, 2008, at 12:29 PM

Jesus is the Word and the Word is the Sword and the Sword is a Divider.

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Sun, Jun 29, 2008, at 9:26 AM

Parker

Jesus said, I'am come not to bring peace, but divison. Father against son,and Mother against daughter --- ect.

I'll bet that one will cause some debate.

-- Posted by jesse sellers on Sun, Jun 29, 2008, at 9:15 AM

I f there was an oncoming freight train coming towards you and you did not see it, would you be offended if I did not warn you?

I am just giving the warnings and signs , if you don't heed them , that does not effect my salvation , just yours.

-- Posted by michaelbell on Sun, Jun 29, 2008, at 9:07 AM

jesse sellers,

I, like you, am simply amazed at some of the comments from people. Where did they learn of such a God that they talk about. Satan must have published a manual for them that we do not know about.

Satan, not being content to be a part of God's Kingdom and deserious of having his own, has set up a rather large following here on earth of deceived followers.

He has taught them well. Let a Christian tell someone about the Savior that was given to save them from the wrath to come and they in harmony will scream "judge". He has deceived them into mis-using that word rather well. Just mention the impending wrath against sin and they again sing in harmony the word "hatred".

Things today are still a lot like then. The Word of God stood in front of them in the flesh and they would squeal. The Word is a Sword. A Great Divider.

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Sun, Jun 29, 2008, at 8:44 AM

If God don,t judge, why was satan removed from heaven along with a 1/3 of the angles.

Is there not going to be a white throne judgement?

I guess not if God don't judge.

Pastor Mike, I guess your profession is no longer needed in this world. The message you give is teaching suppression to the way of life that we want. It's wrong to teach God's message of love,and judgement, because God will not Judge.

satan has it all worked out. (No judgement)

Sorry, Pastor Mike I guess men of your profession are out of work. See warning people of what we believe is coming to them is hate, and not what God's instructions are for you to do.

Now I also have some ocean side land for sell out in New Mexico.

-- Posted by jesse sellers on Sun, Jun 29, 2008, at 2:45 AM

rebelrose, you are one of the few that does not criticise and judge the others on these blogs. I respect you for that. We all have the right to disagree with others, but doing it in criticism is not the way as far as I am concerned. Why do some people think that is ok?

-- Posted by bratgirl1216 on Sat, Jun 28, 2008, at 9:26 PM

You might be committing the worst sin of all, and that is blaspheming Jesus and God with this type of talk.

Posted by Evil Monkey on Sat, Jun 28, 2008, at 8:33 PM

EVIL MONKEY,

Tell me about this Jesus and God you know and where did you learn of them?

You have said your Jesus is dead and I have told you mine is alive.

Mine is a Savior and conquered death.

Yours can not be a savior since death defeated him. Still, tell me about him. Tell me about what you believe in instead of what you do not believe. Sing me a song about Jesus.

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Sat, Jun 28, 2008, at 9:02 PM

Evil Monkey,

Those 5 things you posted above from Michael. I positively believe those also.

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Sat, Jun 28, 2008, at 8:48 PM

Evil Monkey,

You did not read what I said. You read what you wanted to hear.

I said he tells you what he positively believes, not that he tells you everything positive.

Go back and reread the post I made and your error will become clear. But wait, I will post it for you. Here it is: "He post what he positively believes in."

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Sat, Jun 28, 2008, at 8:43 PM

parkerbrothers,

Actually you failed to mentioned that I have told "numerous" people. They listened, they understood, but you cannot seem to understand. You failed to allow yourself to read anything of what I said, instead you pick tidbits and twist them into your own fabrication. Over a year? Think you need to learn how to tell time, the blogs haven't even existed here that long. If you don't like what I comment, then you don't have to read it. Constitution works both ways and luckily it wasn't written by extremist zealots.

People know what I believe by my actions.

Lets looks at the so-called positive beliefs are you crediting Mr. Bell with:

1) Israel turned it's back on God and the rest is history.

2) Kudos to Tennessee for defining the only acceptable form of marriage as between one man and one woman and there is a bill in the senate to make that the law of the land , I pray it passes.

3) The main question I have , Is Obama a Muslim or not?

4) It is a shame to say that is still enough racism in this country that if elected how long will he stay alive.

5) As far as the homosexuals go , the color don't matter either , it is still wrong in my eyes and according to God , his to.

This is all about Fear and Hate; whether he says it is his or not why even bring it up? There are people that think outside of the box, they are not closeminded as you all seem to be. You push your beliefs so hard on people that they want no part of it because they know it is false. You just want the attention and in honestly, You might be committing the worst sin of all, and that is blaspheming Jesus and God with this type of talk.

And btw, you sir are the troll. And I really think you have some fantasy about me since you feel the need to follow me around on the internet stalking me and what I say. If I were gay, I would find it flattering.

-- Posted by Evil Monkey on Sat, Jun 28, 2008, at 8:33 PM

michaelbell,

So right you are. Many churches have become trapped into having to tickle the ears to keep what they think is the church going. The last church age has become lukewarm. They try to walk a line where they avoid issues. They try to be neither for nor against everything. They try to find a middle ground that will please everyone. They forget though who is the I AM.

14And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God;

15I know thy works, that thou art neither cold nor hot: I would thou wert cold or hot.

16So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spue thee out of my mouth.

17Because thou sayest, I am rich, and increased with goods, and have need of nothing; and knowest not that thou art wretched, and miserable, and poor, and blind, and naked:

18I counsel thee to buy of me gold tried in the fire, that thou mayest be rich; and white raiment, that thou mayest be clothed, and that the shame of thy nakedness do not appear; and anoint thine eyes with eyesalve, that thou mayest see.

19As many as I love, I rebuke and chasten: be zealous therefore, and repent.

20Behold, I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me.

21To him that overcometh will I grant to sit with me in my throne, even as I also overcame, and am set down with my Father in his throne.

22He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches.

Only more proof that the season is upon us. Rejoice and look up. We are one day closer than yesterday and tommorrow we may be one day closer than today.

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Sat, Jun 28, 2008, at 8:31 PM

This goes both ways, He is destroying someone else's views and he is destroying what someone else believes in.

Posted by Evil Monkey on Sat, Jun 28, 2008, at 6:34 PM

Evil Monkey,

He post what he positively believes in. You do not have to read it or respond to it negatively if you believe differently. You could just pull up lines and troll onto to the next spot.

Find something to believe in and positively tell us what you believe. I for one have heard enough of what you do not believe and would find it refreshing to hear of something you believe in.

For over a year numerous people have asked you to tell them about your Jesus and God you know and for you to tell them where you learned of them.

I have told you about mine so many times you say I am a "one tune" man. Play us your tune Monkey. We would listen to it with anticipation.

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Sat, Jun 28, 2008, at 8:08 PM

http://www.onenewsnow.com/Business/Defau...

Thought I would share this article.

The book of Revelation talks about the 7 churches of Asia.

It also means the 7 church ages.

This is proof that we are in the last days for the last church is Laodecia which gets spit out like a big lugie.

Churches are doing all they can to get attendance up and getting people to feel good without being good.

When my church comes into existence I don't care whether there is one or a thousand and one there THE WORD OF GOD WILL BE PREACHED!

The chips will fall where they fall if people don't agree go to one on the churches that dish out cotton candy and give fuzzy ducks in their services

-- Posted by michaelbell on Sat, Jun 28, 2008, at 7:53 PM

"Answer: Simply put, we have differing views. I would like to see you take your views and everyone who shares them to a place where you support (positively) what you believe in and not try to destroy (negatively) what someone else believes in. You are very good at condemning someone else beliefs but are lacking it stating and standing up for your beliefs."

This goes both ways, He is destroying someone else's views and he is destroying what someone else believes in.

And how do I lack in standing up for my beliefs? Do I lie? Do I maim? Do I decieve? Am I quick to anger? Do I condemn others whom I do not know? Do I go out of my way to strike fear and hate into others hearts? I want you to ask those same questions. I got out of my WAY to lead a good life, to be an example. And you try to vilify it because you believe the wrong things. My ACTIONS speak for me, I do not need to profess anything. Can you say the same?

-- Posted by Evil Monkey on Sat, Jun 28, 2008, at 6:34 PM

Evil monkey,

You keep referencing a question on this blog I have not answered for you and I could not think of what question you were talking about so I went through this entire blog and found all your questions and will answer them one at a time below. If I have missed one please let me know so I can calm you down. Here goes.

Evil Monkey question 1: How about a nice heap of boo hoo?

Answer: No thanks, you can have it all.

Evil Monkey question 2: Why do you cry injustice when you feel your boyfriend is being picked on?

Answer: Don't have a boyfriend. As you should know by now I am repulsed at even the thought of the sin of homosexuality. You can have it all also.

Evil Monkey question 3: And what do you mean load your boat?

Answer: Simply put, we have differing views. I would like to see you take your views and everyone who shares them to a place where you support (positively) what you believe in and not try to destroy (negatively) what someone else believes in. You are very good at condemning someone else beliefs but are lacking it stating and standing up for your beliefs.

Evil Monkey question 4: Are you stating something that isn't true?

Answer: Not that I know of.

If I have missed a question of yours on here please let me know what it is so I can help you.

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Sat, Jun 28, 2008, at 6:21 PM

Evil monkey,

You keep referencing a question on this blog I have not answered for you and I could not think of what question you were talking about so I went through this entire blog and found all your questions and will answer them one at a time below. If I have missed one please let me know so I can calm you down. Here goes.

Evil Monkey question 1: How about a nice heap of boo hoo?

Answer: No thanks, you can have it all.

Evil Monkey question 2: Why do you cry injustice when you feel your boyfriend is being picked on?

Answer: Don't have a boyfriend. As you should know by now I am repulsed at even the thought of homosexuality. You can have it all also.

Evil Monkey question 3: And what do you mean load your boat?

Answer: Simply put, we have differing views. I would like to see you take your views and everyone who shares them to a place where you support (positively) what you believe in and not try to destroy (negatively) what someone else believes in. You are very good at condemning someone else beliefs but are lacking it stating and standing up for your beliefs.

Evil Monkey question 4: Are you stating something that isn't true?

Answer: Not that I know of.

If I have missed a question of yours on here please let me know what it is so I can help you.

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Sat, Jun 28, 2008, at 6:18 PM

parkerbrothers,

Well on the internet, trolling is something totaly different. Now it's ok for me to go from blog to blog, but before I was advising people? If you notice 90% of my comments were asking questions. I guess asking questions is opposing someone's view? Coming from you, I can understand you way of thinking. One more thing, What haven't contributed to this blog? Not like I expect an answer since you don't have the ability to think for yourself.

And, you still haven't answered the previous questions. Have you noticed the trend?

-- Posted by Evil Monkey on Sat, Jun 28, 2008, at 5:44 PM

The Bible says only the Father knows the hour and day but "we" should know the season.

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Sat, Jun 28, 2008, at 5:04 PM

You don't even know what trolling is, why do you continually take it out of context. Oh wait I know why, You're ignorant and close-minded.

-- Posted by Evil Monkey on Sat, Jun 28, 2008, at 8:37 AM

Though the word trolling in reference to the internet has several ranges of meaning, both you and I know the general meaning well enough to know you are trolling from one blog to the next to the next to the next. As I told you, I have no problem with you doing it. I actually admire the amount of time you have to devote to it. These discussions would be rather boring if everyone thought exactly the same way. Though I do not agree with hardly anything you say I enjoy seeing the other side of things from your oppossing point of view.

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Sat, Jun 28, 2008, at 5:01 PM

rebelrose,

If Christ is a Savior, what does he save us from?

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Sat, Jun 28, 2008, at 4:17 PM

Michael,

I've been surprised at how many times you reference 2012.

We should be wary of predictions. The Bible says that only God himself knows the end of times. All we should focus on is that the time is at hand. Live our lives for Christ and spread His word as if today is the last day.

-- Posted by pleasebenice on Sat, Jun 28, 2008, at 2:00 PM

Jesse,

Then why don't you stop sinning?

-- Posted by Evil Monkey on Sat, Jun 28, 2008, at 1:58 PM

Monkey

That's your terminology. It's called SIN!

-- Posted by jesse sellers on Sat, Jun 28, 2008, at 1:10 PM

Michael,one thing you might have to deal with in your future congregations are people who stay so busy sniping at one another that they distract from fellowship and study much as squabbling children disrupt a classroom.

Even IF there is no true malice behind it,the energy spent on the gibes is that much that's not used to team up and accomplish positive things.

See if you can't find a place where people have gotten off-track due to a few attention addicts and apply your mediation and leadership skills to getting them to work in tandem or,at least.getting the people they drive off to hang around and participate while they do the dozens.

Deeds speak louder than words.

Cheryl has helped place pets.

Steve's people have gone home with plants as well as good information.

Let people see some projects you're involved in and they can join you in applying faith instead of just hearing about religion.

After all,we do a lot more toward keeping our hearts in good shape when we get out and play the game ourselves versus listening to commentators on the radio.

-- Posted by quantumcat on Sat, Jun 28, 2008, at 1:09 PM

Repent from what, Jesse? For having the correct view?

The world according the you, Michael, parkerbrothers:

talking with others is consider trolling,

having friends and meeting others is wrong, having the same tastes and enjoying talking about things is wrong,

When you actually have to watch and keep records of my every move, it is considered an obsession. While it could be construed as cyberstalking, I do not fear as I know my own abilities and how to deal with them. Therefore, please tell your cult to please listen to your own wisdom and repent.

-- Posted by Evil Monkey on Sat, Jun 28, 2008, at 1:01 PM

parkerbrothers...If you have God in your heart and your life like you say you do...Why do you always find fault with everyone that lives a different life than you ??? Why do you judge people??? God does not judge any of us...he loves us all...You can talk and talk about how some people live and you know that God does not like that..But you are wrong...He loves us all no matter what...Go ahead and blog me back and put me down and tell me that I do not have God in my life and I need to read the bible...It will give everyone else a rest from you putting them down while you put me down...But to save you some time I have God in my life and in my heart and he is so Happy that I love everyone and will help out anyone no matter how they live or who they love...I have no HATE in my heart like you and Mr. Bell....That is how God wants it...Love one another NOT hate .....

-- Posted by rebelrose on Sat, Jun 28, 2008, at 12:48 PM

Repentance necessitates change.

No change, no repentance.

-- Posted by jesse sellers on Sat, Jun 28, 2008, at 11:46 AM

Still couldn't answer the questions. You don't even know what trolling is, why do you continually take it out of context. Oh wait I know why, You're ignorant and close-minded.

-- Posted by Evil Monkey on Sat, Jun 28, 2008, at 8:37 AM

Evil monkey,

Excuse my manners for not welcoming you back as I should have. We did miss you. I understand however, since you have been very busy trolling from blog to blog offering your advise and comments to all you could. I personally admire you for such an exhausting endevour. It would be nice if you could figure a way to be compensated for all your time trolling.

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Sat, Jun 28, 2008, at 5:24 AM

PS

Monkey Good to see you back in your usual form.

-- Posted by jesse sellers on Sat, Jun 28, 2008, at 1:37 AM

memyselfi

Look up the key word meaning in that verse (impenitent) or(penitent) Sorry it took me so long to get back to you.

I believe you will understand why I made the statement.

-- Posted by jesse sellers on Sat, Jun 28, 2008, at 1:26 AM

Nosey Monkey???

http://steinbring.net/blog/funny-looking...

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Fri, Jun 27, 2008, at 9:07 PM

memyselfi,

They cannot answer any of it because there is nothing they can say. There has never been a single straight answer from them EVER. It is always a twist here and they continually turn it away from the topic at hand. Parkerbrothers STILL cannot answer it. Instead he has to spend hours upon hours looking at past comments and archiving data about me, He spends more time doing that then answering the question.

-- Posted by Evil Monkey on Fri, Jun 27, 2008, at 7:56 PM

Is it considered bad manners to go to different peoples blogs? I have been assuming all week that it was rude to ignore them if you any thing to say at all. If someone wants to take the time to come up with a subject, I assume they want a reply. However, I am new and do not know the etiquette involved in this situation. What is a troll exactly? I assume you are not referring to a traditonal troll as I would know it.

greasemonkey, I do not know if you calling my opinion sick will do much for either of us to more fully understand the others positions. I would have much rather you wrote exactly why you do think that comparison is sick, or asked me to explain why I made that correlation. I believe the two issues do have a lot in common.

As far as a Pandoras Box being opened, Yes it will, if you choose to took at that way. Things do change and future changes are dependant on the changes and choices made today, just like todays are a result from the ones in the past. I prefer to look at from the view point that a Pandoras box has been opened since the uncaused cause whatever that may be.

I do not know that we as a society can be much more dependant on our government than we currently are. I also do not think a democratic party run government could do much more to spend than our current administration and either Congress during the last 7 years. Either party has a fundamental basic agenda of privatizing public funds the way I see it.

jesse, I have re-read and I am of the opinion that 2-5 is still referring to the same person/people described in 2 1-4. To my understanding, the first chapter in Romans is directed at a group of people (likely fairly devout Christians) and is working them up, uniting them in their anger, pointing fingers at the "bad people". Then at the height of their smugness abruptly changing course and saying "Oh no, I am speaking of you". This ironic writing style is a great literary tool that was used several time in the OT as well. You can still see forms of it in movies today. Please tell me what you think. I am not trying to "trick" you, just want to know your opinion. There is no right or wrong interpretation as far as I am concerned.

-- Posted by memyselfi on Fri, Jun 27, 2008, at 7:46 PM

Dude, you don't even know what trolling is. You are using it in your own old fart way. You are not clever with your anecdotes.

-- Posted by Evil Monkey on Fri, Jun 27, 2008, at 6:51 PM

Evil monkey,

By no means am I condemning you for trolling in every pond you could find. I actually think it is good you are so concerned with any and everything.

My intent was only to correct you on who was trolling all over the place and who casting and retreiving in their own little pond.

My apologies for any ruffled fur or tales bent out of shape. :)

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Fri, Jun 27, 2008, at 6:29 PM

Again, you avoid the question by twisting it back to me. Must be guilt.

-- Posted by Evil Monkey on Fri, Jun 27, 2008, at 5:26 PM

No, just observation.

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Fri, Jun 27, 2008, at 5:30 PM

WOW how unusual to twist it right back around to avoid the question. Anyone surprised? Haha.

-- Posted by Evil Monkey on Fri, Jun 27, 2008, at 3:24 PM

WOW he still can not tell us what he believes in. Only what he does not believe. Anyone suprised?

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Fri, Jun 27, 2008, at 5:26 PM

Again, you avoid the question by twisting it back to me. Must be guilt.

-- Posted by Evil Monkey on Fri, Jun 27, 2008, at 5:26 PM

Evil Monkey,

Sorry, I was just responding to "one" of your comments.

-----------------------------------

Let me keep you occupied and pick another one:

"Why do people even fall for this crap? Stop feeding the trolls and they will stop eating this up. Simply put, he does it for attention."

Posted by Evil Monkey on Fri, Jun 27, 2008, at 12:02 PM

Your above comment aroused my curiosity. I knew I did not troll from one blog to another so I thought I would check to see if there was any truth to your comment and see if Michael had been trolling.

No, he pretty well stayed in the same lake of his but I did notice someone trolling almost all blogs on here and he had the same name as you. I would report it to the paper and have someone quit using your name evil monkey. They made it look like you had your nose stuck everywhere but between your lips and eyes.

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Fri, Jun 27, 2008, at 5:24 PM

WOW how unusual to twist it right back around to avoid the question. Anyone surprised? Haha.

-- Posted by Evil Monkey on Fri, Jun 27, 2008, at 3:24 PM

Evil Monkey,

When you come to know a Living Christ you will never be a sad lonely man as you accuse us of being. I can see how that might be hard for you to grasp since your savior is dead and you really have nothing to believe in. That really would be lonely.

Why not try to develop a relationship with a Living Christ that will always be with you and never forsake you?

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Fri, Jun 27, 2008, at 3:17 PM

How about a nice heap of boo hoo? Why do you cry injustice when you feel your boyfriend is being picked on? You both seek attention, because you are both sad lonely men. I condemn a man whose actions and words induce fear, hatred and disapproves how Jesus would behave in the same instant.

And what do you mean load your boat? Are you stating something that isn't true? Hmm, let me check my transcripts, heh. You're a joke. I am glad you fear me enough that you feel the need to keep transcripts of me on the 13th floor of "some" Nashville building. Really I am flattered.

-- Posted by Evil Monkey on Fri, Jun 27, 2008, at 2:09 PM

Evil Monkey,

I know why he does as he does and it is not for the attention. Who would want the attention of constant criticism and condemnation some of you heap on him. He has a mission and it is commendable.

The real question is why do you do as you do? You do not believe in anything. You disbelieve in nearly everything and condemn a man who believes in something. It seems you are the one in need of attention and want to load your boat. I would suggest you print an itinerary and list your Port of Call and set sail with all who wish to accompany you to your destination. Send a post card.

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Fri, Jun 27, 2008, at 12:49 PM

Sexism

Sexist beliefs, as a part of essentialism, holds that individuals can be understood or judged based primarily on the characteristics of the group to which they belong--in this case, their sexual group, as men or women. This assumes that all individuals fit into the category of male or female and does not take into account intersexed people who are born with a mixture of male and female sexual characteristics. This also assumes a significant degree of homogeneity in the characteristics of men and women respectively, and generally does not take into account the differences that exist within these groups. XY males and XX females who are genetically one sex but have developed the characteristics of the opposite sex during the foetal stage are usually considered with respect to their phenotypes under this system.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexism

-- Posted by Dianatn on Fri, Jun 27, 2008, at 12:44 PM

michaelbell,

As fast as things are esculating 2012 could be mid tribulation.

And it may not be, but I would not be suprised either way.

-- Posted by parkerbrothers on Fri, Jun 27, 2008, at 12:32 PM

Why do people even fall for this crap? Stop feeding the trolls and they will stop eating this up. Simply put, he does it for attention. He has NEVER done a thing for this community and does NOT care.

-- Posted by Evil Monkey on Fri, Jun 27, 2008, at 12:02 PM

You know that the Four Horsemen will be coming with Hades behind.

Hades is another name for Pluto.

Where you find Pluto,you will find Mickey.

Ergo,the end times will be orchestrated by a global corporation offering a synthetic Magic Kingdom instead of our making the most of God's reality.

(Hey,it makes as much sense as a lot of speculation I've heard.)

I'd be more comfortable if people just bonded with God as individuals and let the welfare of the country and the planet be determined by the loving-kindness,courage,integrity and rationality that would be the natural by-products of that relationship.

I'm reminded of a small child that was fretful because she was trying to sleep while there was still sunshine streaming through the windows.

"There's too much light in here. We need to bring in some more dark."

Unfortunately for the devil,he can't bring in more darkness.

The most he can do is shut out some of the Light.

If we stop concerning ourselves with how much darkness exists and concentrate on generating light and increasing access to that light,then we'll discover that,in most cases,a little illumination is enough to help us see clearly and keep predators at bay.

(The less light we have,the closer we need to get to its Source.)

If we want to be able to function after nightfall,we can either try to get rid of all that dark or we can make sure we have plenty of Light,an unfailing Power Source,lots of shiny souls reflecting and amplifying that Light and that we are using our bushel baskets to hold our blessings rather than conceal brightly burning lamps.

-- Posted by quantumcat on Fri, Jun 27, 2008, at 11:39 AM

Its sad that TN has to pass laws to tell us what we already know marriage should be. We the people should have better morals than that. Before yall groan and say "oh no another crazy bible thumper point of view"(i am proud to thump my bible by the way)Religious views aside, homosexual marriage opens up a pandoras box, for people to marry whatever they want. Please dont compare the homosexual debate to the civil rights movement, thats just sick. I will say though that I should treat homosexuals with love and respect and Im guilty of not doing that, because there sin is no worse than anyone elses.

Obama scares me because of his socialist agenda, he wants the people to be more dependant on the government to the point that we cant do anything without them. Im also scared what dmage can be done with a democrat controlled congress with a democrat pres. They will think they are on a taxpayer funded shopping spree. I wonder why hes been lying about alot of his muslim and arab background though? If religion doesnt matter whats he got to hide? Obama just scares me, but I will admit a little less than Hillary did though.

I have studied the Real ID and its coming, and its gonna suck.

-- Posted by greasemonkey on Fri, Jun 27, 2008, at 9:13 AM

Here's the way I look at it, with all the bad stuff going on right now in the world, it does seem to point to Armageddon. God said in Revelations there would be signs to look for. And sure enough things have been happening. This is from my Christian point of view.

As a Christian, I'd say we all had better start getting prepared. And before I step on anybody's toes or anything, I'd just like to say that while I am devout in my religion, I still respect the beliefs and opinions of others.

Basically who am I to judge; God's the only being that can do that.

As for this blog, I do agree with some of Mr. Bell's views. I do not believe that he is a racist OR a sexist either. Sexism really doesn't even have anything to do with this post.

Sexism is the discrimination of either gender male or female. But Mr. Bell has said nothing that even remotely could be confused with that issue. Yes, he DOES say that he does not agree with the homosexual preferences, but that is simply his opinion.

And as for the Obama issue....eh' best to say just don't get me started on that one. ;)

Well, I guess that's enough of my conservative ranting for today. lol. Take care everybody and have a good day. :)

-- Posted by Raven Shonski on Fri, Jun 27, 2008, at 7:47 AM

Jesse, I am not sure you and I get the same meaning from Romans 2-5, but I will reread sometime today and I wish you would as well, then we can debate the nuances of the verses if you like. We may not agree on the meaning, but that is okay too.

I think I may be a little more liberal in accepting other nationalities than you are. I admit that I have a hard time seeing people that happened to born elsewhere as not having the same basic humanity as myself, or having the opinion that they should have no thoughts about how things should be. You know, Jesus and Paul were travelers. I wonder if you may have discounted their message because they were from somewhere else. Just a thought...

-- Posted by memyselfi on Fri, Jun 27, 2008, at 6:28 AM

Yes times change and also man's facts

Yes I believe Obama will be the next President.

Verse 5 of Romans-2 tells us all what will happen (IF WE DON'T CHANGE OUR WAYS.) I believe that is the main message Pastor Mike is deweling on.

Yes, you could call me a racist of nationality. If you don't want to be an American why come.

When someone comes into this country and wants to have it run like the one they escaped from I have a problem with that.

If theirs was that great why leave.

-- Posted by jesse sellers on Fri, Jun 27, 2008, at 5:05 AM

michaelbell, I do not know if you are referring to me and are assuming that I am accusing you of anything, but that is not my intention. I just fundamentally disagree with some of your subject, not only in a realistic and moral way, but from scripture as well and I was trying to explain why.

The Christian faith has grown as much from tolerance as from force, and the red letters have more than a little to say about it. I wish you could step back and re-evaluate your thoughts with a fresh look at exactly what you do believe and why. I am not asking you to abandon your faith, just to try and narrow down why you believe what you do based on the bible, not tradition. Then you can explain it to me, you never know, I may be a Christian deep down after all and you could help me to understand. What is the Judeo Christian pathway to God? There does not seem to be a consensus on this.

-- Posted by memyselfi on Fri, Jun 27, 2008, at 4:53 AM

Pastor Mike

First time in history a Presidential candidate born American, raised and schooled in a foreign country embedded with there principals and doctrine.

Did he refuse to be sworn in on the Bible when he took the oath of office?

-- Posted by jesse sellers on Fri, Jun 27, 2008, at 4:13 AM

People accuse me of "religious intolerance"

If that means only believing the Judeo-Christian faith as the pathway to God, then I guess I will be intolerant till I die.

-- Posted by michaelbell on Fri, Jun 27, 2008, at 4:07 AM

I have already expressed my opinion that the world is not so bad today compared to the past, in fact I would say we are better off on every single point you brought up. You did bring more to your comments today that I would like to reply to though.

As far as America spreading the gospel, Spain was also very interested and accomplished in the same objective, but they had ideas of empire. I wonder if there is a correlation. I am not saying that the priests could have cared less about land boundaries, I have faith most were just interested in saving souls. Without the priests though, Spain could not have been anywhere near as successful.

Tennessee is fighting a losing battle. Times have changed. It is easier for me to view the current debate in the same context as abolition, worker rights, suffrage or the civil rights movement. There were good Christians that opposed these changes. History has proven these well intentioned people were an embarrassment to their faith. I do not know why, but for some reason believers seem to resist change more than most, even when their position is based more on tradition than scripture.

I am also of the opinion that your thoughts regarding homosexuality have weak support from scripture, unless you are Jewish. I am sure you completely understand Romans 1, but I think you should reread chapter 2 right after. As I am sure you already know, chapter and verse are more recent additions to make such a large volume easier to study.

Now Obama, do you believe that a persons religious beliefs affects their ability to lead? Are you afraid that a Muslim will sell us out? Do you think the president has the ability to do whatever they want? The current administration is the closest thing to unaccountable as we have had in while, but you have to take into consideration the decades that the same people have been in power in many areas of government. Obama, if elected, will have a hard time changing much in 4 years. If that is really one of his objectives anyway. If I had to guess, I would say that he will win the election as a symbol to the citizens of this and other countries that our government has "learned their lesson", but nothing much will change. I also doubt the extent of the racism you mentioned. Most racists I know are either too old, or too uneducated to pull off a presidential assassination. You can bet that if he is assassinated that it will be by someone that couldnt care less about his skin color.

Finally just for the record, I do not believe any politician that has achieved so much has religious convictions at all. The two do not seem to go hand in hand. I would guess most politicians in positions of power worship Adam Smith more than any God.

-- Posted by memyselfi on Fri, Jun 27, 2008, at 4:06 AM

not sexist either , just their preference on who or what they have sex with.

Not paranoid for I know where my home will be just want to warn people of coming times so they can make the right choice.

JESUS!

-- Posted by michaelbell on Thu, Jun 26, 2008, at 8:42 PM

You don't see skin color but you see the gender Wouldn't that make you a sexist?

-- Posted by Dianatn on Thu, Jun 26, 2008, at 7:43 PM

LMAO... Are you really that paranoid about everything? My goodness it has got suck being so anal (no pun intended) about everything... Thanks for my daily laugh.

-- Posted by darrick_04 on Thu, Jun 26, 2008, at 6:58 PM


Respond to this blog

Posting a comment requires free registration. If you already have an account, enter your username and password below. Otherwise, click here to register.

Username:

Password:  (Forgot your password?)

Your comments:
Please be respectful of others and try to stay on topic.


View From the Crossroads
Michael Bell
Recent posts
Archives
Blog RSS feed [Feed icon]
Comments RSS feed [Feed icon]
Login
Hot topics
By the People or By the Judges.
(83 ~ 3:04 PM, Dec 3)

I Thought I had Seen It All !
(153 ~ 2:54 PM, Dec 3)

Under the Radar
(102 ~ 3:23 AM, Nov 29)

The Driving Force Behind Me!
(111 ~ 1:05 PM, Nov 28)

Hades, Hell, Sheol, or What?
(27 ~ 5:20 PM, Nov 21)