*
Bedford Ramblings
Steve Mills

How do we protect ourselves from terrorists while protecting our freedom as well?

Posted Wednesday, January 14, 2015, at 8:35 PM
Comments
View 51 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • Fear is the problem. Like FDR said "All we have to fear is fear itself". The terrorist all have one thing in common. Should be fairly easy to figure out who they are. What else do you need to know?

    -- Posted by Liveforlight on Wed, Jan 14, 2015, at 9:01 PM
  • I am not sure I understand much about the previous post in regards to solving the terrorist problem except that fear is a major tool they use. Hence the word terrorist coming from terror, which is fear.

    How does that give us a plan to defend ourselves? How do we remove the fear?

    -- Posted by stevemills on Thu, Jan 15, 2015, at 10:46 AM
  • Fear can paralyze us, we have to take action. The terrorist are all Muslims. This provides a good starting point for a profile. While profiling is being condemned out of fear of political correctness, we should be developing a profile of who is likely to commit the terrorist acts and be prepared to take action against them. One good example was the young man caught yesterday planning a terrorist attack. If similar actions had been taken, we may have prevented the Boston bombing.

    Pretty simple, not easy, but simple.

    -- Posted by Liveforlight on Thu, Jan 15, 2015, at 10:59 AM
  • Steve,

    Some of my friends will disagree but I believe some information should not be made public.... Particularly the example you have used to make your point.

    -- Posted by Palindrome on Thu, Jan 15, 2015, at 1:10 PM
  • Too much transparency can take away the element of surprise. The media could be partly responsible for that. And of course I agree that groups like ISIS and Al Qaeda are still a threat, we've got other issues right here at home. Just since 1980 almost 300 people (mostly children) have been killed in school shootings. And we have some terrorists of our own. Just like Muslim extremists, there are Christian extremists. http://www.alternet.org/tea-party-and-right/10-worst-terror-attacks-extreme-Chri...

    -- Posted by Rocket Valentine on Thu, Jan 15, 2015, at 1:20 PM
  • And there are extremists who do not attribute their views to any religion. They are just terrorists.

    So I firmly believe we do NOT "need to know" how our authorities are gathering their information. Does it infringe on my freedom? Maybe, but I am not doing anything illegal and am not associating with extremists.

    I have more concern that we find ways to foil their plots. Investigative reporters should time-stamp their discovery so they can claim they knew about it (LATER). I would rather get credit for keeping my mouth shut than exposing it and assisting the perpetrators.

    Talk about aiding and abetting!

    -- Posted by stevemills on Thu, Jan 15, 2015, at 1:38 PM
  • Martin Luther King said "it is not a matter of extremism, but what kind if extremist we will be." This seems appropriate as we honor him on Monday.

    -- Posted by Liveforlight on Thu, Jan 15, 2015, at 2:47 PM
  • Good point. Extremism can bring about change for the better but violent extremism does little to bring about positive change.

    -- Posted by stevemills on Fri, Jan 16, 2015, at 9:46 AM
  • Like the Pope said "no ones religion is funny."I believe in freedom of speech and there are consequences in place to protect people from crossing the line.I think France went to far.Our government has exceptions to allow people to be held legally accountable for their words.Every thing we say is not protected by the First Ammendment,such as some hate speeches and threats.Not all terrorist are Muslims as Liveforlight stated,some wear white sheets and call themselves Christians.That makes it hard to develop a profile.Did Timothy McVeigh fit the profile?Someone on Fox news made the comment "It is hard to tell a terrorist now because they aren't the right color".What does that mean?If France is so concerned with freedom of speech why arrest Muslims for speaking out?I wonder if they still think it is funny and worth maybe a war.

    -- Posted by lets be real on Mon, Jan 19, 2015, at 11:51 PM
  • I should not have said all terrorist are Muslim. My apologies. Obviously, there are others. However, in recent years, Islam is what most of these terror attacks have in common.

    McVeigh is often cited as a terrorist, and he was. Rocket Valentine posted a link above to "10 of the Worst Terror Attacks by Extreme Christians and Far-Right White Men". This info highlights white Christian terrorist. However, the span of time goes all the way back to 1984. If all we were talking about was a dozen attacks, mostly lone wolf attackers, over a span of 31 yrs, like these, then developing a profile would be hard.

    Now, I will be the first to admit that the media is biased as to what they report. But, what we are seeing now is overwhelming reports of Muslim carrying out "Holy Jihad" in the form of organized terrorism while their "parent" organizations applaud their actions.

    No one deserves to be killed, or even punched in the face, for what they say, write, or express. There should be some legal remedy if their is false accusation, slander, or vocal threats perhaps, but not ridicule. Jesus did not teach to punch someone if they insult your mother, neither should the pope. Justifying such action is much more dangerous than protecting free speech.

    -- Posted by Liveforlight on Tue, Jan 20, 2015, at 7:32 PM
  • Here is a link to the number of Muslim attacks in The U.S. (only the U.S) This goes back to 1973, (42 yrs.) The number of killed is 4677. The number of injured is 1592 for a total of 6269 casualties. An average of 149/yr. Compare this to the numbers presented above and decide where our attention should be focused.

    http://www.politicalislam.com/jihad-in-amer-2/

    -- Posted by Liveforlight on Tue, Jan 20, 2015, at 8:14 PM
  • Liveforlight, I think the mistake you and many others make is to condemn Islam, and Muslims in general, for the small percentage of extremists that promote violence. The "Army of God" is a Christian terrorist group. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Army_of_God_%28United_States%29 Also, the KKK and white supremacist groups all proclaim their Christian heritage and these groups use bible scriptures to justify their hatred and violence. Should people also condemn Christianity for the acts of these people? I find it ironic that you qoute F.D.R. about the use of "fear", and then post a link written by "Bill Warner". His real name is Bill French, and he makes his living spreading religious hate. http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-report/browse-all-issues/2011.... I would take any of his "facts" with a very large grain of salt. That article lists many deaths that were caused by Muslims that also could be considered "lone wolf" killers too. If that's the case we could also talk about people such as the BTK killer, who was a devout Christian and was the President of his church council. Or the "Son of Sam" killer that proclaimed to be a "born again" Christian. I think the chance of encountering someone like that in our daily lives is just as likely as a Muslim extremist.

    -- Posted by Rocket Valentine on Wed, Jan 21, 2015, at 11:28 AM
  • Good points RV. I think we should be looking at all such terrorists with the emphasis placed on the higher number of incidents and the ideologies behind them. Maybe just media biase, but the greater number certainly seems to be Muslim. Not to say they don' exist, but when was the last time you heard of a radical Christian attack?

    -- Posted by Liveforlight on Wed, Jan 21, 2015, at 12:35 PM
  • The point I wanted you to understand is that the majority of Muslims view Islamic terrorists the same way most Christians view the Westboro Babtist Church or the others groups I mentioned. Religious terrorists aren't following the teachings of the Bible, or the Quran. They are both twisting scriptures from both holy books to promote hate, fear, and violence. So, I will ask you the question again and see if you answer it this time...If you can condemn the entire Islam religion because of the terrorist acts of some, should we also condemn Christianity for terrorist acts of some. To debate which religious sect commits more atrocities is futile. Wether it's Timothy McVeigh's ties to the "Christian Identity" group, Pastor Jim Jones' murders and mass suicides, "Army of God" followers firebombing buildings and assassinating doctors, or Muslims extremists flying planes into buildings. What is the difference?

    -- Posted by Rocket Valentine on Wed, Jan 21, 2015, at 8:27 PM
  • What is the difference? That is a fair question. Just because someone CLAIMS they are of a particular belief or uses that as an excuse doesn't mean that is true. The difference is in what each religion teaches. We can debate all types of scriptures from the Bible and Quran and the interpretations thereof but there is a much simpler way to make the comparison.

    The simplest way is to look at the best examples. The ones who represent the perfect Christian and perfect Muslim. By looking at the teachings and actions of these two we can determine whether there is doctrinal justification for the terrorism in each respective religion.

    The perfect Christian was Jesus. The perfect Muslim was Muhammad.

    Christ killed no one and commanded no killing of anyone. Muhammad killed many and commanded the killing of others.

    So those who kill claiming to be Christian are not doing what was taught or commanded by Christ. Those who kill claiming to be Muslim ARE doing what Muhammad taught and commanded. That is the difference.

    I will end my post with quotes from Martin Luther Kings letter from Birmingham that I mentioned above;

    "You speak of our activity in Birmingham as extreme. At first I was rather disappointed that fellow clergymen would see my nonviolent efforts as those of an extremist. I began thinking about the fact that I stand in the middle of two opposing forces in the Negro community. One is a force of complacency, made up in part of Negroes who, as a result of long years of oppression, are so drained of self respect and a sense of "somebodiness" that they have adjusted to segregation; and in part of a few middle-class Negroes who, because of a degree of academic and economic security and because in some ways they profit by segregation, have become insensitive to the problems of the masses. The other force is one of bitterness and hatred, and it comes perilously close to advocating violence. It is expressed in the various black nationalist groups that are springing up across the nation, the largest and best known being Elijah Muhammad's Muslim movement. Nourished by the Negro's frustration over the continued existence of racial discrimination, this movement is made up of people who have lost faith in America, who have absolutely repudiated Christianity, and who have concluded that the white man is an incorrigible "devil."

    Was not Jesus an extremist for love: "Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you." Was not Amos an extremist for justice: "Let justice roll down like waters and righteousness like an ever-flowing stream"...was not Martin Luther an extremist: "Here I stand I can do no other, so help me God."....And Abraham Lincoln: "This nation cannot survive half slave and half free."....So the question is not whether we will be extremists, but what kind of extremists we will be. Will we be extremists for hate or love? Will we be extremists for the preservation of injustice or for the extension of justice?...Perhaps the South, the nation and the world are in dire need of creative extremists."

    ---MLK letter from Birmingham.

    -- Posted by Liveforlight on Thu, Jan 22, 2015, at 6:28 AM
  • You wrote, "Christ killed no one and commanded no killing of anyone". You're joking, right? I really don't think we need to quote and debate scriptures either. But there are literally hundreds of commandments in the bible calling for killing. Killing people for everything from worshipping another God, adultery, disgracing your parents, a woman not being a virgin on her wedding night, working on Sunday instead of going to church, ....I could go on and on and list those scriptures. So your statement about this is completely false. You want to take violent scriptures from one religion literally and condem it, but the ones in the bible you ignore, sidestep, or use some B.S. excuse and say... "Well, that doesn't count." Religious hypocrisy in its finest form.

    -- Posted by Rocket Valentine on Thu, Jan 22, 2015, at 12:05 PM
  • I never said there wasn't killing in the Bible. The old testament has a lot of it, all prior to Christ. There were no Christians in the OT. Even today, some Jews don't believe in Christ. You are mixing religions. I said Jesus is the example and he killed no one. If you are going to cast hateful insults, get your qoutes straight, then inform us whom Jesus killed and who he commanded to kill in his name. Perhaps then your comments will have some validity.

    -- Posted by Liveforlight on Thu, Jan 22, 2015, at 1:14 PM
  • You yourself just validated my comments completely. Thank you.

    -- Posted by Rocket Valentine on Thu, Jan 22, 2015, at 1:24 PM
  • You asked me a question. I answered. I ask you, Who did Jesus kill or command to be killed? Don"t confuse Christianity with Judaism and answer my question.

    -- Posted by Liveforlight on Thu, Jan 22, 2015, at 1:29 PM
  • Again, you are sidestepping. God commanded these things, just as Muhammad did in the Quran. It's the same thing. The only difference is you condemn the Quran, but not the bible.

    -- Posted by Rocket Valentine on Thu, Jan 22, 2015, at 1:49 PM
  • You are the one side stepping the question because you know the answer, and don't want to acknowledge the truth. I follow Christ that is why I am Christian. You want to equate Christianity to Judaism and they are not the same.

    -- Posted by Liveforlight on Thu, Jan 22, 2015, at 2:20 PM
  • I guess your definition of Christianity means to omit the parts of your bible you find inconvenient or violent. Cherry pick out the ones fit your lifestyle. But then take every word literally in Islam's religious holy book, and condemn them for following violent teachings and commandments. Even thou the same things exist in your own holy book. Yeah, I get it.

    -- Posted by Rocket Valentine on Thu, Jan 22, 2015, at 3:11 PM
  • No, my definition of Christianity is be like Christ...doing what he did and taught. My definition of Islam is to be like Muhammad, doing what he did and taught. I thought I made that clear with the comparison above.

    -- Posted by Liveforlight on Thu, Jan 22, 2015, at 3:15 PM
  • Christ didn't negate the OT commands to kill, that's the point. He didn't say TO kill a person for working on Sunday, but he also didn't say to ignore the OT command to do that. Instead he said he was come to change not one jot or tittle of OT commandments, meaning they still stand as commandments from your god.

    Now if you'd like to throw out the OT completely then you have to throw out the fall of Adam and Eve and Original Sin, and without Original Sin, there is no need for Jesus, and now you've erased Christianity.

    -- Posted by ClarkDV on Thu, Jan 22, 2015, at 6:36 PM
  • Exactly Clark, he seems to be saying that the OT, the Ten Commandments, everything in it, is no longer part of his beliefs. But the New Testament states in its verses that the Old Testament is still binding and it's laws do apply. It's just a way of trying to B.S. his way out of the inconvenient bible verses that show violence and command killing. That way he can condemn other religions that do the same.

    -- Posted by Rocket Valentine on Thu, Jan 22, 2015, at 7:57 PM
  • This is what Christ said:

    Matt 5"Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. 18For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished."

    Notice he said he came to fulfill the law,,and fulfill it he did.

    John: 28Later, knowing that everything had now been finished, and so that Scripture would be fulfilled, Jesus said, "I am thirsty." 29A jar of wine vinegar was there, so they soaked a sponge in it, put the sponge on a stalk of the hyssop plant, and lifted it to Jesus' lips. 30When he had received the drink, Jesus said, "It is finished." With that, he bowed his head and gave up his spirit.

    I do not throw out the OT completely. Jesus completed all of the requirements of the old testament law. Therefore a Christian is no longer bound by the law. I am bound only to the teachings of Jesus, such as; Love God above all and love my neighbor as myself. The historical records, as found in the OT, along with the recorded events are still valuable to Christians.

    Judaism, which does not believe Jesus as messiah, still practices OT law. This is not required for Christians.

    In many aspects, obeying Christ is much harder as he commands us:

    27"But to you who are listening I say: Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, 28bless those who curse you, pray for those who mistreat you. 29If someone slaps you on one cheek, turn to them the other also. If someone takes your coat, do not withhold your shirt from them. 30Give to everyone who asks you, and if anyone takes what belongs to you, do not demand it back. 31Do to others as you would have them do to you.

    32"If you love those who love you, what credit is that to you? Even sinners love those who love them. 33And if you do good to those who are good to you, what credit is that to you? Even sinners do that. 34And if you lend to those from whom you expect repayment, what credit is that to you? Even sinners lend to sinners, expecting to be repaid in full. 35But love your enemies, do good to them, and lend to them without expecting to get anything back. Then your reward will be great, and you will be children of the Most High, because he is kind to the ungrateful and wicked. 36Be merciful, just as your Father is merciful.

    Moving our arguments to another topic doesn't really change our wasting time does it ClarkDV?

    I see there no other Christians on here, or they are not willing to stand. At any rate, I am tired of the strife and wasted effort. It would seem that everyone who posts on here has already made up their minds anyway. So, if you don't believe in God that is fine by me. But perhaps you can see the value of Jesus and his teachings if you can overcome your desire to condemn him.

    Good luck:)

    -- Posted by Liveforlight on Thu, Jan 22, 2015, at 8:00 PM
  • Liveforlight,

    Unless the Holy spirit intervenes and calls out to a fence post your efforts are forever to be fruitless.

    Nothing short of the Holy Spirit can crack a heart of rock.

    You have a good hammer but....

    -- Posted by Blessed Assurance on Thu, Jan 22, 2015, at 8:30 PM
  • BA,

    Anyone should be able to see the differences between the teachings of Jesus and the teaching of Mohammad, whether they believe in God or not. Both men's teachings are written and available. If positive or negative value is assigned to either, then a choice has to be made and action will follow.

    It seems the desire is to condemn all religion. So, all are then deemed as equal, thereby making it easier to reach a consensus and justify the condemnation. Throwing the baby out with the bathwater so to speak. This is the desire of the enemy of man.

    Unfortunately hard hearts are usually crushed to pieces. The pulling down of strongholds can result in total ruin. Let us pray it does not come to that.

    -- Posted by Liveforlight on Thu, Jan 22, 2015, at 9:01 PM
  • " It would seem that everyone who posts on here has already made up their minds anyway."

    Including you, Liv, including you. But then, YOU are right, and don't need to rethink anything, do you?

    LOL

    OT commandments stand, whether you think so or not. It says so right in your bible. No "interpretation" needed.

    Wasting time? Nah, someone needs to be vigilant against the hogwash you spread.

    -- Posted by ClarkDV on Fri, Jan 23, 2015, at 3:55 AM
  • Anyone should be able to see the differences between the teachings of Jesus and the teaching of Mohammad, whether they believe in God or not.

    Posted by Liveforlight

    Yes they should. It is as easy to discern as day and night. Likewise is Judaism.

    I just sometimes think you would be about as well off pulling up a chair and striking up a conversation with a fencepost.

    -- Posted by Blessed Assurance on Fri, Jan 23, 2015, at 8:14 PM
  • Liveforlight,

    To further clarify I am sometimes reminded of Mathew.

    13 But he answered and said, Every plant, which my heavenly Father hath not planted, shall be rooted up.

    14 Let them alone: they be blind leaders of the blind. And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch.

    -- Posted by Blessed Assurance on Fri, Jan 23, 2015, at 8:31 PM
  • Ah yes...Matthew. But I think a better verse for Liveforlight to study up on would be Matthew 7:1-2 Judge not, that ye be not judged.

    2 For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.

    -- Posted by Rocket Valentine on Fri, Jan 23, 2015, at 9:13 PM
  • Now that is beautiful! People posting the words of Jesus, just when I thought this was all fruitless.

    -- Posted by Liveforlight on Fri, Jan 23, 2015, at 10:36 PM
  • Matt 7:15"Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves. 16By their fruit you will recognize them. Do people pick grapes from thornbushes, or figs from thistles? 17Likewise, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. 18A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit. 19Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. 20Thus, by their fruit you will recognize them.

    -- Posted by Liveforlight on Fri, Jan 23, 2015, at 11:19 PM
  • A tree rooted in the Holy Spirit with sap flowing up to it branches and out to the buds will most definitely produce fruit that is recognizable.

    And the fruits of the Spirit are....

    -- Posted by Blessed Assurance on Sat, Jan 24, 2015, at 6:14 AM
  • Those who believe and do good deeds -- the Gracious God will create love in their hearts. (Al Quran 19:97)

    -- Posted by Rocket Valentine on Sat, Jan 24, 2015, at 7:08 AM
  • Gal 5:22 But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, forbearance, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, 23 gentleness and self-control. Against such things there is no law.

    Luke 6:27"But to you who are listening I say: Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, 28bless those who curse you, pray for those who mistreat you. 29If someone slaps you on one cheek, turn to them the other also. If someone takes your coat, do not withhold your shirt from them. 30Give to everyone who asks you, and if anyone takes what belongs to you, do not demand it back. 31Do to others as you would have them do to you.

    -- Posted by Liveforlight on Sat, Jan 24, 2015, at 1:41 PM
  • The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) said: "Religion is very easy, and whoever overburdens himself in his religion will not be able to continue in that way. So you should not be extremists, but try to be near to perfection and receive the good tidings that you will be rewarded." "Forgive him who wrongs you; join him who cuts you off; do good to him who does evil to you; and speak the truth although it be against yourself." Notice how when you read these Bible and Quran scriptures they sound so similar?

    -- Posted by Rocket Valentine on Sun, Jan 25, 2015, at 9:04 AM
  • I noticed how you didn't post the scripture you claim Muhammad said.

    I also notice that the one you posted about those who believe and do good is the chapter (Quran 19) that describes the birth of Jesus some 600 yrs. later.

    All of the Quran comes Muhammad. He was peaceful at first and became more militant as he grew older. Jesus was never militant and always peaceful. Jesus warned us; Matt 7:15"Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves.

    Since Muhammad was 600 yrs after Jesus, of course he would use some of the same teachings. But his intentions were to devour the whole world with the use of Jihad.

    All Islamic scripture came through Muhammad. Here are some more of his words.

    Fight the non-believers, Allah will humiliate them and give you victory. 9:14

    9:29

    Fight those who do not profess the true faith (Islam) till they pay the jiziya (poll tax) with the hand of humility.

    This is war/violence on every non-muslim until they submit.

    Now, can you show me where Jesus said anything similar?

    Check this link for some comparisons concerning violence, this even reaches into old testament.

    http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Quran/023-violence.htm

    -- Posted by Liveforlight on Sun, Jan 25, 2015, at 4:51 PM
  • Liveforlight,

    Very informative link. You have illustrated the stark opposites of the two. Literally as much difference as day and night and peace and war.

    Jesus told Peter to put up the sword.

    Muhammad commands to get out the sword.

    Jesus' first word to the disciples even after his being crucified were "Peace".

    Muhammad commands "War".

    -- Posted by Blessed Assurance on Mon, Jan 26, 2015, at 9:00 AM
  • All of you believers, worldwide, are just little kids on a playground, each arguing that their superhero is the best.

    "Superman could kick Batman's butt!"

    "Nuh-uh, Spider-Man is stronger than both of them!"

    "You take that back!"

    POW!

    PUNCH*$!

    BANG#@)

    And on and on and on and on...

    Could you kids please keep it down? The grownups are trying to get some work done.

    -- Posted by ClarkDV on Mon, Jan 26, 2015, at 4:19 PM
  • Is ClarkDV tired of playing on the playground all alone by his lonesome?

    -- Posted by Blessed Assurance on Mon, Jan 26, 2015, at 9:16 PM
  • BA, don't you have a letter to Santa to write? Sharpen your crayons!

    -- Posted by ClarkDV on Tue, Jan 27, 2015, at 1:08 PM
  • Well, I guess this post has run its course. Thanks folks for contributing so much.

    -- Posted by stevemills on Tue, Jan 27, 2015, at 2:01 PM
  • ClarkDV,

    I was hoping to borrow a red and green from you.

    Just joking. Good luck with your unbelief. It seems to work well for you.

    -- Posted by Blessed Assurance on Tue, Jan 27, 2015, at 2:18 PM
  • DVClark and Rocket Valentine

    I pray that you both will come to Christ and be forgiven, but either way the OT was nailed to the cross with Jesus. The commandments we are to follow were brought forth to the NT. Please study the Bible and understand it instead of pulling what you want from it.

    May God Bless you both and touch your hearts.

    -- Posted by Wolf Clan on Thu, Jan 29, 2015, at 12:45 AM
  • Amen!

    -- Posted by Blessed Assurance on Thu, Jan 29, 2015, at 7:19 AM
  • Wolfclan, thank you for your prayers, even thou I feel more sarcasm from you than sincerity. I'm not sure what you think I need forgiving, or how do you know I haven't been already. The main reason I don't attend any church is having to encounter the common holier than thou attitudes from people like the ones who post on here. Judgmental, hypocritical, bible thumpers with so much hate for others that don't think exactly as they do. If you really feel the need to pray for someone, pray for yourselves.

    -- Posted by Rocket Valentine on Thu, Jan 29, 2015, at 7:45 PM
  • Rocket, I am sorry you think I am sarcastic. I am completely serious. I don't hate, either. I pray for all non believers and believers and myself. Thank you for the reply. I have had my say, I won't bother you anymore.

    -- Posted by Wolf Clan on Thu, Jan 29, 2015, at 10:05 PM
  • It is sometimes hard to convey the real meaning in words alone

    -- Posted by stevemills on Fri, Jan 30, 2015, at 7:01 AM
  • Typed print is often misunderstood. Actually totally misunderstood quite often. Hard to see the heart in black typed letters on white paper.

    -- Posted by Blessed Assurance on Fri, Jan 30, 2015, at 7:26 AM
Respond to this blog

Posting a comment requires free registration: