Shelbyville, Tennessee · Sunday, November 8, 2009
[SeMissourian.com] Fair ~ 73°F  
High: 76°F ~ Low: 48°F
Print Email link Respond to editor Read comments (12) Share link

Bailey seeks North Main site for child care

Thursday, March 5, 2009

(Photo)
Carl Bailey
(T-G file photo)
[Click to enlarge] [Order this photo]
A local homeless advocate is asking the Shelbyville City Council Tuesday for the use of the old Child Development Center on North Main Street again -- this time, to use as a child care facility.

But some council members want to sell the property in question and put it on the tax rolls.

Last summer, Dr. Carl Bailey asked the city to rezone property on North Main for a proposed homeless shelter and child care center, but the council took issue with the location rather than the concept and did not give its approval.

But now that the shelter itself has gotten off the ground in a different location and is serving the homeless, Bailey said in a letter to the council that he wants to revisit the child care idea with the property at 106 N. Main.

The concept is to offer low cost child care services for primarily "at-or-below-poverty level" single parent families.

Bailey says that managing the child care costs would allow parents to seek employment and return to the role of a productive member of society as opposed to being a welfare recipient.

He added that following discussions with the state's department of Children's Services, "we believe there is a strategy available for the provision of child care for about $50 per week."

"With this reduced payment structure, the 'at-or-below-poverty level' community will be able to seek employment with the ultimate goal of returning to a fruitful and productive place in society," Bailey said.

But councilman Al Stephenson said that the city "needs to get together with the county and sell it," referring to the property Bailey wants to utilize.

The city and county jointly own the building that once housed the Child Development Center.

Council member Kay Rose mentioned that the reason the building is no longer in use was due to "fire issues" a decade or more ago.

City manager Ed Craig told the council there had been discussions about selling the deep but narrow lot, but to do so with a neighboring piece of property that has been bequeathed to the county's library, but is still held by the current owners.

The idea was to combine the sale of the two parcels when the second one became available "and get a much greater bang for our buck," Craig said.

"I agree it ought to be sold," Craig said.

Bailey explained that in its first two months, the newly formed CROSS (Community Religious Outreach Social Services) shelter has served six children, eight women and 18 men, as well as two of the six families that requested assistance.

He added that families are harder to serve due to the shelter's space limitations, but they can currently hold a total of 20 people.

While the mission of the shelter is primarily focused on sheltering, feeding and rehabilitation, Bailey said CROSS also provides limited shelter and food for homeless transients when requested by law enforcement.

Bailey pointed out four success stories they've had in the two months the shelter has been in operation, men that have been retrained, found jobs and have now moved into their own residences "as fruitful and contributing member of the community."

CROSS is also working on expanding its service program and wishes to form a collaborative effort with area churches to provide a community food distribution operation by consolidating the individual actions of many churches.

Another idea is the development of a partnership with utility service providers where CROSS could serve as a referral service for churches. Bailey said that rising utility costs "are now frequently instrumental in causing homelessness."

The service would review and screen applicants to pick those that match critical family profiles indicating the highest needed for financial assistance in getting utilities turned on and maintained.

Bailey also said that CROSS has been providing a ride to work program and there will be a projected need for the program as the shelter capacity grows.

One more idea Bailey wrote about is the new Shelbyville Garden of Life program. Working with members of the community and participating churches, the program has the goal of growing food for the shelters and the hungry of Bedford County.

"This program was formed as a result of the strong belief that economic conditions will get worse before they get better," Bailey said.


Comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on t-g.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

When did we get into the welfare business? We can't afford the services we have now, must less giving away property for child care. And most who would qualify for child care also quality for public assistance through DHS. As part of that, low cost child care is included in that public assistance. Therefore, there is no need for Bedford County to provide even more child care.

-- Posted by sameoldstory on Thu, Mar 5, 2009, at 11:04 AM

That's the problem with the people in this town. Only thinking of self and not of others who are struggling. I think it's a great idea and thank you Mr. Bailey for caring enough to try to help these people out.

-- Posted by poochie82 on Thu, Mar 5, 2009, at 11:33 AM

I sure dont object to the idea and no doubt a number of residents here would enjoy volunteering to help too !

Prime, on the square, property sure isnt the place for it.

Further, I would make legal status checking mandatory. The illegals STILL here now steal enough from US citizens.

Housing, food, schooling, JOBS !! Noo need to add next to free childcare for kids shouldnt be here anyway.

-- Posted by BobM on Thu, Mar 5, 2009, at 12:00 PM

Everyone is "struggling" and Bedford County is just starting to feel their itch in the problems that effect everyone. All I am saying is that these services are in place NOW. Why do we need to put more taxpayer money into this issue. First we HAD to have a homeless shelter. Next he is saying he must have a child care center. What's next.... we must HAVE a soup kitchen? We are not Nashville or Murfreesboro. We don't have the resources for this. We sure don't have the money to hire new court staff, jail staff, law enforcement or social workers to deal with these types of people. I am still wanting to know who the people are in the shelter now. Are they truly from Bedford County or another county?

-- Posted by sameoldstory on Thu, Mar 5, 2009, at 1:54 PM

Now...if you told me the shelter was getting support from Tysons to provide jobs for these people, then I would be all for it. Also, has Mr Bailey went to the businesses like Tyson's and asked for money? Everything I read is him comeing to the county for funds and buildings.

-- Posted by sameoldstory on Thu, Mar 5, 2009, at 1:56 PM

This is just the kind of Socialism that has driven California into bankrupcy. Do we really want to go there.

-- Posted by MyMrMarty on Thu, Mar 5, 2009, at 3:26 PM

Men and women on government assistance shouldn't be having children. If you can't provide for them, don't have them. If you don't have them you won't need child care. Pretty simple to me.

-- Posted by ontheoutside on Thu, Mar 5, 2009, at 3:40 PM

So, people who have children but have lost their jobs and homes...what are they supposed to do with their children?

Some people don't want others on welfare, but they don't want to help them work? What are you supposed to do with your kids if you get a job? You can't take them with you. If you get a job making $200 a week and you have to spend more than half on childcare, it isn't going to work out.

What piece of property are they talking about? I can't place it...

-- Posted by Jacks4me on Thu, Mar 5, 2009, at 4:18 PM

Just by reading most of these comments I see it is still all about me me me me. How does this affect ME?

Exactly what is in the old Child Development Center? NOTHING it is just sitting there rotting away just like the many other building we have here in town. Please explain to me how this will cost you, the taxpayer one red penny more.

-- Posted by Dianatn on Thu, Mar 5, 2009, at 4:46 PM

Jacks.... this should help.

http://maps.live.com/#JnE9eXAuMTA2K04lND...

-- Posted by BobM on Fri, Mar 6, 2009, at 9:01 AM

Dianatn.... yes it does cost the taxpayers now. If the city can sell it, then we can use that money for other things. If we just give it away, we lost money.

And for those who talk about needing child care if they go back to work...where were the kids staying before they lost their job? I work and have kids. I have to arrange for their care. Will someone proved me free child care? if so, please tell me because it will save me alot of money.

I just get tired of people thinking that government is the answer to all problems. What happend with taking care of your own problems without the need of public assistance?

-- Posted by sameoldstory on Fri, Mar 6, 2009, at 1:35 PM

What kind of "DR" is Mr. Bailey? I understand he wants to "cure" all of society's ills, but free hand-outs is not always the solution. Yes, I understand that the homeless shelter has been relocated, and I also understand that several people in the vacinity where the shelter is located are constantly harassed by drunken residents seeking more hand-outs. There are licensed day care facilities already in operation in Bedford County who participate in the DHS program which provides day care for welfare recipients who are working or going to school. If these low income people already qualify for assistance, then why should the County compete with private or non-profit established businesses who are already providing the same service. It doesn't seem fair to those businesses who have to pay rent or mortgages, business taxes and licenses, pay for personnel to meet adult-child ratios established by the state, provide training, meals and a host of other services that are costly, yet they must also compete with the County who is providing a free place and volunteer help. When these volunteers realize how much training and certification is required for childcare, they may decide they don't have THAT much time and energy to volunteer. I applaud Mr. Bailey for his compassion and concern, but if America hasn't learned by now that the welfare way is not a perfect way, then there is no hope for any of us.

-- Posted by writeattitude on Fri, Mar 6, 2009, at 2:48 PM


Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration. If you already have an account on this site, enter your username and password below. Otherwise, click here to register.

Username:

Password:  (Forgot your password?)

Your comments:
Please be respectful of others and try to stay on topic.