![]() Commissioner Bobby Vannatta makes a comment during the county Financial Management Committee meeting as Finance Director Robert Daniel looks on. (T-G Photo by John I. Carney) [Click to enlarge] [Order this photo] |
The county is projecting a 5-percent decrease in sales tax revenue next year, coupled with rising costs for fuel and food. The finance committee is trying to head off a general, countywide tax increase by cutting expenditures, and has asked departments to submit austerity budgets.
The funding of rural fire services has been a bone of contention between city and rural residents for decades, and was part of the subject of a lawsuit against the county on behalf of city taxpayers in the early 1990s.
Some city residents claim it is unfair for county property taxes paid by city residents to be used to pay for county services which operate primarily in the rural areas.
As a result of the lawsuit, the county spun off the county-owned fire department into an independent non-profit agency, Volunteer Fire Services Inc. (VFSI), but continued to fund it under a provision of state law which allowed the county to contribute to volunteer fire departments. VFSI has both volunteers and paid employees.
The county even set up a special fund to contribute to services like VFSI out of tax revenues which the county considered to be rurally generated.
Although the lawsuit was eventually settled, some city residents have continued to claim that there is a basic inequity.
Rural residents sometimes counter that it is the city's choice to have a higher level of fire protection and that the city benefits from rejecting county fire coverage and operating its own fire department in the form of lower homeowners' insurance premiums.
Tillett said that "situs-based" taxes -- tax revenue allocated to county government by the state solely on the basis of rural population, not counting city residents -- will only generate $641,806 in revenue in the coming fiscal year, compared to VFSI's projected budget of more than $1 million. If the 5-percent budget cuts being asked of county agencies are applied to VFSI, its operating budget would be $1,045,610 for the 2008-09 fiscal year. Tillett said he supports applying the $641,806 to VFSI and creating a rural fire tax district to raise the rest of the budget.
A rural fire tax district would place a special supplemental tax assessment on property outside city limits to pay for rural fire protection.
Because Tuesday's meeting was a study session only, no vote or action was taken. County Finance Director Robert Daniel said he would research what property tax rate would be required for a rural fire tax district to fund the roughly $400,000 required under Tillett's proposal.
In other discussion at Tuesday's study session:
Insurance bids
The committee heard additional information from Joe Hunt, of H.B. Cowan Insurance, and from John Evans, representing Tennessee Risk Management Trust, about the process by which bids were received for the county's worker's compensation and liability insurance. The bids, from two different insurance pools, both represented substantial savings over the rates the county had been paying.
Last week, the committee voted to buy the insurance directly from TRMT, the low bidder of the two pools, bypassing Hunt as a local agent. Hunt claimed that his work had been responsible for the low bid and that he provides good local service during the term of the coverage. Daniel claimed he had dealt directly with Tennessee Risk Management Trust in obtaining the bid.
There appeared to have been some misunderstandings between Daniel and Hunt over what Hunt was being asked to bid on, and Evans did say that Hunt's intervention was responsible for lowering the trust's bid, perhaps by $80,000 or $100,000, although he said it would be difficult to say with certainty by how much.
Hunt had originally told the county that TRMT did not deal directly with customers and only operated through agents, which turned out to be incorrect. Hunt said he had been misinformed.
Committee members acknowledged Hunt's contribution but said he probably couldn't claim to be responsible for the entire amount of the savings. And the committee said the county government has to look at saving every penny in the current environment.
"If Joe was on food stamps, I might look at it a little different," said Wilson. "The county is nearly on food stamps."
County salaries
County employees will likely have to do without a raise in the new fiscal year. The committee may consider a $200 one-time bonus at the start of the fiscal year, with another one at the end of the fiscal year if sales tax collections improve. That would be less expensive than a salary increase and wouldn't commit the county to any additional spending in future years.
BCEMS station
Bedford County Emergency Medical Services director Chad Graham suggested delaying the opening of the new BCEMS station and headquarters from October until January and said he felt comfortable increasing his revenue projections by $25,000 in order to help pay for six new employees who will be required to staff an ambulance at the new station 24 hours a day.
Finance committee members took no action but noted that even with Graham's suggestions, the cost of the six additional employees would further cut into a razor-thin balance projected for the county's general fund.


Yes I Agree that a majority are volunteers. But not many counties in the united states are fortunate enough to have the ability to have paid Fire service. I am not saying get rid of Volunteers I am saying to combine the paid services. You still use the volunteers in this county as they are used now. You are just allowing the paid services to respond to each others calls and increasing education for each fireman and EMS employee. Also you would spread your fire trucks throughout the county rather than house them in the city to have a 15 minute response time. it would be more like 8 min responce time. Fire doubles in size every 5 minutes.
BCRESIDENT
Since you were a fireman do you really think combining fire and EMS is the right thing to do? 70% of all fireman in America are volunteers. Can that many people be wrong? Just asking your opinion.
Flungpooh-
If you want to know how to lower your insurance rates maybe you should contact the water department and the county. For this county to lower their ISO Rating, which in turn determines insurance rates, They have to add about 200 fire hydrants. This county lacks water supply and that is resolved by hydrants, not only fire tankers. The Bell Buckle, Wartrace and immediate area around the city are the only locations that are properly populated with hydrants.
I am a former firefighter. I am involved enough to know about what equipment they have and how this county operates.
BCRESIDENT you seem to know a lot about fire fighting. How do you know all this?
Now that I have provided the problem shall I provide a solution.
Solution:
Combine Fire and EMS. Go to any other state and you will find that this is the best practice (Ex Texas, Florida, California, Virginia, Heck go to Wilson and Davidson county) You can have a fire truck stationed at every ambulance station. Four current stations and one opening by the end of the year. You put one fire man at every station along with that one ambulance. If a fire call goes out the ambulance and Fire truck respond and you have three personnel going to it along with volunteers. If a medical call goes out both still go and you have man power at every call.
All personnel would be cross trained in Fire and EMS. and that would allow for longer careers because of the manpower at every scene. Also you have the Fire Trucks scattered around the county which would lower response times.
You only have one department with one budget. It is the most cost effective and most effective for response.
The fire service in Bedford county has tried for two long to be like the big boys rather than buying equipment that is needed. The Engines that were bought in 1998 were adequate for this county and benefitted it greatly. Since then VFSI has gone crazy with the county spending.
Ex. 1 EVI Rescue Truck
To large for Bedford County. The same Service it provides could have been done by the new rescue truck they just purchased for a fifth of the cost. This Truck literally takes up most of the roadway at a majority of wreck scenes.
Ex. 2 2000 gallon tankers
These seven tankers were purchased last year for the purpose of increasing water supply for Structure Fire Response. These tanker cost the county 300,000 a piece x 7 tankers.
They were the top of the line vehicles with every bell and whistle you could have. You could buy adequate tankers for under 120,000 that would achieve the same goal of providing more water. The Engines bought in 1998 would provide the pump capacity needed at a Structure Fire. Water is needed more than pump capacity following the first attack Engine.
Ex. 3 75ft Ladder Truck
You tell me 20 houses in Bedford county taller than two stories. There are not any. The largest building in the county are located in the city. This was never needed for this county. To properly use this apparatus the house could not be more than 50 ft off of the roadway. Because if a house is 25 ft tall than the ladder only has 50 more feet of extension to fight the fire. This truck is to large to go down most driveways especially if they are paved. And most houses that are tall enough to need a ladder truck have paved driveways that are to narrow to drive down.
i agree. we absolutley do not need anymore taxes. i vote we let joe tillet pay the shortage, what do you think about that joe?
i live in the city myself and think im paying too much for city and county taxes. i do have one idea. lets take that useless piece of machinery called a street sweeper and sell it. i have never seen enough trash on the side of the sidewalks the requires the use of a street sweeper. how about the hundreds of times ive seen county police cars traveling down the highways and county roads way way way over the speed limit. even with red and blue lights blazing its really not neccessary to go 80-100 mph to a call is it? thats a waste of $4.00 a gallon fuel dont ya think? and no raise for the county employees? who brain child is that. a 200 dollar bonus for not getting a raise. ok, what the county does is give you the 200 bucks then tax it. so they end up with 150 buck, woohoo! i can tell you really care for county employees. oh yeah lets by the cheapest insurance we can so the county employees will have less coverage, have to pay more out of pocket when they can afford to go to the doctor. im just sick of all the cuts myself
The volunteers need all the help that they can get. They spend their own money running their cars and trucks to fires. It really cost each and everyone of them a lot of money out of their pockets. EMS should take over all wrecks and rescues and that would let VFSI reduce man power and save money since no one is complaining about their budget.
The volunteers are the best thing that this county has and can use all the help that they can get. I would bet that each one of them spend more out of their pocket than most people pay in taxes each year.
Does anyone know the city fire dept. budget? They have a couple of stations and they may have one at the airport (not sure). I would be willing to bet their budget is much higher but i could be completely of base. They have less stations and a smaller area to cover but I bet they have a larger budget. I know for a fact they pay their volunteers.
The county volunteers work for absolutely nothing. So campbellkc says he will no longer give a donation. I hope your talking about VFSI in town and not a local volunteer station. the volunteers already work for free and now you want to make it that much harder. GREAT IDEA?????
I can't believe we are talking about cutting a corner on the safety of our own residents. I find it hard to believe we can't find other places to make cuts and save money.
If you look at the VFSI budget of approximately $1,000,000, I believe you will see that it does not include the cost of all these new fire trucks. Why are we paying for them with money that's not in their budget? All the other county agencies, as far as I know, have to purchase their equipment out of their budgets. Why not do this with VFSI and lets see what they are truly costing the county. A millon dollars won't touch it! When are the elected officials going to hear us..."we don't want more taxes and we don't need more services". Especially without seeing some results. You keep piling up burdens on a pack-mule and he'll eventually lay down and leave the whole bunch walking.
We need less taxes not more taxes!!!!
If you have a fire tax district, then all paid employees should be stationed outside of the city, so you can do away with station 1. I also always give to our volunteer fire dept. and I will not pay extra taxes plus donate.
Can you give everyone in the county the same service and same response time? If you can't then you shouldn't tax them all the same, sounds like a good reason for another law suit.
Everyone has their hand out. We Americans are very tried of being nickle and dimed at every corner. If you all pass this you can bet you won't be in office next time around and for the VFSI I always give a donation to you every year if this passes you should not show up on my door step because you won't get one here.
Perhaps there should be a charge for the city residents that choose to carry their trash to the convenience centers -- located out in the "county" when they have garbage pickup at their front doors. We taxpayers in the county don't have that service.
Is the article above trying to state that no one living in the city will pay taxes that will pay for county fire protection? If that is the case anyone who lives inside the city limits of Shelbyville and has wreck in the county should be given a bill from VFSI for them working the accident. Why should county taxes pay for protection of city residents traveling outside the city. You may say that county residents get city protection when inside the city limits. The difference is county residents pay for that protection. The last time I checked, every tax dollar I spend at Wal-Mart, restaurants and fast food went directly to the city. If you ask me it's the county carrying the heavy load. If you travel into any city in America you are being protected by all their emergency personnel without paying a dime of taxes to that community. I think the commissioners are splitting hairs again and probably going to spend about $400,000 in lawyer fees.
Why has VFSI been able to purchase however many firetrucks they want with my tax dollars and my fire insurance rating doesn't change? Seems to me VFSI has had the vault opened up to them for too long already. Let's see some results for the money we're spending. All the other county agencies have to justify there expenses, now it's finally VFSI's turn and it's long overdue. Thank you commissioners.
Hey, Guys - NO NEW TAXES! Taxpayers are sick of this foolishness - show us that you feel our pain or we will show you at the ballot box!