![]() |
|
Bell Buckle Planning Commission Chairman Rodney Simmons shows the gray area where the Urban Growth Boundary would be if it included all Bell Buckle water lines. The yellow area represents the current UGB. From left are Simmons, Kristin Costanzo of the state planning department, water and sewer supervisor Ronnie Lokey, planning commissioner David Robinson, Mayor Dennis Webb, planning commissioner Gayle Winnett and Alderman Frank Reagor. (T-G Photo by Mary Reeves) [Order this photo] |
Rumors of a developer interested in "The Hill" prompted Bell Buckle Planning Commission Chairman Rodney Simmons to suggest annexing the area. The same rumor was why Mayor Dennis Webb asked the commission to wait.
"It's something that needs to be looked at but now is not the time," said Webb. "I think an attempt to annex now would smack of political correctness. I would like to find out what's going on out there."
Simmons said he would like to see the area, which lies just beside and behind Highway 82 Market, annexed because then the city would have some control over what was built.
"I'd like to see something nicer than what we've got now," he said.
Gayle Winnett, a member of the planning commission, agreed and said she thought an attempt to annex the property would meet resistance from the property owners because they would be facing city taxes.
"Actually, it's a net gain for them," said Simmons. Although they would be paying city taxes, their water bill would be reduced to city rates, saving them more money than they would spend on the taxes, he said. In addition, the town would be required over time, through its plan of service, to improve the roads, and the water and sewer.
The costs involved with the annexation were another reason Webb suggested caution, as well as a potential for legal action if the town wasn't able to provide or improve those services as soon as the property owners thought they should.
Ronnie Lokey, head of the water and sewer department, said a previous study done on annexing the area revealed that for every dollar in taxes brought in, $7 would be spent by the city. One commissioner said that bringing The Hill and the substandard roads in would bring in more federal grant money to improve the area.
"I just don't want to rush in," said Webb before the commission left the matter and moved on to other topics.
"It would be like we were trying to push it through," said Winnett.
Overreach or withdraw?
Kristin Costanzo, of the state planning department, presented several maps to the commission outlining current and proposed Urban Growth Boundaries. One map showed the UGB extended to cover all water lines owned by the town.
"I think people will think we're overreaching," said David Robinson, a member of the committee. He said he was concerned about the farmers and the other property owners thinking that Bell Buckle was trying to control what they could do with their land too much.
Alderman Frank Reagor, also a member of the commission, suggested pulling the current Urban Growth boundary in, not expanding it. He said the UGB was supposed to include a "reasonable" growth plan for the town over then next 10 years.
"Personally, I just don't see it growing that much," he said, pointing at the revised map.
Webb brought forth pros and cons on the matter of a large UGB, such as the ability to annex UGB land by vote instead of referendum; and "captured" tax dollars. He reminded the commission that the town cannot be forced to extend water lines, in or out of a UGB, which gives the town some control over subdivision development.
The negative aspects of the large UGB are, he said, that the county has to approve it.
"If other muncipalities or the county think we're overreaching, there could be some pushback," said Webb. "We could get some pushback from the owners."
He said they needed to find out from the county if septic tank effluent pumping (STEP) systems for water would be allowed in UGBs, which could affect the growth control Bell Buckle has via its water service.
Simmons suggested everyone bring maps back to the next meeting with their own idea of what the UGB should be for discussion. He said they should be able to come up with a recommendation for the board of mayor and aldermen at that time.
Zoned in
The Planning Commission did vote to recommend a historic overlay district for the downtown area to the board of mayor and aldermen at the April 14 meeting. The district would only affect architecture, said Simmons, and not other zoning issues, such as whether or not the building was used as a retail business. The motion made by the board said the overlay would apply only to the C-1 and C-2 businesses in the area, and not residential buildings.
"Unless they want to be included," added Simmons.
Other business
The commission approved a recommendation to the board granting Kelly Wilson a water tap on his Highway 82 property, as well as a site permit for Randy Simpson, subject to change.
Simpson, who is wanting to build a carport/garage combination on his Liberty Pike property, was asked to move the location of the proposed structure five or six feet away from the lot line. His driveway currently runs along the lot line but zoning requires outbuildings be at least five feet from the line. Simpson agreed to the request.
![[SeMissourian.com]](http://www.t-g.com/images/nameplate.png)


Dagnabbit people, leave The Hill alone!!!!! You don't need to get your greedy hands into everything. You've already taken away any uniqueness the town of Bell Buckle had and turned it into a Branson wanna-be. Enough!!
Bell Buckle is the only place I know that gets upset when growth and development are mentioned. Maybe they should focus more on retaining business in their little community and upkeep the area better instead of limiting themselves.
They are such an enigma.
BTW . . . does anyone know why they charged an extra $2.00 fee on the water bill for outside maintenance (OM)? It would be nice if they explained such charges before adding them.
jaxpike,
The OM (operations and maintenance) fee is assesed on all water taps ($1 in-town, $2 out-of-town). The water service has been running a deficit for the last few years, and this fee is designed to help balance the fund's budget.
This fee was discussed and explained in detail at the last two meeting of the Mayor and Aldermen.
James
Thanks James . . . unfortunately most people don't attend those meetings (I live in Wartrace). It would have helped if they would have explained the charge somewhere on the bill itself or sent a letter out. I was just asking though for clarification and wasn't making an issue out of it . . . I just wanted to know the reason for it since I was paying it. :-)
I haven't been there in a while (about 10-15 years). Can you still buy moon.-liquer up there?
Just when you think Bell Buckle can't get anymore strange....
Bell Buckle has always demonstrated a bit of a "separatist" attitude with regard to the rest of Bedford County, but it's really getting quite strange up there.
Bell Buckle has existed since 1852 and has been incorporated in 1856. Tennessee Code Annotated 6-21-601 has been in place since 1921. That particular code section states "The city manager shall appoint a chief of police and such patrol officers and other members of the police force as may be provided by ordinance."
Why then did Bell Buckle only get around to hiring a police chief last year? Why is this officer not working full-time? As a related question, why did the council go all the way to Smyrna the first time, and Grundy County this time to find a Police Chief?
It seems to me the city council needs to address the service requirements already in place before they get worried about annexing a demographically challenged block of housing purely to generate tax income. Let's face it, if a developer was not looking at developing that area, I seriously doubt the council would be considering annexing it.
Bell Buckle is not a sovereign state and no amount of political maneuvering can make it so.
Does no one want to tell the real reason the "Hill" has not been incorporated? Was there not a law on the books? Do I hear an apoligy coming?
The Hill? I forgot about that place. Often visited by the Bedford County Sheriff's Dept.
I can tell you exactly why the "hill" was never
annexed. The state offices determined that it was
not cost effective. A comment was made that there
was nothing on that hill that could get back the tax revenue that would have to be put out to annex these properites.
To mark-greeting: Not sure about moon-shine but you sure can obtain drugs there.
Bell Buckle is not a sovereign state and no amount of political maneuvering can make it so.
-- Posted by Schooldaze on Fri, Apr 3, 2009, at 12:57 PM
But you have to give them an A for their effort of trying to be their special little thing.
They would love to be in a state of privatized title.
I don't think the residents of the hill have to worry about annexation though. The snoots that are in a state of delusional fantasy running Bell Buckle are not going to be receptive to having the "hill" as part of their makeup. They had rather remain ugly without the "color" of the makeup.
After all they do have "Webb" and "moon pies" to toot.
The fact that most property in this country is suffering in value and Bell Buckle property continues to sell well should tell you something! Most of us that "actually" live here feel it's a special place and we have every right to try and keep it that way!
I question why a person who does not even LIVE in Bell Buckle - merely owns an eyesore of one of the many empty storefronts, and an empty lot that he won't keep mowed- is chairman of the town planning commission?? He seems to have alot of say in the town business for a non resident. The current crew who run the town are, for the most part, an embarrassment to the actual residents. And why are they trying nonstop to turn the town into a tacky joke? Don't they have their own hometowns to screw up? Just go back to wherever you all came from- if they'll have you that is.
Dear "not amused".....What have YOU done to keep Bell Buckle a good place to live? Any board or committee work? It's easy to criticize in a forum like this without your identity attached. How long does one have to live in Bell Buckle before they're entitled to an opinion? 10 years, 20 years....whats the magic number?
ralphsview,
Haven't you heard....opinions are like elbows....most everybody has at least one.
All of the developers and people from the bigger towns who have DISCOVERED and RUINED the uniqueness of Bell Buckle over the last several years need to move on. There has already been enough damage with your big brick homes on 2 acres or less of land and your snooty attitudes as if you have lived there your entire lives. Now if you buy out "The Hill" you are running people off from there that themselves or their family has lived there for generations. Anyone who has lived in Bell Buckle can see where this is going. The people will be bought out to leave, the developers will bulldover every structure up there to the ground and we will see more antique malls that never get any business and a quaint little coffee shop and another resturant trying to compete with the Bell Buckle Cafe. The developers and people who are suddenly deciding "hey I want to raise my kids in a Norman Rockwell town", are running the show and the long time residents (which not many of them are left are just sitting back and watching it happen.