*
Bedford Ramblings
Steve Mills

And the winner is....... Lindsey Graham

Posted Thursday, September 27, 2018, at 9:38 PM
Comments
View 26 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • I also switched between channels to see how the "talking heads" were responding to it. Probably the most interesting comment to me came from a woman who belittle Mr. Kavanaugh's emotional state during his opening comment. It was OK for women to tear up and show emotion, but for a man, it was false and she thought women would respond, "Give me a break".

    Do you agree?

    -- Posted by stevemills on Thu, Sep 27, 2018, at 9:37 PM
  • The biggest takeaway for me was showing how Feinstein hung both of these people out to create a public spectacle.

    In the end, I don't think a single vote was changed by this dog and pony show.

    Agreed on Graham lowering the boom.

    Also interesting was memories being "indelible in the hippocampus" unless you mean exactly when or where it happened.

    -- Posted by quietmike on Thu, Sep 27, 2018, at 11:11 PM
  • Yeah, selective memory. Apparently at odds with all the witnesses she claims were there. I forget, was it 6 or 8? Not a bit of corroboration yet they let her try to destroy a good man and judge. Pathetic. I thought it was nice Graham pointed out the truth. Can't wait to see how they will outdo themselves next time.

    -- Posted by fair share on Fri, Sep 28, 2018, at 4:29 AM
  • People seem to forget that one can be so drunk that they can not remember what happened, or misremember what did happen.

    -- Posted by Tyger on Fri, Sep 28, 2018, at 8:03 AM
  • Search and Destroy was the goal, all along.

    -- Posted by Wolf Clan on Fri, Sep 28, 2018, at 10:24 AM
  • The most interesting thing to me is how people have made their decision on the veracity of these charges based solely on political persuasion.

    Based on the testimony; based on the stories coming out; based on still remembering being in high school myself (altho it has been some time ago) I have no doubt that the story being told is true. The real question is whether this disqualifies Kavanaugh from being placed on the Supreme Court. Personally, I don't see why it would. Who would qualify for anything if it required they never screwed up in high school?

    One thing that seems clear from all the stories being told. That was the culture at that school. The alcohol consumption, the sexcapades, that was the norm. At the risk of tilting towards the "blame the victim" side; girls went to those parties. They drank. They let themselves get alone with drunken boys. There has to be some culpability in putting one's self into bad situations.

    What is on trial here is not Kavanaugh's Supreme Court nomination. That was never really in doubt. We would vote along party lines if he had killed someone. We will hardly blink at a mere molestation. What is really there for us to look at is our attitude towards sex and youth. "Boys will be boys" with a nod and a wink only applies when it is not our daughter or sister. We spend more time preaching "purity" than we do teaching our daughters how to avoid bad situations. And, when push comes to shove, denigrating the victim is how we defend the perpetrator.

    We seem to have a lot of ambiguity in our attitudes, and a strong desire to turn a blind eye towards inappropriate sexual behavior. because that is not just something that happens among teenagers. When I look at this incident, it does not come across as "all that bad." He held her down. He rubbed himself against her, put his hands where they didn't belong, and otherwise behaved as an axx. But, he didn't rape her. She wasn't physically injured. However, I am looking at this from a male perspective. I have never been in that position. This is something that really is an issue in our society. Because it doesn't just happen at rich prep schools, or schools in general. It happens in the workplace, in the military, at church, anywhere we have men and women together. If you listen to women discussing this, it seems like almost all of them have their own story. But, they usually keep those stories to themselves, even when the outcome is a lot more serious than this incident. And it is easy to see why. Denigrating the victim is how we defend the perpetrator.

    So, this story does not have much importance in the political realm. We will vote along party lines, and Kavanaugh will be confirmed. he has hardly been ruined. maybe a little embarrassed; which most of us would be if our worst moments as high school kids were displayed for the world to see. The only real value would be if it created some dialogue about this issue. Maybe we could be reminded how important it is to teach our sons how real men behave, and our daughters how to stay out of bad situations.

    Personally, I think the right approach would have been for Kavanaugh to confess right at the start. It isn't like there are criminal charges to come out of this. And it isn't like it is something that he did as an adult. A forthright admission, and a sincere apology is what a "great" man would do.

    -- Posted by lazarus on Fri, Sep 28, 2018, at 10:49 AM
  • *

    Without an FBI investigation, it's just a "he said, she said" and we'll never know the real truth.

    There was another guy implicated in the alleged sexual assault. Kavanaugh's friend, Mark Judge.

    An FBI investigation would be able to subpoena Mark Judge and other witnesses to get their testimony.

    That's the reason the accuser and others requested it. She also took a polygraph.

    By refusing the investigation, it looks to me like Kavanaugh and republicans have something to hide.

    Also, I'm almost positive Kavanaugh lied about the sexual posts in the yearbook. Every guy remembers the significance of the "7 F's" when talking about girls. "Find 'em, French 'em, etc, etc, Forget 'em.

    And the "devils triangle" is also a sexual reference, not a drinking game similar to "quarters", as Kavanaugh implied. So, he lied. Why? And what else is he lying about?

    No wonder he doesn't want an FBI investigation.

    -- Posted by RocketValentine on Fri, Sep 28, 2018, at 10:53 AM
  • *

    And if we're talking about an Oscar performance in the category of political theater, then yes, Lindsey Graham is the winner.

    That was his audition for the job of Attorney General.

    We'll see if it works. I thought it was rather pathetic.

    -- Posted by RocketValentine on Fri, Sep 28, 2018, at 11:00 AM
  • Did anyone see an envelope passed from a woman’s hands to one of Ford’s attorney’s hands? They seemed to want to keep it hidden but if that was the case, they should have done it before somewhere with a few less cameras.

    They say it was just letters of support for Ford. I can see why they would want to surreptitiously pass that on.

    -- Posted by stevemills on Fri, Sep 28, 2018, at 11:08 AM
  • I understand and agree with most of what you said Laz but would you “man-up” and confess if you had not done it?

    I too was good friends with a guy who bragged about his conquests. Most of us had no way of knowing if it was true or not but I went places with him and would really resent someone accusing me of something because I was hanging around with him. If I had not gone with him, I probably would never have gone anywhere growing up.

    I was not a party goer in HS. Parents did not allow many, so you would think I would remember who was at the few I went to. I do not and if I crashed a party of people I did not normally associate with, I doubt that I would get close to remembering names.

    As far as parents teaching, they leave that up to the schools that probably cannot teach morality because that would delve too close to religion.

    I distinctly remember my mother telling a us boys that she would “cut it off” if we got a girl in trouble. That was even before I understood what she would cut off and how that applied to girls.

    We were taught at HOME and our sister taught us the polite things like walking on the street side of a woman and opening doors.

    I don’t know what parties some went to but we actually did toss coins in bottles and spin the bottle was about as extreme as we went and often everyone never went through with the kids.

    -- Posted by stevemills on Fri, Sep 28, 2018, at 11:33 AM
  • Kavanaugh does not have the temperament to be a Supreme Court Judge.He was a wreck yesterday crying one minute cocky and sarcastic the next with democratic senators,he cried more than Dr Ford.One thing I do know is that alcoholics drink a lot of water,I bet he drank a gallon.I thought he was going to loose it.He appeared to be lying when asked about writings on his calendar.Americans can see through the republicons partisian kangaroo sham of an investigation.Mark Judge is staying in hiding to keep from testifying and telling the truth about his buddy.And that is just where the republicons want him to stay.Why are they afraid to let him testify?

    -- Posted by lets be real on Fri, Sep 28, 2018, at 11:33 AM
  • It's nice to know that we have someone here who is authorized to cast the first stone!

    This all day questioning was not an investigation nor a trial. It was merely two people speaking about what they remember about the incident that happened back when the youth movement was "FREE SEX". this was the same year that Aids was first found in America.

    I heard Ford saying - she and her girl friend went to a party in someone's house. She was introduced to Kavanaugh by this girl friend. No mention of any other girls involved that night.

    She spoke out and said Kavanaugh and the other 3 older boys were drunk and falling, yet she wound up in a dark room with all 4 older dunk boys. No mention of her girl friend in the room with her.

    The biggest crime she was very unhappy with was that all the boys were laughing. She couldn't stand it and stated it in a way that leads me to believe she promised herself to get revenge for the laughter, not the fondling.

    She later went on to say her and her mother went to a store and she went in a different door than her mother (because she didn't want to be seen walking with her mother). After going inside the store, she recognized Judge who worked there. She claims Judge would not look at her because he was there at the party.

    If she was so terrified by these 4 older boys who she admitted was afraid they would kill her, she didn't seem to be afraid to look at him in the store and acted as though he should have greeted her with a smile.

    That doesn't sound like a girl who was terrified by some "Attempted Rape" 4 weeks earlier.

    Yet yesterday, she claims she had trouble making friends with boys for 4 years after that party night. She also claimed she was afraid to fly because of that frightful night. How does that fit together?

    She went on to college like nothing that ever happened and became a doctor of Psychiatry.

    20 some years later as a Psychiatrist, wouldn't she have learned how to cope with sexual abuse and how to help others with sexual abuse? Of course she would! SO she is going after Kavanaugh because now he is trying for a seat on the SCOTUS.

    Remember how she described the laughter ringing in her ears at the event and how much she hated that? More so, than the boy laying on top of her and fondling her soft warm? Never did she admit that she did or didn't Hate what Kavanaugh was doing except she thought maybe he was going to kill her. It was all about the laughter that made her very upset.

    Looks to me like she is getting her revenge for the laughter that night. Not the Sexual Assault, but the laughter.

    -- Posted by sui on Fri, Sep 28, 2018, at 2:10 PM
  • Frankly, unreal, I couldn't care less how much water you drink.

    Steve, it sounds like you were a real hound back in the day. 🐕

    RV, you are putting too much trust in the polygraph. mrs ford's consisted of 2 questions. No getting a baseline with known positives and known negatives. There is good reason they aren't allowed in court. A reasonably good liar can easily beat them. And no matter how false the statement is, if the person believes it, they will pass. The FBI "investigation" will consist of them interviewing willing participants. They won't be doing a criminal investigation.

    Laz, welcome back from your "lost weekend". You are absolutely right. Even if mrs ford isn't the two bit political hack whose memory only becomes harmful to the country after being focused and fine tuned by consulting with feindsteins lawyers and she really is telling the truth after 30some years, so what? IF she is telling the truth, he touched her. When he was a minor. If this would disqualify Kavanaugh from SCOTUS or anything else, then we might as well just lock everyone up on their 18th birthday.

    -- Posted by fair share on Fri, Sep 28, 2018, at 2:16 PM
  • Mrs. Ford was drinking a lot of water while she was speaking. Her mouth must have been pretty dry from lying.

    -- Posted by sui on Fri, Sep 28, 2018, at 9:26 PM
  • LBR, is it sexist to say men can't cry? He and his family has been through so much that I do not blame him for pent up anger, frustration and emotions.

    From the description of Mark Judge, I am not sure either side would benefit from him testifying in open hearings. He apparently is already an emotional wreck and fragile, but what is that to a political party smelling blood? They put Mrs. Ford through it as well. It just took a lot of encouragement and coaching by her lawyers.

    Have you seen what her GoFundMe page is doing? I don't think she did this for financial gain but it looks as if she will turn a healthy profit.

    I agree that the actual touching and effort to engage in sex is really not a big thing. She said no and got out of there, but if it was traumatic for her, she has a right to say so, even if belatedly. Her reason is a bit suspect to me since the man seems to have lived a productive upstanding adult life. I suspect it was more the urging of political forces.

    BUT if it WAS Kavanaugh and he has so powerfully lied, there is no going back. That would show a weakness, panic, and untruthfulness that does not belong on the Supreme Court. Although, I suspect we have some humans on the court now.

    I found it interesting this morning, when asked what should occur if the FBI report finds no collaborating evidence of misbehavior, a supposed reporter Cokie Roberts, said it did not matter. She feels that he showed his true colors by defending his honor and could not longer be impartial. Why not?

    She used another Supreme Court nominee words that he saw his job as an umpire. True, if you are looking at two sides of a case, but NOT when you are defending your own honor. Get real Cokie! I believe you have disqualified yourself of saying you are a reporter. You are an opinionated commentator, but NOT an unbiased reporter.

    IF in fact they find information that Mrs. Ford intentionally distorted facts, there should be some punishment. Maybe her GoFundMe Page is locked and turned over to rape crisis center or something similar. Any speaking funds or book deals, likewise.

    And the political machine that pushed it? Hopefully they will get their punishment at the polls.

    -- Posted by stevemills on Sat, Sep 29, 2018, at 10:12 AM
  • Amazing how stupid people are when it comes to law and lives and lawyers.

    If you are a lawyer, you work for the court. How does they represent your rights in court when it is the court that is bringing the charges against you?

    Also it is the job of the lawyer to protect his/her client no matter what they have to do. Lawyers will turn against the law itself to protect a client. How else could crime syndicates win their cases? These high level Lawyers are shady but know the laws and use them against the State.

    A lawyer who represents you, wins the case then charges you for court costs is a crime in itself. Why should you pay court costs if your found innocent? The State should pay the costs, you were found innocent.

    If a lawyer has to defend his life or reputation, why shouldn't he get angry at someone who accuses them of faults evidence. That has nothing to do with being Bias. Of course he/she is going to be bias. You are fighting for your own life achievements and reputation. No one else is representing you.

    Siting on the bench as a Justice on the SCOTUS is a little different. You aren't being paid to represent a client per say. You are ruling on what the Constitution says and the supreme law of the land which is Common Law.

    For example: A Common Law Marriage is the highest Protected Marriage you could ever ask for.

    The state may not recognize it because the State isn't made a third party to your marriage and has no say so over your family and kids like they do if you purchase a Marriage License from the State. That is why the States don't want to recognize a Common Law Marriage. It is a Marriage between you and your spouse and God. The State isn't named in your Marriage and has no contract in your marriage. The same applies to every thing you purchase a License to do in your State. The States want to be named in all your contracts so they can rule in all aspect of your life.

    The Constitution tries to prevent this but people don't read the constitution so we need Justices to rule on who has the rights over you in whatever comes up in court.

    We need people who will follow the Supreme Law to protect our rights, but you have to claim them.

    The SCOTUS Justice will rule according to who you are as well. For example, if you only have Civil Rights and Not Unalienable Rights, the Supreme court must rule differently in your case as a Civil Privileged person.

    This will look like they have changed the law or the decision was reversed or overturned, but not the case. Each court case is ruled according to the class of citizen and if the state is named in your contract or not. See how difficult it is for the average person to know the law.

    Even judges can't keep up with all the laws.

    Now do you see why it is important to get as many Justices on the SCOTUS as we can who will rule in favor of the Common Law (Supreme Law of the Land)?

    That is why YOU have to find a Supreme Court decision to rule in your favor, unless you only have civil rights. The courts must rule in favor of the Common Law unless you don't know your rights.

    The FBI can not say who is guilty in an accusation where no crime is committed. The mere fact that the Statute of Limitation has expired makes it senseless to involve the FBI.

    This is the Democrats stupidity of raising the deficit more and more each day they postpone this voting. That is what XPres Obama did for 8 years and is going to Gitmo with Hillary and tried for Treason. Hillary will be tried for Pedogate and Pizzagate and 1st degree murder along with Huma Abidene, as well as Treason, but only executed once. Watch for it!

    Some of the Democrats sitting now will be going to Gitmo in the coming year as well as Republicans! Something New Happening on Oct 3, 2018 at 2:13 p.m. Eastern Time. Be sure your cell phone is on.

    -- Posted by sui on Sat, Sep 29, 2018, at 1:27 PM
  • Steve, don't be too hard on kooky. She is just another resister that will lie, cheat, and steal if she thinks it will help keep this country pushed down in the muck. No better or worse than mrs ford or any of the other freak show clowns making a scene lately. I believe something happened to mrs ford. Brown boot george soros, diane fiendstein, and the dumcrap party got ahold of her. That's what happened to her. But to her credit, she was a resister to start with. For those of you that believe her story, please tell me which one you believe? The one in her letter? The one she told the paper? Or maybe the one she hand wrote for the "lie detector"? Speaking of her polygraph, I hope most people realize what a joke it is. It consisted of 2 general questions. No questions to set a baseline. Most 8 year olds could beat it without much effort. How well do you think an adult who has had college level and higher courses in manipulation (the psych brochures call it "persuation") could do. Irregardless of all that, if she could legitimately pass a legitimate exam, the best it could show is that she believes what she said, not necessarily the actual truth. If you look at her hand written statement that was the basis for the polygraph, you will notice she didn't even sign it with her real name. But I can understand her not wanting to use her last name since she has recently given it a big black eye. Used to when I thought of "Ford", I thought "Found On Roadside Dead" or "Fixed Or Repaired Daily". Forever more, I will think "F*cking Our Republic Determinedly". And for those who think poorly of Kavanaugh for not asking for a polygraph or for the FBI to do yet another investigation of him, gimme a break. You know (or should) that the FBI will be collecting statements and turning them over to the Committee. They will not be drawing any conclusions or making any determinations or investigating any crimes. If you want a criminal investigation, tell your skank ford to file a report with the local law enforcement office where the alleged crime supposedly occurred. Maybe you can help her remember where that was. While your at it, maybe help her remember when also. And Kavanaugh knows how unreliable polygraphs are. That is why they are inadmissible in court. The clowns seemed to be having a lot of fun asking Kavanaugh about his high school yearbook. I would have liked to have seen some delving into ford's hore school yearbook but the Republicans had too much class to do that. Bottom line is the dumcraps don't care one little bit about the truth. They only care about delaying the Senate vote and doing whatever it takes to resist any attempt to make this country better or stop the decline into socialism.

    -- Posted by fair share on Sat, Sep 29, 2018, at 3:36 PM
  • What you have to ask yourself is WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON IN THE BACKGROUND?

    Anytime the government makes something a big issue and stays on it, there is something bigger going on that they don't want you to know about.

    One of those things is what Google is doing. Watch your news!

    -- Posted by sui on Sat, Sep 29, 2018, at 6:35 PM
  • You mean a diversion from some other matter entirely?

    -- Posted by stevemills on Sat, Sep 29, 2018, at 8:12 PM
  • I know Google is answering questions about a bias toward Democrat/liberal, but I think the conservatives just don’t feel comfortable with “playing the game” as much nor as well as the liberals.

    -- Posted by stevemills on Sat, Sep 29, 2018, at 8:14 PM
  • This one isn't so much a diversion this time but they are bias which is getting them in trouble. The big damage is Google is thinking about creating a list of names of Chinese people who use Google and what they are googling. They would then give this list to the Chinese government who could put any one in prison or to death who googled any thing the government doesn't want them to know about.

    A Socialist/Communist Country and just one of the ways they control the people!

    This would be a violation of human rights abuse and corruption and Trumps new Executive Order gives him the power to go after the people that commit human rights abuse and corruption, even in Foreign Countries. Trump claims that a violation of human rights abuse and corruption is a threat to America and gives him the power (without the consent of Congress)to take whatever actions he feels is needed to end it (Arrest person(s) and seize their assets).

    Since trump's new Executive Order gives President Trump this power to act without asking Congress, then this would mean that "GOOGLE" could be charged with human rights abuse and corruption and possibly aiding the enemy and be charged with Treason and sent to Gitmo to stay with Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Victoria Clinton and the Obamas until they are executed.

    This Executive Order also allows Trump to take all the property, money, assets and interests of these corrupt government employees/contractors. This would be enough to pay off the Deficit of the United States.

    Here it is:

    https://tinyurl.com/y7pzecah

    I used tiny url to make it short enough to display here!

    -- Posted by sui on Sat, Sep 29, 2018, at 10:57 PM
  • Ford said she was a research psychologist in her opening statement. California databases show she is not a licensed psychologist, even though a license is required by California law to identify yourself as a psychologist.Her title at Stanford was changed as well.

    Two felonies (perjury and impersonating a licensed professional) in your opening statement is not a good start.

    She also told the Wa. post she was upset when trump was elected because Kavanaugh was on his list of judges. Kavanaugh wasn't added until Nov 2017, a full year later.

    A shaky accusation by a demonstrable liar, with zero corroborating evidence.... sounds legit.

    Liberal media told us what this was about immediately after Kavanaugh was nominated,the fate of Roe v Wade.

    Liberals are terrified they won't be able to kill their babies to avoid the consequences of being a (rhymes with door).

    -- Posted by quietmike on Sun, Sep 30, 2018, at 9:42 AM
  • The Democrats had a conference call to decide if they would use Mrs. Ford's Testimony, How they would use it, when they would use it and to see how many Demos were on board with it.

    It was not Ford's plan. The democrats took control of it to use against Judge Kavanaugh.

    The Democrats donated thousands to the cause and set up GoFundMe accounts for Mrs. Ford so she would testify, which she said she didn't want to do and wanted to remain unknown. The Democrats had other plans as usual (see Socialism/Communism).

    When you add all the donations she is getting they come to over $400,000.00 without any Book or Movie contracts.

    That is just how easily the Democrats can convert someone over to be a demon. Hillary being the Queen of the Demonic Deep State!

    Ford doesn't know it yet, but she has just destroyed her life. Another woman bites the dust because of the Demons. She might as well change her name to "Judas Iscariot"!

    Not only has she betrayed herself, but also every woman who has been abused. And there are more of them wanting some of that money the Democrats are handing out.

    Little do they Know that God is using Donald Trump to stop all this corruption.

    See: https://tinyurl.com/y7pzecah

    -- Posted by sui on Sun, Sep 30, 2018, at 11:26 AM
  • I am not sure about Lindsey Graham just yet. Lindsey Graham referred to himself as John McCain's spouse.

    John McCain was executed on his death bed. His death was announced before he died. They gave the day and time of his death.

    John Kasich slipped up the next day and said "it's like 24 hours since John McCain was put to death".

    McCain was a member of the deep state. I believe Lindsey Graham is also, but not sure. At McCains service Lindsey Graham was seen talking to and hugging Huma Abidene who definitely is in the Deep State along with the (Deep State Queen) Hillary Rotten Clinton.

    And all you Democrats begged for her to win the election and be your Queen President.

    I can't wait for all of you to see what she really is and what she did that is unspeakable. Yes! Worse than the Muslim President Obama who is about to be removed to Gitmo.

    Lindsey Graham is acting like a choir boy today. If he is Deep State, it's too late to repent, Trump is coming for all of them.

    If you watched the Kavanaugh questioning on the first day, Lindsey Graham drilled Judge Kavanaugh about the rights of Americans who were in foreign countries. In other words, if you are involved in the deep state and you leave the country to avoid arrest, would you be able to claim your constitutional rights to a trial in the good old USA?

    He sounded really worried or very confident he would not be one of them.

    Kavanaugh answered saying Americans had Constitutional rights in foreign countries, however, if you were a government employee involved in a coup against the government or president, you are basically in a military (or militia under the control of the Commander in Chief) and would not have constitutional rights in a Military Tribunal.

    Trump is draining the swamp and then some.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7F0CnIxWxEE&t=338s

    The executive order described above applies only to the 13 persons listed. However the list can be changed or added to a new list on a new executive order. Just showing doubters what Trump is doing.

    Is Lindsey Graham the Winner? You tell Me!

    UP DATE!

    Mrs. Ford's testimony is exploding on her according to my sources. Even the Dems are going against her. I doubt we will hear from anyone else against God's anointed.

    -- Posted by sui on Sun, Sep 30, 2018, at 12:35 PM
  • The State of Maryland does NOT have a Statute of Limitations, so this would be a police matter. However, the Maryland Police department has no intentions at this time to investigate the crime BECAUSE no one has asked for an investigation into the crime. They believe in the woman;s rights and will not investigate until such time as the victim asks for an investigation.

    Also another allegation has come up involving a woman who was an exgirlfriend of Kavanaugh who has just admitted it never happened.

    -- Posted by sui on Sun, Sep 30, 2018, at 1:42 PM
  • Then we have this:

    Blasey Ford's family all have deep and longstanding links to the CIA - an agency Trump has accused as being part of the "Deep State."

    Remember me telling everyone that we had the best Intel Agency "Money can Buy"?

    Christine Blasey Ford currently heads up the CIA Undergraduate Internship Program - a fact conveniently hidden from the public.

    Her father works for the CIA but not only that - he was an executive of the bank that handles the CIA's black budget! Christine's Father has Worked and still works for the CIA.

    Look at Julian Assange's accuser: A woman who worked at the Swedish Embassy in the United States who was a CIA agent planted to bring down Julian Assange, just like Ford was planted to prevent Kavanaugh from becoming a Justice of the SCOTUS.

    I have told everyone what Trump is doing to the members of the DEEP STATE! Oh ****! This means Ford could be flown over to GitMo to face a Military Tribunal. And she thought she was Groped and scared to death! She is fixing to find out what scared to death really is. She will wish she had taken that lie to the grave with her. She thinks she was groped, just wait until "Clapper" Gropes her around her neck at Gitmo for blowing their plans against Trump and Kavanaugh with her testimony. Pray for Mrs Ford. She blew it BIG Time.

    -- Posted by sui on Sun, Sep 30, 2018, at 3:09 PM
Respond to this blog

Posting a comment requires free registration: