Login | Register
A Few Clouds ~ 87°F  
[Shelbyville Times-Gazette]
Shelbyville, Tennessee ~ Monday, September 8, 2008
Print Email link Respond to editor Read comments (6)

Engineers fear building will collapse

Wednesday, July 23, 2008
Engineers are worried about the possibility of "immediate collapse" of a building off the public square on East Depot Street that has been deemed unsafe for human habitation by the City of Shelbyville.

Part of the sidewalk at 109 E. Depot St. is blocked by barrels and yellow caution tape to keep pedestrians out of the area where bricks have already fallen from the facade of the building.

A pair of civil engineers have examined the structure and are "both concerned about its immediate collapse," said planning and codes director Kip Green.

The city is in the process of acquiring estimates to either demolish the building or stabilize it, Green said. Specialized contractors would be required to perform that type of recovery because an adjoining piece of property shares a common wall with the failing structure, he said.

Green says another problem is that the alley which separates the building from the structure housing the Center for Family Development contains a great number of public utilities.

Codes official Scotty Farrar said in April the building was declared dangerous when its condition was brought to the city's attention in March at the request of owner Alice Albright, who was said to be having "some issues" with a tenant.

Upon entry to the building, Farrar noticed serious structural deficiencies, which caused him to declare it dangerous. The walls are damaged and the roof is sagging by several feet due to water that has accumulated over the years.

Green said when engineers recently inspected the building, they took one look at the roof and refused to walk upon it.

Under the legal process, the city had to give the owner 60 days to take action by repairing or demolishing the building. But that deadline has come and gone and Green said that the city has had no further contact with Albright, who resides in Alaska.

"We've had no official word from her," Green said. After getting all the necessary information together about the structure, the city would be able to proceed to the courts to start the demolition process.


Comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable.

The city has to work thru a legal process regarding this building. The fact that it was declared DANGEROUS shows that the city is attempting to do what is in the public's best interest. The Codes Department has been working this case to its best capability.

Action will be taken to ensure public safety, with keeping in mind that it's important to save historical structures on the square or adjacent to it, if at all possible.

-- Posted by Brett Favre on Thu, Jul 24, 2008, at 6:58 PM

What ever is planned for this building should get done right away so no one will get hurt if this building should start to fall down....They have known about this for some time and should have kept in close touch with the ownwer all along to see if she had decided what she was going to do ...instead of waiting...I believe it would be wonderful to save the building....But they may have waited to long now to save it...Right now the most important thing is to play it safe so no one will get hurt from walking around the building or working near it...I hope they just get the job done and not waste time talking about it....GET IT DONE

-- Posted by rebelrose on Thu, Jul 24, 2008, at 6:53 AM

grandpat,

Are YOU willing to put up a few million to maintain this building? Didn't think so. Anyone else willing to put up their money to keep this building? Didn't think so. Knock it down.

-- Posted by Evil Monkey on Wed, Jul 23, 2008, at 9:37 PM

Maintenance and rehab should be a prority before it comes to this.

Safety,aesthetics and function all suggest that owners be enabled to preserve a structure and keep it occupied for as long as possible.

I understand that,at one time,Ms. Albright was going to restore the building and even hire local caretakers/supervisors to see that it did not deteriorate further or become hazardous.

The "issues with a former tenant" and the condition of the building may have made such a plan unfeasable.

When a building is left unoccupied or unmaintained,it can become derelict and so decrepit that it can't earn its keep.

At a time when sound historical structures are razed or remuddled,what chance does a place have when it would be cheaper to replace it than rebuild and when it might be too fragile to even reclaim its parts for architectural salvage?

-- Posted by quantumcat on Wed, Jul 23, 2008, at 6:05 PM

PRESERVATION OF OUR BUILDINGS,ESPECIALLY THE PUBLIC SQUARE AREA ,IS IMPORTANT TO MAINTAINING AN IDENTITY WITH OUR HISTORY AND WITH OURSELVES.THOSE WHO ARE SEEKING DESTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHOULD ALSO HAVE A PLAN TO SAVE AND RESTORE THIS BUILDING.WHAT WILL REPLACE THIS BUILDING,OR WILL IT BE LEFT AS A HOLE ON THE SQUARE???

-- Posted by grandpat on Wed, Jul 23, 2008, at 2:55 PM

There are plenty of old, ugly, and essentially useless eyesores in and around that area that should be demolished. There is nothing left to preserve when the buildings have already begun falling in...

-- Posted by darrick_04 on Wed, Jul 23, 2008, at 11:09 AM


Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration. If you already have an account on this site, enter your username and password below. Otherwise, click here to register.

Username:

Password:  (Forgot your password?)

Your comments:
Please be respectful of others and try to stay on topic.