Sides square off over nursing home bill

Thursday, March 12, 2009
By John I. Carney

State Sen. Jim Tracy
[Order this photo]

State Sen. Jim Tracy says a bill he is co-sponsoring would help improve patient care by lowering liability insurance costs for nursing homes. Critics, however, say the bill would make it harder to hold nursing homes accountable for error and is backed by nursing home operators who made campaign contributions to its sponsors.

Tracy is a Republican from Shelbyville.

The bill, introduced by Tracy in the Senate and by State Rep. Randy Rinks (D-Savannah) in the House, places nursing homes under the same guidelines as other medical malpractice cases, which means that attorneys' fees for such cases would be limited. It allows nursing homes to require that new incoming patients agree to arbitration of any patient care disputes. Existing patients would not be affected, only those admitted after the bill becomes law.

It limits non-economic damages (such as damages for pain or emotional distress) in nursing home malpractice cases, setting a limit similar to that currently in place for worker's compensation cases. Economic damages -- damages which can be measured and quantified -- would not be limited.

Tracy said Tennessee has the second-highest per-bed liability in the nation, adding $4,500 per year to the cost of a nursing home bed. Tracy said that if that money didn't have to be spent on insurance, it could be spent on patient care.

"That is the whole reason for the bill," he said. "To me, it's all about patient care -- trying to improve the quality of care in nursing homes."

A report released Wednesday by AARP Tennessee, which opposes the bill, says that damage limits don't appear to reduce litigation costs. AARP commissioned the report, which was prepared by The Lewin Group, a Virginia-based health care policy and consulting firm.

"Nursing home representatives say such lawsuits take funds that otherwise would be spent on care, but the report found no evidence to support that suggestion," states an AARP news release.

The lobbying group Tennessee Citizen Action, and a reporter/blogger for the alternative weekly newspaper Nashville Scene, have been sharply critical of the bill, going so far as to publicize one legislator's dubbing it the "kill old people cheap act."

"This bill is one of the most outrageous and extreme examples of corporate greed and political over-reaching that we have ever seen," said Tom Peters, of Tennessee Citizen Action, in a news release.

Jim Woods, of the Nashville Scene, pointed out in a blog entry that the various sponsors of the bill received campaign contributions from National Health Corp., a nursing home operator which favors the bill.

According to the state election finance web site, NHC's political action committee gave $5,000 to Tracy's campaigns in 2007, $4,000 in 2008 and $5,000 this year.

Tracy told the Times-Gazette that NHC's contributions to his campaigns were not surprising and denied they had anything to do with his sponsorship of the bill.

"They're a big employer in my district," Tracy told the Times-Gazette. He said that out-of-state trial lawyers are opposing the nursing home legislation.

"The problem is that our laws right now allow the filing of limitless lawsuits claiming tens of millions of dollars in damages," said Steve Flatt, of NHC, in a news release. "The result is that the big-money personal injury lawyers from Texas and Florida have been arriving regularly to pelt our courts with lawsuits."

However, Tennessee Citizen Action said residents' ability to sue for damages is needed in Tennessee, saying the state is "almost dead last" in providing quality of care for senior citizens in nursing homes. It has also had what TCA calls a record number of homes cited for repeated violations by state regulators.

AARP says that increased staffing, better oversight and licensing of smaller facilities are keys to improving nursing home care in Tennessee.

Comments

Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on t-g.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

"lowering liability insurance costs for nursing homes".....does benefit the insurance companies. law suits are a check against mal-practice or negligence related to poor care given. look at NHC's past records of patient negligence/abuse.

-- Posted by doc_ed on Thu, Mar 12, 2009, at 12:50 PM

There must be ways to save costs for nursing homes other than reducing premiums for negligence and neglect. How about payments to legislators and lobbyists? If Tennessee were not in the bottom in terms of quality of care, Tracy's bill might have credence. He has such a pitiful group to work with in terms of willingness to meet standards.

Tracy could do better to move the state in a positive direction to improve quality.

He has apparently made the decision that to let old people die from negligence is better public policy than to improve their lives. Shame.

I am old, and I would prefer to die from my own neglect than to do so, giving a profit in the process to a Nursing Home.

Yes, NHC is a big employer. I know people who will not work for them. Organized crime is a big employer also........maybe their campaign contributions haven't been large enough? Where are your ethics, Senator?

-- Posted by Zrcrxinsk on Sun, Mar 15, 2009, at 11:52 AM