Feels like: 104°F
Saturday, June 25, 2016
Bell Buckle is considering WHAT?Posted Wednesday, January 9, 2008, at 4:20 PM
I posted this comment in response to a news story in tonight's paper regarding the first reading AND PASSING of an ordinance that would make "brown bagging" legal again.
Are we really surprised? We allowed beer to be sold in the city limits to help our "neighbor", who did not live in Bell Buckle, even though beer was sold a mile or so away, outside the city limits. THEN THE MERCHANT SOLD HIS BUSINESS!
How much has BB made from that deal? Not that our community should be sold at any price, but that was part of the reasoning that got it approved. We would make tons of money.
It was only a matter of time for this to come up. I am surprised it did not raise its' head before the last administration was gone.
Using the excuse that it can not be enforced would mean that anything is legal. Who stops prostitution, gambling or drug dealing? Since Bell Buckle can not enforce these laws, does that make them "bad" as well and reason to be legalized? That sure would change the quiet little town.
Saying it infringes on the customer's rights is a strange argument. How many customers pay Bell Buckle taxes? Who lives in the town, the customers? Did the customers elect our leadership? I must have missed something.
People are getting used to not smoking in restaurants, but we can not enforce it, so is that next?
We had conversations with the owner of a restaurant moving "out of town" just a few days ago. Ironically, he is moving to the place that sold beer before we allowed it in the city limits.
I am surprised that he did not mention drinking as the reason he left, but instead that there was not enough parking for his customers, do to the other restaurant having so much business. He also has walk-in refrigeration and is probably paying less rent than he was paying on the front square.
The Bell Buckle Cafe seems to be doing well without on site alcohol consumption based on the waiting lines. I can not believe that we are now worried about the customer's right to drink alcohol more than the resident's rights to a safe community.
Out of curiosity, if a bar serves someone who gets drunk and then leaves to have an accident, I thought they had some responsibility. This encourage the bartenders and restaurants to restrict someone who overindulges. Who would stop the brown bagger? Would the restaurant be culpable?
Showing most recent comments first
[Show in chronological order instead]
Respond to this blog
Posting a comment requires free registration:
- Blog RSS feed
- Comments RSS feed
- Send email to Steve Mills
Steve Mills and his wife have one daughter and live on a farm outside of Bell Buckle. They previously owned two coffee/ice cream shops, currently operate an internet sales company and teach classes, but his primary job involves the paper industry worldwide. Hobbies and interests lie in gardening, photography, recorded music and of course, their pets.
Hot topicsWhy is the UK leaving the EU?
(17 ~ 5:37 PM, Jun 25)
Surprise surprise! Maybe from the rain storm?
Is there a national news media that reports the news without bias?
Hey! Tonight is the Weed'em & Reap Social dinner!
A gardener's garden memorial and garden ramblings.