Shelbyville, Tennessee · Friday, November 20, 2009
[SeMissourian.com] Fair ~ 52°F  
High: 66°F ~ Low: 43°F
Print Email link Respond to editor Read comments (4) Share link

Inventors claim truck runs on hydraulic power

Tuesday, June 19, 2007

(Photo)
Local inventors Andrew Lamb [left] and Randy Nichols claim to have come up with a way to send the oil companies fleeing in terror: A truck that has no internal combustion engine or gas tank.
(T-G Photo by Brian Mosely)

If someone told you that they had rebuilt a Nissan 4x4 truck to run with no internal combustion engine or fossil fuels, you would likely think that there's no conceivable way this could work.

And so did this writer. That is, until he saw it for himself.

Randy Nichols and Andrew Lamb of Unionville appear to have actually come up with a way of getting around without filling up the gas tank. And with this truck, there isn't much of a choice, because it doesn't have anyplace for the fuel.

"You could take this vehicle to California right now and never have to fill it up," Lamb says. "You never have to do anything to it."

This is a bold claim. But seeing is believing and the pair popped the hood to reveal the missing space. Just two car batteries, an AC/DC converter, a hydraulic motor, a small electric motor and various hoses are left sitting around the empty space which once housed the engine. The rear part of the truck has been stripped back to show no gas tank or exhaust system.

Rolling it off a trailer, the two hometown inventors wasted no time showing what it could do. Instead of the typical sound of an engine. there is a whining-type sound similar to a golf cart motor, but somewhat louder.

And sure enough, Lamb began to drive their prototype down the parking lot of Community School, just with the power generated by Nichols' and Lamb's contraption.

While it reached only about 10 MPH around the lot, Lamb asserts that they've clocked the truck at 42 MPH, adding that he needed to put a little more hydraulic fluid in it to get more pressure for better speed.

Nichols came up with the idea some seven years ago while working as an over-the-road truck driver. With nothing to do late at night, he began getting the idea for a vehicle without an engine.

"So I began writing them down drawing them out ... then I'd look at 'em the next day, say 'nah' and throw them out," he said.

It took several tries, but he came up with the basic concept and then worked on the blueprints for this invention for over six years. After that, he and Lamb have been working over the past year to put it all together.

This is how it works: A hydraulic pump forces the fluid to a hydraulic motor, turning the flywheel, which is what powers the vehicle in a gasoline engine.

"From the flywheel to the back, it's the same, nothing has been modified," Lamb said.

Taking the gas engine out, they installed a tiny DC motor on the flywheel, which powers the transmission and the vehicle. Lamb said the truck also has a complete charging system, which was the hardest part of the design, taking them about eight months to get right.

It is powered on a 24-volt system and the pair were reluctant to give away any more secrets, mainly due to the fact they haven't patented their invention yet.

"This thing can be modified to work on something as small as a motorcycle or a big as a tractor trailer," Lamb claims.

"I know this can be proved a thousand times," Nichols said, referring to their prototype.

Lamb added that they've put a lot of tears into the work. Some of the pieces were machined just for the invention, others are used parts you can find anywhere. They had to create their own ignition system for the truck.

The pair put the invention in the 4x4 to demonstrate that a larger vehicle could be powered by the system, stating that if they used a smaller car like a Geo, they wouldn't be taken seriously.

Lamb said once they hook up a larger DC engine to the flywheel, it will go faster than a gas powered vehicle. It goes pretty far on just $3 of hydraulic fluid rather than the same amount worth of gasoline, Lamb claims.

The two "country boys," as they call themselves, jokingly said they were worried that the gas companies would have them done away with if they became successful with the device.

"Look, gas is sky high," Nichols said. "And I've become one of these pollution freaks. You've got to fix it. No gas. No pollution."

"It's not the prettiest truck in the world," Lamb said. "But as you can see, it does work."


Comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on t-g.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

Howdy,

I've just been reading the article written on Tuesday, June 19, 2007 by Brian Mosely at http://www.t-g.com/story/1218203.html and I have to say it's interesting but there's a few things in the article that don't quite make sense. I'm hoping that someone can explain these. I'll just quote the pieces and make some comments.

"This is how it works: A hydraulic pump forces the fluid to a hydraulic motor, turning the flywheel, which is what powers the vehicle in a gasoline engine."

...

"Taking the gas engine out, they installed a tiny DC motor on the flywheel, which powers the transmission and the vehicle."

These two quotes state that the method used to provide drive to the flywheel are first "A hydraulic motor" and then "a tiny DC motor". Which one is it that actually does the work or is this just a misprint?

...

"They had to create their own ignition system for the truck."

This statement seems somewhat odd as it seems to indicate that there's some form of ignition going on somewhere. Generally ignition is used to describe some form of initial combustion. See http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q... for the dictionary term.

I'd like to believe this works but some of the statements made just don't add up.

-- Posted by slarty80 on Mon, Aug 27, 2007, at 7:58 PM

hydraulic power is not an energy source. it is a mode of transmission of power which is produced by by someother source (electricity is implied)which is not being accounted for by the "inventors. The flywheel in an internal combustion engine is also a mode of transmission (and storage)of an external source of energy, I am looking forward to T_G coverage of a test run to the coast,,either coast.

-- Posted by fnoblitt on Thu, Oct 11, 2007, at 7:49 PM

The " inventors" forgot to mention the source of energy to the hydraulic motor. hydraulic is not a power source it is a mode of transmission. I am looking forward to T-G coverage of the trip to California.

-- Posted by fnoblitt on Thu, Oct 11, 2007, at 7:56 PM

Have there been any further developments with this invention ??

I haven't heard anything more - did

it die ??

-- Posted by bc762 on Wed, Apr 23, 2008, at 3:17 PM


Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration. If you already have an account on this site, enter your username and password below. Otherwise, click here to register.

Username:

Password:  (Forgot your password?)

Your comments:
Please be respectful of others and try to stay on topic.