Bedford Ramblings
Steve Mills

Benghazi. Here we go.

Posted Friday, October 23, 2015, at 1:40 PM
View 66 comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. Please note that those who post comments on this website may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.
  • *


    Your link didn't work, however I was aware of it but decided not to confuse the people since that Amendment was replaced unconstitutionally.

    Amendment XIII

    Passed by Congress May 1, 1810 - Ratified December 9, 1812.

    If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince, or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the united States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them."

    (This Amendment was for the specific purpose of banning participate in government operations by attorneys and bankers who claimed the Title of Nobility of "Esquire." These people had joined the International Bar Association or the International Bankers Association and owed their allegiance to the King of England. Banning Titles of Nobility began in the Articles of Confederation, continued in two places in the Constitution, and finally was added as an Amendment to the Constitution -- an Amendment that had teeth in it to punish those persons who chose to ignore the Constitutional Law.)

    The Lawyer's Guild had the original 13th Amendment removed from the U.S.Constitution and replaced with the current 13th Amendment. That is all I am going to say about this as it goes much deeper than this. Search: 1950 81st Congress Investigated the Lawyers Guild...?

    -- Posted by sui on Fri, Oct 23, 2015, at 5:08 PM
  • *

    Rocket Valentine;

    Why would the Republicans want to have a hearing on them? The Brain Dead Democrats where satisfied with it or they would have said it was RACIST!

    -- Posted by sui on Fri, Oct 23, 2015, at 5:11 PM
  • *

    lets be real;

    If you weren't Brain Dead and could read, you would have read in my comment above the long list of questions that I said the Republicans could and should have asked Hillary Clinton!

    I don't need Hillary Clinton to tell me what happened in Benghazi that night. I already know what happened and have been telling people in several of my comments on several blogs here on T-G.

    Obama, Hillary Clinton and Now Joe Biden all knew there was a terror attack on the Benghazi Embassy that night and lied about it because the CIA in Libya (just down the road from the Embassy) was removing weapons from Libya and sending them to Syria and decided they could NOT send Troops to Benghazi because that would mess up the gun smuggling covert action.

    The CIA Agents were all out taking arms to the ship to be taken to Syria to stop and go help Ambassador Stephens and the Embassy Guards.

    The thing is, I was hoping they would take it all the way to the top and burn Obama with Hillary because he was in on it also. They had here own little covert action going on the get the weapons out of Libya after Obama took Muammar Gaddafi out of office and send the weapons to Syria.

    Then they had a problem, Benghazi was under attack and they felt the arms control was more important than 4 lives in Benghazi.

    Then Joe Biden comes in alive with his little speech about not running for President but he has attended EVERY one of Obama's Meetings.

    That means Joe Biden is just as evil as Obama and Hillary Clinton by going right along with Obama and Hillary in their Lies about the attack on Benghazi.

    Hillary Clinton had 11 Investigations to come out with the TRUTH but refused to tell the TRUTH until her emails surfaced. Now when she Lies, they can call her on it, even though they didn't go as far with it as they should have. (See my Questions in my comment above)

    Now for the Brain Dead; These investigations where to inform the people what kind of lying person Hillary Clinton is before you vote her into the highest Office of the U.S. States.

    She didn't do her job as the Secretary of State with integrity, honor, pride and trustworthy. She swore Ambassador in then never called him or took any of his calls after that. Not even the 600 emails and calls for military help. (I miss quoted the 60 email for help when there were actually 600 emails asking for help.

    She is not the kind of person I want as my President. What do you think would have happened if all the Democrats were visiting Benghazi that night? That would have been the last of our problems for sure.

    The reason you didn't hear any hearing for all those other embassy attacks is because the Democrats couldn't think of any questions to ask about them!

    I think Gowdy was wanting to show everything he had on Blumenthal but the Democrats stopped him short. It was taking too long.

    Look at the TRUTH, lets be real, Obama not only took the troops out of Iraq but gave the Iraqis WEAPONS of MASS DESTRUCTION just to have them give the weapons to Isis.

    At least President Bush didn't give them WEAPONS of MASS DESTRUCTION!

    Look at what Obama did in Egypt! Obama took the leader out of office a let the Muslim Brotherhood have the country. Then Obama gave these Islamist Terrorist Muslims WEAPONS of MASS DESTRUCTION in the form or Fighter Aircraft and Tanks.

    In Libya Obama took out Muammar Gaddafi and removed the weapons and sent them to Syria just to have he blown up by Russia along with Obama's Allies the Rebels.

    What part of Stupid don't you understand?

    -- Posted by sui on Fri, Oct 23, 2015, at 6:00 PM
  • Sorry sui, the link on the other blog works. Steve must have missed part of it when he copied and pasted it. Here it is again,


    Had this amendment not been removed, then the current 13th amendment would now be the fourteenth. The others would all be incremented by one as well. Assuming, of course, they were passed we would now have 28. It is evidence of how long the perversion of "The Law" has been going on.

    My search from your suggestion lead to the National Lawyers Guild. I would encourage everyone to learn about this group.

    Khrushchev was right, thanks to those who perpetuate "False philanthropy and stupid greed".

    -- Posted by Liveforlight on Fri, Oct 23, 2015, at 7:13 PM
  • *

    fair share;

    The Democrats are behind Obama 100%. Obama's new decision is to veto any offer to raise the debt ceiling if there is any thing demanding a spending cut!

    What American doesn't understand how that works? If you want to spend more money, you have to cut or stop spending somewhere. Just Proves Obama is not an American. He just doesn't know how this Country operates!

    The Democrats want the Republicans to stop spending Taxpayer money so Obama can get it all.

    L@@K what the Republicans spent on the investigations to do what Hillary wanted, "With all due respect, the fact is we had 4 dead Americans. Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided they'd go kill some Americans? What difference at this point does it make? It is our job to figure out what happened and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening ..."!

    Hillary wanted the Republicans to find out what happened and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again. So it cost 4.5 Million Dollars so far (according to Democrats). What difference at this time does it make?

    Obama spent 500 Million Dollars training and arming the Syrian Rebels just so Obama could just sit and watch Putin Bomb the hell out of them and their arms. Obama done nothing except send that useless Secretary of State, Kerry, to ask Putin not to shoot down our planes.

    Let's see if I have that right!

    $4.5 Million to find out why Obama, Hillary and Joe Biden Lied to the American people at the cost of 4 American Lives worth way more than 4.5 Million dollars each -

    against -

    the $500,000,000 that Obama spent training and Arming Syrian Rebels who joined Isis and the rest he got to watch get Bombed by Putin.

    $4.5 Million to $500 Million. Which one actually paid off the best.

    -- Posted by sui on Fri, Oct 23, 2015, at 7:39 PM
  • *

    Just for Liveforlight;

    December 9th 1945 International Organization Immunities Act relinquished every public office of the United States to the United Nations.

    22 CFR 92.12-92.31 FR Heading "Foreign Relationship" states that an oath is required to take office.

    Title 8 USC 1481 stated once an oath of office is taken citizenship is relinquished, thus you become a foreign entity, agency, or state. That means every public office is a foreign state, including all political subdivisions. (i.e. every single court and that courts personnel is considered a separate foreign entity)

    Title 22 USC (Foreign Relations and Intercourse) Chapter 11 identifies all public officials as foreign agents.

    Title 28 USC 3002 Section 15A states that the United States is a Federal Corporation and not a Government, including the Judiciary Procedural Section.

    Basically, Every government employee who has to take an oath to hold a job is no long a U.S. Citizen but a foreign agent working for a foreign agency.

    -- Posted by sui on Fri, Oct 23, 2015, at 8:14 PM
  • *


    what ever happened to Carl McClanahan and his Politically Incorrect blogs? I missed most of his blogs and they are right down my alley.

    -- Posted by sui on Fri, Oct 23, 2015, at 8:23 PM
  • Sui, I don't know where your getting that information, but it's wrong.

    For an easy one, the oath relinquishing citizenship only applies if that oath is an oath of allegiance to a foreign country.


    -- Posted by quietmike on Sat, Oct 24, 2015, at 12:57 AM
  • *


    You are right about the dems being behind b o 100%. They probably think his farts smell like Fabreeze. I think every single dem at the hearing complained long and loud about the few million it was costing but I don't recall any of them saying a word about the 500mil.

    Speaking of b o and the military, I guess he sees that his time is winding down and he hasn't destroyed them yet. That must be why he vetoed the military spending bill--just stop paying them and maybe they will quit and go home.

    -- Posted by fair share on Sat, Oct 24, 2015, at 1:06 AM
  • Sui, I do not know where MOST of the other bloggers are. I will try to find out.

    Most of us are getting up in age and I know a few who have age related health issues. I can relate, but try to throw up some subjects I know folks like to discuss.

    I am out of my comfort zone here, but.....

    -- Posted by stevemills on Sat, Oct 24, 2015, at 8:00 AM
  • quietmike said, "Sui, I don't know where your getting that information, but it's wrong."

    That statement is true for every crazy rant that Sui has ever posted on these blogs.

    There is a large faction of the republican party that has gone completely off the deep end.

    Created by far right wing propaganda, they believe all the lies and conspiracy theories that they've been fed.

    They truly believe President Obama is the anti-Christ (there's actually a documentary style video on this, Google it), and he's a America hating, radical muslim, born in Kenya.

    They've created this monster, these crazed, paranoid, tea party nuts. And now they don't know what to do with them.

    Republicans never wanted Donald Trump to be their nominee, still don't. And they will still try everything they can to stop it.

    But guys like Sui, this is their base now. It's all come back to bite them right in the a$$.

    The latest Benghazi hearings were nothing more than political theater. A political witch-hunt designed to derail a presidential campaign. But it backfired.

    A huge waste time and millions of taxpayer dollars. And again, and again, each of these hearings and committees have found no wrongdoing by Hilliary Clinton or the Obama administration.

    No "stand down orders", no lack of security, no "cover up", no scandel.

    Since one of Sui's favorite Benghazi conspiracy theories revolves around gun running, let's review what the republican led House Intellegence Committee said in their report.

    -- Posted by Rocket Valentine on Sat, Oct 24, 2015, at 9:35 AM
  • Here's that report

    Finding #4: The CIA was not collecting and shipping arms from Libya to Syria.

    Multiple media outlets have reported allegations about the CIA collecting weapons in Benghazi and facilitating weapons from Libya to Syria. The eyewitness testimony and thousands of pages of CIA cables and emails that the committee reviewed provide no support for this allegation.

    Committee members and staff asked all witnesses what they observed at the Benghazi Annex and weather they had any information to support allegations about weapons being collected and transported to Syria. Each witness reported seeing only standard CIA security weapons at the base.

    No witness testified that non-CIA weapons were brought to the Annex.

    Security personnel and officers testified that they had complete access to the Annex and would have observed any weapons, such as MANPADs, stored at the facility.

    Security personal and officers also testified that nobody told them to hide or withhold any information from the committee.

    This record is consistent throughout the committee interviews by members and staff.

    According to testimony from CIA Deputy Director Morell and confirmed by other witnesses, the CIA's mission in Benghazi was to collect foreign intelligence. From the Annex in Benghazi, the CIA was collecting intelligence about foreign entities that were themselves collecting weapons in Libya and facilitating their passage to Syria. The Benghazi Annex itself was not collecting weapons. The Committee has not seen any credible evidence to disbute these facts.

    -- Posted by Rocket Valentine on Sat, Oct 24, 2015, at 10:45 AM
  • Republicans don't even want to believe their own report from the House Intellgence Comm,thats how bad they want to stop Hillary.Sui why did Obama have to send WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION to Irag when Bush stated they were already there?A whole lot of Sui's information is wrong. We must not have seen the same hearing Thursday,I saw and heard Cummings say to Gowdy "lets release all the Blumental emails" and Gowdy refused. The republicans are stuck with Trump with no way out.If they don't play with him he will retaliate.Now the cry baby is saying the Quinnipiac and Bloomberg polls are wrong and don't like him.Last month when he was ahead he stated they were "great polling companys,real deal, big and respected".He bragged about these polls at every event.He is still trying to remove journalist from his meeting when they ask questions he doesn't like.We don't need a play ground bully in the White House.If he talks to leaders of other countries and call them names like he does to americans who say something he doesn't like we will be at war with every country.

    -- Posted by lets be real on Sat, Oct 24, 2015, at 11:27 AM
  • Sui you said we didn't have hearings on other Embassy attacks because Democratics didn't know what questions to ask,what about the republicans.

    -- Posted by lets be real on Sat, Oct 24, 2015, at 11:38 AM
  • *


    Can you not read?

    I posted in that last comment to Livforlight the following:

    December 9th 1945 International Organization Immunities Act relinquished every public office of the United States to the United Nations.

    (This was a condition of the U.S. Bankruptcy)

    Title 22 USC (Foreign Relations and Intercourse) Chapter 11 identifies all public officials as foreign agents.

    (If all public officials are foreign agents, then they are working for a foreign agency!)

    Title 28 USC 3002 Section 15A states that the United States is a Federal Corporation and not a Government, including the Judiciary Procedural Section.

    (Since the United States IS a Federal Corporation - it is a Foreign Corporation in respect to the 50 states or a Foreign Agency!)

    UCC 9-307 (h) (the Uniform Commercial Code)

    (h) [Location of United States.]

    The United States is located in the District of Columbia.

    (The United States is not the 50 states. The United States is a Corporation located in Washington, DC and is a Federal Territory not a state although it is referred to as a (S)tate to represent all the Federal Terrotories.)

    The (S)tate, Washington, DC, as defined in Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 of the U.S. Constitution, and all the Federal Territories are Foreign Territories (now Foreign Agencies) to these united States

    Look them up for yourself!

    These ARE United States Codes! USC's ARE the Law of the land. They are Article III Court Dejure laws, not the color of law.

    So we see now that an oath for US government jobs and State government jobs is an oath of allegiance to a foreign country.

    (Note: the congress created Federal States inside each of the soverign states so it would have exclusive jurisdiction over 14th amendment citizens, and it could include the Federal States as a co-signer to the bankruptcy of the Federal Corporation.)

    This has been misinterpreted to mean everyone (taxpayers) would have to help pay the debt. This is FALSE! The people are not citizens of the State and not bound by Federal Legislation. Therefore we the people do not owe the debt. The State is the co-signer, not the people.

    The US is Bankrupt but not the people. The government gets it's money from the Taxpayers. If the People were bankrupt, what money would the government be getting from the people?

    I know it is very complicated, but maybe you can follow it better now?

    Now if all the government agencies have been given to the United Nations (1945), which is a Foreign Agency, then all government agencies are Foreign Agencies! So if anyone takes an oath to be an employee of one of these Foreign Agencies - well as you quoted - they lose their natural citizenship and become Foreign Agents.

    If that ever becomes a problem for anyone, they can always rescind their signature on all government Documents and become a Sovereign man or woman. Of course that would mean not valid licenses or marriage license etc., etc..

    Oh the web the U.S. and the ABA has woven!

    -- Posted by sui on Sat, Oct 24, 2015, at 12:19 PM
  • *


    I have to admit, you do step out of your comfort zone, but you do a great service in keeping people commenting on your blogs. I try to keep it clean but....

    Thanks for all you do for the bloggers!

    -- Posted by sui on Sat, Oct 24, 2015, at 12:23 PM
  • *

    Rocket Valentine;

    Prove my crazy rant wrong RV! You want to accuse without any proof. I provide proof for just about everything I state.

    I have never said Obama was the anti-Christ. Obama isn't smart enough to be the anti-Christ! I saud the government was anti-Christ because they do everything they can to stop Christanity in America but not the Atheist, not Radical Muslim Religions.

    And now the schools are going anti-Christ for the same reasons. Obama is behind this movement.

    The large faction of the republican party that has gone completely off the deep end is the Congressmen. They propose something then can't follow through with it. They don't listen to the people and should be replaced until they do.

    I have not seen one Republican that I would vote for except Trump! The rest of them are just talkers and have no idea what running the country consists of. They all think taxes is the answer just like Obama thinks spending is the answer.

    The republicans are starting to go for Trump and so are a lot of democrats. Ouch, that hurt!

    The latest Benghazi Hearing WAS nothing more than a political theater.A political witch-hunt to derail the Republican Presidential Campaign. The Republicans were not smart enough to ask the right questions.

    No stand down orders? You should have watched Hannity last night RV. He had the CIA Contractors who went to Benghazi against the "Stand-Down" Orders. They were told to stand down two or three times and they know because they were the ones who were told to stand down. That getting the information stright from the source. No question left in my mind. about the "stand down order". Even thou Your favorite woman said in her testimony that there was no stand down order. There was and the men who were ordered to stand down admitted it last night.

    Hillary Clinton wasn't there and She admitted she had not heard from Bbenghazi nor had she emailed nor spoke to Ambassador Stephens since she swore him in. She testified that she didn't know anything about Benghazi being attacked until 4:00 am that morning in the white house.

    If Hillary didn't know anything about the attack on Benghazi why was she at the White House at 4:00 am. Was there a party going on at 4:00 am.?

    The fact that Hillary never saw the 600 emails from Benghazi proves to me she wasn't doing her job that she got paid very good to do. That is Fraud when you except money to do a job and do not do your job. She said her job was not to provide mailitary backup or provide for their safety.

    Tell me, what was her job that she got paid so much money to do.

    If it wasn't Hillary's job to provide protection to our Embassy employees, then it must have been PRESIDENT OBAMA'S JOB! Neither did their job yet got paid well to do it.

    Obama didn't have any trouble supplying planes to bomb Egypt and Libya to the United Nations without the consent of congress, but couldn't send help for Ambassador Stephens who was begging for help all day long.

    Obama didn't have a trouble sending Planes and Tanks to the Muslim Brotherhood after they took over Egypt. (Weapons of Mass Destruction)

    Obama didn't have any trouble sending our military weapons and equipment to Iraqi soldiers who handed them over to Isis. (Weapons of Mass Destruction)

    Obama didn't have any trouble leaving a Top Secret Tail Section behind on the raid to get Bin Laden which was handed over to China. We had drones in the area that could have destroyed the tail section.

    Obama didn't have any trouble sending weapons of Mass Destruction to the Syrian Rebels and $500 Million in training them, just to let us watch Putin bomb them and the weapons.

    Plus the 45 Trained personnel who took their training and weapons and joined Isis.

    What was so hard about sending a few good men to the embassy before night fall on 9-11, the anniversary of 9-11?

    -- Posted by sui on Sat, Oct 24, 2015, at 1:09 PM
  • Thank you sui. I don't get too talkative but I do stay involved so I can keep a finger on the pulse.

    -- Posted by stevemills on Sat, Oct 24, 2015, at 1:19 PM
  • *

    Rocket Valentine;

    If what you say about the Republicans is true, why would you take a report on hearsay that the republicans put out?

    Why didn't the democrats put out a report for your reading pleasure? YOU can't believe what the republicans say.

    Ambassador Stephens was put in the Benghazi embassy (which now Hillary is saying we didn't even have an embassy in Benghazi it was something else, not even a compound, but a consulate) and Stephens job was to gather information for the U.S.

    I do not know what information she got from Ambassador Stephens since she never received one email or phone call from Ambassador Stephens after she swore him in.

    Rep Gowdy proved she got emails from a Blumenthal and emailed him back telling him to keep sending the emails to her, but never one from Stephens.

    I find that hard to believe! I would have thought she would have asked him what he was doing if he wasn't sending information. That was his sole job there, to gather information.

    Remember back then, there were questions as to Benghazi being a holding and torturing building for prisoners. That report was denied and put to rest. There was even talk that it might have been those rumors that started the attack.

    THAT is why the report said there was no weapons or arms at the Benghazi embassy. I never said that Ambassador Stephens or the CIA was collecting weapons or storing them at the Benghazi Embassy.

    The CIA wasn't even at the Benghazi embassy. They had their own annex about a mile or so away. They were in charge of collecting and inspecting the weapons and overseeing that they were shipped to Syria and not returned into North Africa to the Terrorists.

    All those government findings are all cleaned up to protect what the government was really doing.

    If you want to truth, you have to go to the source. The men who were there during the operation and fighting.

    The witnesses who were there said the reports were all bullsh__ to make the government look good. They reported lies instead of the truth.

    The CIA knew where each weapon came from and what it was used for and logged documented before they were sent to Syria.

    -- Posted by sui on Sat, Oct 24, 2015, at 1:58 PM
  • Steve, I note my name being mentioned and also note your inference some are getting older and have health issues. While I will readily admit to being probably the oldest blogger here, I have no health issues and any who know me personally will readily attest I display no diminished reasoning nor intellectual capacities.

    I have stated in a comment to my last blog, I will no longer provide a forum for cowardly left-wing bloviaters who do not have the courage to place their identification on their comments.

    This is a quality you and I do not have. These folk obviously have not the ability to originate a rational position and intelligently defend such position. They feel endowed by whom I don't know, to take the thoughts and feelings of others and cowardly, anonymously denigrate the authors positions.

    I choose to debate the great issues of the day with more honest intelligent people. I'm a little surprised you seem compelled to give the people a voice even while implying the subject matter is outside your area of interest and expertise.

    -- Posted by cmcclanahan on Sat, Oct 24, 2015, at 2:03 PM
  • And Sui you will never find the truth from Faux talk show pretend news.It not the first time they paraded phony people on their show.I will further investigate to see if these people were even there.Shawn Republican Hannity is a extreme right wing liar. So that is where you are getting all your wrong information.This is the station that refused to believe Obama won the 2nd term.

    -- Posted by lets be real on Sat, Oct 24, 2015, at 2:31 PM
  • *

    lets be real;

    I watched the last investigation and heard things with my own ears that most Democrats didn't hear evidently.

    I do not believe everything I read in reports. I read between the lines and come to my own conclusions because that is all that matters to me. What you believe doesn't concern me unless it is forced on me.

    That is what I have been trying to tell you Democrats. Obama is Brain Dead and shouldn't be running our Country. Why would anyone want to bring weapons of mass destruction into Iraq? The Iraqis give all the weapons away to someone else.

    Think about it. Bush came up with Weapons of mass destruction because that is what his intelligent advisers told him.

    However, Bush waited months before going in and looking for them. Iraq had gas canisters and chemical weapons that were used on the northern communities.

    Didn't Obama say that Syria had used Gas on his own people? Where do you think Assad got those Gas canisters? Iraq had to get rid of all their weapons of mass destruction before Bush sent in the troops months later.

    Saddam Hussein was torturing his own people in torture chambers with acid and other techniques. He would kill anyone who looked like he couldn't trust them. His sons were raping and murdering women and they found signs of mass graves.

    I understood we were going in because of humanitarian reasons to save the Iraqi people from Hussein. Bush kept looking for weapons of mass destruction to save face from his claim.

    None were found thou until Obama brought all the troops home from Iraq and we left our weapons of mass destruction there for the Iraqi army.

    The Iraqis gave those weapons of mass destruction away to their new enemies Isis.

    If Iraq had weapons of Mass destruction, why did Obama leave them there for the Iraqis if we couldn't trust them with weapons of mass destruction? Dumb move for a President of the U.S..

    A lot of my information is wrong like; 1.) Blumenthals emails were not that important because they were nothing more than conspiracy theories. 2.) Gowdy only had so much time to talk so why would he use it up on useless emails. 3.) Gowdy used Blumenthals emails to make a couple good points which no Democrat could understand.

    Trump is still top man in my book no matter what the republicans or democrats say.

    You have to think like the Government;

    First this Country is a Corporation and not a Government. I have provided all the proof I intend to for this statement. You can find it in my other comments.

    Second the Law used on us IS The Uniform Commercial Code. A Law on Contracts. Yes even when you are written up for running a stop sign, you are tried accord to a Uniform Commercial Code. The Color of a Law or made-up-law. It is actually a Federal Code and applicable to Government employees and 14th amendment citizens because they are lacking Due Process.

    Third, Sanctions are nothing more than legal CONTRACTS!

    Obamacare is a Contract. Did you sign a contract with Obama for his Obamacare Insurance plan?

    Treaties are International Contracts but none the same they are Binding Contracts.

    Now lets see who we should put in the White House to Make Contracts with other countries and Bind them to our conditions?

    Hillary is a Known Liar and deceiver! She doesn't know anything when asked to answer questions and thinks you can delete information on a server by wiping it with a cloth.

    You have 3 other Democrats who have already conceded to Hillary, not counting Biden who conceded to Hillary too, so they are out of the race also.

    We have the Republicans who can't seem to get out of the single digit level. There is Ben Carson a favorite for many republicans but a Doctor who knows nothing about Contracts and the One World Law.

    So it looks to me like it will be between Hillary and Trump. A Liar and a Business expert!

    Who should be elected to run our country built on Contracts. Even the U.S. Constitution is a Contract with the Government which Bush said was just a ?@!%* piece of paper.

    The Constitution is a ?@!%* piece of paper that binds the government to the terms and conditions written in the U.S. Constitution. That is why the Government doesn't like the Constitution and wants to get their hands on it to change everything so the government would have control over the people which it does have as long as we don't amend the Constitution.

    Well lets see, Hillary wants a bigger government so the Black Lives Matter Group can provide more moving targets for their members to shoot at and kill. She want more undocumented Aliens in our country killing our Daughters and sons and not be prosecuted for it and still get to come back into our country to kill again.

    Hillary wants more money to spend like Obama had during his two terms. Now that the debt keeps going up by the Trillions, I imagine Hillary will be spending much more than Obama did. Although Obama sent most of that money to his Islamist friends and Countries.

    What about Trump? Someone who knows nothing about Big Business and Corporations nor buying and selling nor getting problems taken care of quickly nor business contracts. Someone who has no experience in contracting with Foreign Countries nor educated in knowing how to demand what he wants without firing a shot.

    A man who doesn't know how to make money nor put it to good use nor how to compound the profits. A man who doesn't know how to talk to foreign people and demand anything from them.

    Wow! I just don't know who to vote for as the most logical choice of running this country!!!!!

    -- Posted by sui on Sat, Oct 24, 2015, at 3:28 PM
  • *


    I am the one who asked Steve about your blogs. I found them very interesting but I came on too late to get in on them.

    I know things that no man should be allowed to know, but I try to back everything up with proof but not with my personal identity. There are too many Quackos in this world to invite someone into your life by giving out your ID. No one really knows me anyway so my ID would be useless.

    I can see your point, but also most of us wish to remain unknown. Some of the things I say are over most peoples head. If they can't accept the truth they are brain dead in my opinion.

    I also like to shock the readers into answering the comments I make. Too many of the bloggers are here just to read and not participate themselves.

    Steve was just giving me an explanation of what may have happened to some of the bloggers. I know for a fact that one day I may be here and the next I no longer exist and that goes for everyone.

    I know what you mean about the left wingers. I have dealt with a lot of them but it is just a lack of Common Sense. They just won't stop and think for themselves. They listen to their msnbc news that explains to them everything they need to say to answer questions.

    However, a lot of people have to google to answer a question. The internet will give you answers for either side you want to believe. So I think sometimes it helps to let people say what they BELIEVE regardless of what it is. Sometimes a meeting of the minds will come together.

    I was told as a kid, you never want to talk about Politics or Religion. I have voiced my opinion on both and I understand what my elders were saying now.

    I read a lot of the law and Constitution laws on your blog and found that some answers were incomplete. For the record, not everything you read in the law applies to everyone. Congress was given the power to legislate for 2 classes of people. The Sovereign People and the 14th Amendment Citizens so... we have two different laws that can be applied to us; Common Law, (Dejure Law) which is the supreme law of the land and the Uniform Commercial Code or Statutory Law (color of Law) which is unjust, unlawful and unconstitutional.

    That is what I know and how I think and comment. If you would like some answers to your Constitutional or Law Blogs I would love to get in on them. I don't think many other people would respond though because the truth is above most people's head and sounds un-American. I assure you I am very American and Patriotic.

    -- Posted by sui on Sat, Oct 24, 2015, at 4:36 PM
  • sui (aka unique lies),

    Please.....please put down the crack pipe.

    -- Posted by Blessed Assurance on Sat, Oct 24, 2015, at 5:49 PM
  • *


    Don't underestimate the lefties. They don't care about the truth and they either don't know or don't care about what is above their heads. You can bet that RV, LBR?, and a few others with be on there spewing their crazy take on things.


    It is amazing you can put words together to sound like real sentences since you don't seem to be able to read. If you saw the hearings you would have seen slick hilly's emails where she was telling her kid the truth while at the same time was lying to the victims' families and us. You don't consider that wrong? Just because it isn't in the official record doesn't mean the boots on the ground were not ordered to not respond. Thankfully they responded anyway. It may have been unnecessary tho if clinton had bothered to respond to any of the several hundred requests for increased security. But, like she said--it wasn't her job!?!? I guess her explanation makes sense that he was a big boy and knew what he was getting into. Must have been his fault. Like when women get assaulted because their skirt is too short.

    -- Posted by fair share on Sat, Oct 24, 2015, at 6:23 PM
  • *

    fair share;

    They don't bother me. I know what I am doing and all their answers just shows me that they don't know as much as they think they do. I try to change the way they think, but to no avail. You just can't fix STUPID!

    I know there are two sets of laws in this Country and which one applies to me. I am ahead of the game, so their answers don't change my life.

    I only tell the things that I do to help people who want to help themselves learn a few new things that could make their life easier. For example learn all you can about sui juris!

    -- Posted by sui on Sat, Oct 24, 2015, at 7:39 PM
  • Carl, thank you for clarifying why you do not post here anymore.

    Since I have become, by default, a rare active blogger other than the occasional T-G folk, I feel it is important to offer a forum to our readers who have shown enough interest to be here. They are not all interested in what I am, so......

    I know a few bloggers that have health issues, so I know why they may not be posting, but by no means did I imply that it was because of a diminished in mental capacity. I am surprised you took it that way.

    I also see no issue in stepping out of my comfort zone to post something that others want to discuss. I occasionally explain why I do not participate much on these topics but stepping out tends to broaden my knowledge and encourages me to consider other opinions.

    -- Posted by stevemills on Sat, Oct 24, 2015, at 7:44 PM
  • After watching the Mainstream media coverage of Benghazi, I would say there is a very good chance Hillary will be elected.

    Jim Jordan identified the most significant indictment of Hillary's lies as being a email she sent the day following the attack to the Egyptian prime minister where she said "We know the attack in Libya had nothing to do with the film".

    I have been watching the media reports on this and though they have shown the email sent to Chelsea, they have not shown the one identified by Jordan as the most significant.

    Anyone with common sense should be able to see that this is biased reporting. This is nothing new however, which is why I say there is good chance she will win. With an overwhelmingly biased apologetic media on your side, how can you loose?

    Since Steve copied my link from the other Blog it was broken. Here it is again so you can see the exchange.


    The socialist movement in this country is very strong. Socialism is based on "False Philanthropy and stupid greed". There is an overwhelming abundance of both in todays politicians and electorate.

    -- Posted by Liveforlight on Sun, Oct 25, 2015, at 9:08 AM
  • Sorry for the broken links. I had no idea they would not transfer and will be more careful in the future. (I hope)

    Here is the link to the original post. http://www.t-g.com/blogs/stevemills/entry/63999/ The comments are the last group, so go near the end and you should be able to see them quickly.

    -- Posted by stevemills on Sun, Oct 25, 2015, at 9:58 AM
  • *

    lets be real;

    There you go again talking about a Faux talk show pretend news!

    That doesn't make any sense to me at all.

    As a democrat you wouldn't watch Fox News so where did you hear all that crap?

    Again as I have always said, you can't stop and think for yourself so you heard some other far left news media talk show tell you what to say!

    Let me say it again! I don't listen to the host of the news telling me his/her opinion. I listen to the news and decide for myself what has happened. You see I use my common sense to find out what happened. Some things we will never know.

    AND you can never trust the first report about anything.

    While you are investigating the Heroes that were on the Republican, Hannity, extreme right wing liar, Faux talk show pretend news, let me know what you found out. You couldn't even figure out what was true and what was a lie in the Hillary investigations, so how can I be sure you would be able to investigate something that simple?

    I don't think Hillary even knows for sure what was the truth and what was a lie. She had to tell the truth to many, but chose to tell lies to the people.

    Hillary said there was no order from anyone to stand down, yet the 3 men said there was and they would know because they where the men who were told to stand down.

    Is your investigation team the host of a MSNBC News show? It would have to be someone you can get the left wing answer from.

    Not only did Hannity not believe Obama got re-elected, but so did thousands of other republicans. Obama was put back in office by the powers to be. There was tampering with the poles and the voters, mural of Obama's face posted on the wall at a voting place and one state didn't have one republican vote (highly unusual) plus there were more votes for Obama than there were voters in other areas.

    It doesn't take a genius to see the voting was rigged.

    To finish my comment I have to say, I do not need any news show to tell me what is the truth and what is a lie. I could see it plainly with my own eyes and ears as Hillary spoke in the investigation. It's just a shame the republicans ignored her lies. There was no punishing for her lies she told. They just acknowledged she was lying.

    That's okay because Mr. Comely is watching everything she says and does. I am waiting for the FBI Investigation to wrap up.

    -- Posted by sui on Sun, Oct 25, 2015, at 1:18 PM
  • Sui Hillary did what you said Bush did. She did what her intelligence advisors told her.The republicans are getting desperate.Rep. Brooks is already talking about impeachment of Clinton on the day she is sworn in and she is not even the nominee yet.In other words undo the will of the people's choice.Sounds like dictatorship to me.Come December Trump will be dumped.

    -- Posted by lets be real on Sun, Oct 25, 2015, at 1:27 PM
  • *


    I know that Hillary Clinton will be Nominated but hopefully she will not be elected as our President.

    Hillary's opponents all conceded to her in their very first debate. No one debated anything! They all just praised Hillary and gave all their voters to Hillary Clinton.

    If Hillary doesn't get Nominated I will be shocked because she isn't running against democrats.

    Now when it comes to the election, who knows?

    My money is on Trump because he is the best choice of everyone, democrat or republican.

    Ben Carson won't be much of a challenge to Trump because Ole Ben is a Doctor and took an oath to save lives. He is against Abortions so he would have to be against the Planned Parenthood. That is going to cost him a lot of female votes.

    Trump on the other hand isn't afraid of anyone and has the information he need to go after anyone including Hillary Clinton. Hillary is no stranger to Trump. He knows more thing about Hillary than the public knows.

    Trump is an expert on Contracts and that is how the world runs. Everything is contracts in the world today!

    A One World Order (of Contracts). A One World Government (of Contracts).

    Who better to Guide, Rebuild and Lead our Country back to become the #1 World Leader - USA than Donald Trump.

    Hillary will lead our Country into chaos in every Country she takes us in, then lie about the State of the Union! She doesn't know anything about business Contracts and Responsibilities. If you listened to Hillary's testimony she confessed that she even told Obama what to do. Then after Obama done it, he had to admit it was a failure or had to lie about it.

    Here is my prediction; If Trump is elected, the powers to be will NOT allow Donald Trump to bring our Country out of the slump we are in.

    That would anger the World Bankers who own the world. They would lose billions of dollars if Trump pulled us out of the hole we're in and made this a financially secure Country.

    Trump would make the Powers-to-be angry if he tried to unite the people, because the Powers-to-be have spent years dividing the people, so they can control the confused people.

    Trump is in favor of the Right to bear arms and would never take the arms away from the people. Again that would anger the Powers-to-be because they have pushed that agenda on Obama (and Hillary Clinton) every since he was put in office.

    Trumps power to Control other Countries by Contracts bringing money back into these united States of America would upset the Apple Cart the World Bankers and the Powers-to-be had planned for us.

    I can only hope Trump succeeds before they assassinates him. I honestly believe this.

    -- Posted by sui on Sun, Oct 25, 2015, at 2:28 PM
  • *

    lets be real;

    Are you saying that Hillary had "Intelligence Advisors" that told her that Ambassador Stephens has sent her 600 emails and not to read them or ignore them after she read them since Stephens was suppose to send her classified emails telling her what was going on in Benghazi?

    Or are you saying her "Intelligence Advisors" told her how to lie when asked questions or answer something else that had nothing to do with the question asked?

    I personally do not believe there are that many brain dead people in America who would vote for a liar to be our president. But then again we had enough Brain Dead people to vote for Obama. (Twice).

    Here is how it works, Obama has invited millions of undocumented immigrants into our Country so they would vote for the democrats who have the power to give then entitlements and immunity from prosecution for breaking American laws.

    You don't see that as rigging the election.

    -- Posted by sui on Sun, Oct 25, 2015, at 2:46 PM
  • *

    Don't forget the people that get on tv and brag about how many times they voted for obumer. But they don't really need people to do that when they have the Black Panthers patrolling the voting booths.

    I was unaware Bush was advised to tell his family the truth while lying to the citizens. I guess I need to start watching bsnbc.

    -- Posted by fair share on Sun, Oct 25, 2015, at 5:28 PM
  • Steve....I don't understand why you feel compelled to offer a voice to those who have not the chutzpah to simply approach the Times Gazette and ask to become a blogger like you and I did. In any case I admire your interests and although I don't participate in your blogs usually, I do read them but have not the interest nor knowledge to intelligently comment in most cases.

    Sui....I find your insistence on anonymity because there are too many "Quackos" out there very telling. I have never felt the need to fear such people as they are all cowards. I don't find such a position a positive character trait since you obviously have no compunction exposing Steve and myself to such people.

    How one can expect anyone to respect the opinions of a person who must hide behind a crass invisible avatar to state what they believe, is beyond my abilities to comprehend. Again, not a desirable character trait. I find it hard to believe that you or RV or LBR, et al, would say the things you say in the same way if you were face-to-face in public with me or anyone else.

    -- Posted by cmcclanahan on Sun, Oct 25, 2015, at 6:52 PM
  • *

    This is for you, cmcclanahan;

    Not all cowards are cowards when backed in a corner. Some may become scared wild men that lose control if they are forced to engage in a fight.

    Yes, we can talk on a blog without fiscally fighting by exchanging our FREEDOM OF THE PRESS! In this Country we do have the unalienable right to say anything we like as long as we don't injure anyone with our speech.

    The Color of Law teaches that federal citizens can peacefully assemble if we get a permit first (no where will you find that in our Bill of Rights), and federal citizens have the right to speak as long as it doesn't encourage someone to commit a crime (not in the Bill of Rights).

    The "Black Lives Matter Movement" violates both the Color of Law and The Supreme Law of the Land because they not only protest, but Riot to encourage others to Kill Law Enforcement Officers. There is nothing Constitutional about that!

    The "Black Lives Matter Movement" should all be rounded up and jailed for conspiring to commit Murder.

    cmcclanahan, you posted a lot of Constitutional and legal comments on your blogs, so you should be able to agree with this.

    However, that is just like NOT prosecuting Hillary for not sending help to her employees in Benghazi after receiving 600 emails asking for Military Help.

    The Democrats and Republicans think the Benghazi Investigations are over now. They are Not! They are just beginning now because the committee now has thousands of new emails that they haven't even had time to read yet. This investigation will continue on for months if not years.

    I see you have no problem spiting out big VERY DISRESPECTFUL words like "crass invisible avatar" when you don't know any thing about me or any of the other bloggers including the nameless bloggers on YOUR Blogs. So you post a photo of someone and go by the name of Carl McClanahan that doesn't ring any bells to me. You could be a Judge, Lawyer, Preacher or Funeral Home Director. Doesn't matter to me. I can only go by what you put in print. If I agree I may tell you and if I don't I will oppose your comment or add to it.

    I thought you would be a very intelligent person that I would like to read and post on your blogs. You show just as much disrespect for me as I show to people I call Brain Dead, so you are in the same boat with the rest of us, like it or not.

    You didn't list all the other bloggers who only have to sign in with a username and password. According to your Very Disrespectful description of Me you are including everyone else who isn't using their real name and address. Like Hillary said yesterday, I don't care what you say about me, but I won't listen to you disrespecting all the others who make the blogs an interesting form of communicating.

    I didn't go to college but that doesn't bother me because I know I am intelligent. I am so intelligent that I don't mind telling you that a college student only knows what he has been taught in college. I know what I have taught myself over the years. Law school (no matter how many years you go) is a laugh because you only learn the color of law which is actually unlawful.

    If you have read any of my comments and I am sure you have, I have no reason to lie. I will tell anyone the way I see it and what I believe. I do make mistakes, but if I didn't, I wouldn't be here and as one man pointed out I misspell words sometime. I use the spell checker to keep most of the mistakes down but I've been known to use the wrong word even thou it is spelled right.

    I am not on these blogs to make friends nor enemies. If I like a topic I will jump in if I think I can add to it, otherwise I stay off of it. I like a challenge and I like to get my two cents worth in.

    Steve knows how to run a blog and will relocate a blog if he thinks it needs to be by itself, Steve has the longest blogs and the most read blogs (I can't prove that but I bet it's true).

    -- Posted by sui on Mon, Oct 26, 2015, at 12:14 AM
  • I watched a Ben Carson interview the other day and realized the man is mixed up in the head.What he said about abortions compared to slavemasters made no sense.I never thought I would see the day when americans would support a reality show host and someone one who attempted to stab someone for president.If Obama had the violent back ground that Carson had as a teenager these same supporters would label him a THUG.I think he is on medication for this since he appears drowsy.

    -- Posted by lets be real on Tue, Oct 27, 2015, at 2:29 PM
  • You have to hand it to Ben Carson thou....he has made us ask ourselves some serious questions, like.."Have we completely overestimated the intelligence of brain surgeons?"

    -- Posted by Rocket Valentine on Tue, Oct 27, 2015, at 7:27 PM
  • Sui, yes I can read, and more to the point I can read law, as apparently you cannot.

    28 USC 3002 part 15 does not say the US is a foreign corporation or any corporation.

    It says:

    (15) "United States" means--

    (A) a Federal corporation;

    (B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or

    (C) an instrumentality of the United States.

    All that does is give US jurisdiction over corporations so that US laws still apply to them.

    My advice is to stop believing all the sovereign citizen crap and speak to an actual lawyer about these things and he/she will quickly tell you how foolish these ideas are.

    If there is any doubt, how many of these sovereign citizens win their cases in court? How many effectively void a contract by signing in red ink?

    Yes there are problems with our country, but spouting this nonsense makes people ignore you, even if you later have legitimate points to make.

    -- Posted by quietmike on Tue, Oct 27, 2015, at 7:45 PM
  • *

    Well, now there you go! A black man talking about Women having an abortion is like Slavery.

    No one has said a word about that being Racist!

    Also the women who are suppose to be demanding equal rights with men have said nothing about being compared to slave masters, not even lets be real.

    Where is the outrage?

    So now, Carson has called women who have abortions Slave Masters and the women love him. He has also profiled Women as being the only Slave Masters today because we don't have any slaves today!

    However Ben Carson has just created Slaves in all the states by saying babies are slaves that can be treated any way the mother wants to treat it even by killing it as a Slave master.

    So now...

    There is not one republican candidate that comes close to knowing how to run the country better than Trump.

    Trump will be the Republican Nominee and Hillary will be the Democratic Nominee.

    It will be between Trump and Hillary.

    But here's the reality of it all. There are only 538 people who will be voting the President in Office.

    As for Your man, Barack Obama, he is fixing to send boots on the ground, not in Iraq where the bulk of Isis is, but in Syria where Putin is bombing all the Rebels and Training Teams. Obama said he was going to keep training the Rebels. Where is he going to get more rebels? Putin is bombing all of them he can find and will bomb every American Soldier in Syria because Obama is sending them there to oust Assad.

    Putin is not going to allow this, so Obama will have to shoot down Russian fighter planes to protect our troops on the ground.

    The question is... Will and Can Obama do this? He hasn't done it so far. Looks very Bad to me.

    Of course, if we lose all our troops on the ground, President Killary Clinton will send in another batch of troops to be killed by Putin after she pushes the red reset button.

    -- Posted by sui on Tue, Oct 27, 2015, at 8:10 PM
  • *

    I wish LBR? and RV would quit spewing their racial hatred by saying bad things about Carson. Don't they realize he is black? We have learned over the past 8 years that if we say anything at all bad about b o it is racist no matter how true it is.

    Speaking of b o, looks like he is turning into quite the warmonger. What happened to " no American boots on the ground"? And now it looks like he is asking for a beatdown from China. If he backs down from his pink line in the sand in Syria, what makes him think China won't slap him?

    -- Posted by fair share on Tue, Oct 27, 2015, at 9:47 PM
  • Ben Carson, is a psychopath. He wanted to cut someone up as a teenager, so he was bright enough to get a license to do it as a brain surgeon, Cut cut cut...

    -- Posted by Evil Monkey on Wed, Oct 28, 2015, at 9:12 AM
  • Wow! I do not believe it. Ben Carson should be a poster child for the Liberals. He's black, grew up in a tough city environment, had a violent youth yet transformed himself into a quiet spoken, gifted surgeon.

    Oops. He made the mistake of mentioning in his book that he changed as he began reading the "Book of Proverbs" and applying those lessons. He believes in God and applies lessons from religious books? Curses!

    Oh, and he doesn't agree with the Liberal agenda so, now he is a violent psychopath?

    You've got to be kidding!

    -- Posted by Timeline on Wed, Oct 28, 2015, at 9:38 AM
  • *

    Leave poor Ole Ben alone. He has enough to deal with on the abortion remarks he made and the Slavery comment he made about women. Of course being black it won't be called Racism.

    There is a big difference in attempting to stab someone and stabbing them. Right off the top of my head I would say no time or up to Life.

    -- Posted by sui on Wed, Oct 28, 2015, at 11:06 AM
  • Sui you need to look up Carsons remarks on abortions.He stated"During slavery, masters thought they had the right to do what ever they wanted with slaves,and what if the abolitionists said I don't believe in slavery but you guys do whatever you want".This makes no sense.A woman making a decision for herself is not the same as a slave master enslaving others.If this remark was racist,Carson said it I didn't.How do the retired folks on this blog fell about him saying he would abolish medicare?I still want someone to explain why he is so drowsy and cant keep his eyes open.If he is on tranquilizers or have a health issue the country needs to know. And as for Trump did anyone see him begging the people of Iowa to get his poll numbers up? He told them to get their a***s in gear.Is this presidential material?

    -- Posted by lets be real on Wed, Oct 28, 2015, at 12:02 PM
  • Sui so it is ok for Carson to attempt to stab someone. The only thing that prevented the knife from penetrating was the boys belt buckle.What about the other violent teenage behavior he referred to.Do you consider attempted murder with a knive not a crime or does it depend on who does it?

    -- Posted by lets be real on Wed, Oct 28, 2015, at 12:15 PM
  • *


    What is the difference between a master killing a slave and a "mother" killing her unborn child?


    I would like to add another disqualifier Carson has for being a left wing democratic poster child. He became successful and is taking care of himself and his family. He is not living off the taxpayer. How dare he?

    -- Posted by fair share on Wed, Oct 28, 2015, at 12:23 PM
  • Fair share did you ever hear of a thing called CHOICE, that's the difference.I am sure Carson took advantage of all the government assisted programs while in college just like all the other underprivileged students,that you call free stuff.

    -- Posted by lets be real on Wed, Oct 28, 2015, at 12:43 PM
  • *

    You must be referring to the masters CHOICE to kill his slave? I have no idea what "free stuff" you are talking about. I pay taxes so I KNOW its not free. FREE is a libtard misconception.

    -- Posted by fair share on Wed, Oct 28, 2015, at 1:03 PM
  • *


    Re-read your own comment. In your fifth line down 28 USC 3002 part 15 (A) it states "a Federal corporation".

    So it does say the US is a corporation like I said. I also said it was a Foreign corporation so...

    Volume 20: Corpus Juris Sec. §1785:

    "The United States Government is a Foreign Corporation with respect to a state" NY re: Merriam 36 N.E. 505 1441 S.Ct.1973, 41 L.Ed.287

    Proof that the US Government is a Foreign Corporation and does not apply in the states!

    "It is a well established principle of law that all federal legislation applies only within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States unless a contrary intent appears."

    Foley Brothers, Inc. v. Filardo 336, U.S. 281 (1948)

    Where is this federal territorial jurisdiction? Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 of the US Constitution

    To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings;

    This is plain to see it is Washington, DC, because it is not part of any State. It is a territory and foreign to the 50 states.

    There is in our Political System, [two governments] a government of the several states AND a government of the United States. Each is distinct from the other and has citizens of its own." - U.S. v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542, 23 L. Ed 588

    [The citizens of the United States are 14th Amendment citizens.] The U.S. Government can assume everyone is a 14th Amendment citizen for the purpose of charging them with crimes. If you don't know you are not a US Citizen, then you can be tried.

    "It is an elementary rule of pleading, that a plea to the jurisdiction is...a tacit admission that the court has a right to judge in the case, and is a waiver to all exceptions to the jurisdiction."

    Girty v. Logan, 6 Bush Ky. 8

    "It is the doctrine of the common law, that a Sovereign cannot be sued in his own court without his consent." The Siren vs U.S. 74 U.S. 152

    Proof that all laws (local and International) is the law of contracts. The main reason for electing Donald Trump as the new President of the US.

    I have talked to lawyers and they don't know anything about Common Law and if they use it they would be disbarred from the ABA.

    I told one lawyer that if I understood the law and the Trading with the enemy act, 99% of all contracts are null and void. He agreed but wouldn't talk about it.

    I also asked a lawyer that the courts have to prove there was a crime and there was an Intent to commit the crime before you can be tried. He told me that the law was changed and that no longer applied. I saw it being used just the other day proving my knowledge of the law was correct.

    I also asked two contract lawyers (one a federal lawyer) about a contract situation. Both lawyers told me they didn't know and would have to look it up. Never heard from them again.

    You are right when you said All that does is give US Jurisdiction over corporations so US law still applies to them.

    The US is a Corporation and only has jurisdiction over other corporations that it creates, but doesn't have jurisdiction over a living man or woman. You must give them consent to try you in their Corporate court. It is so easy for them to do this if you don't know the law. The American Bar Association has changed the meaning of everyday words so when you speak them you are confessing to the crime, etc..

    Red ink doesn't void a contract. There are simple ways to void a contract. The UCC says you have 3 days to rescind your signature on any contract, so basically no contract is valid for the first 3 days. The best way is to reserve your rights on everything you sign, even your checks. How do you reserve your rights? That takes years to discover, because it is so simple you wouldn't believe it.

    A court hearing can be stopped without ever going to court. It freezes the case forever. What is it? you have to be a sovereign to use it.

    Most sovereigns go to jail or prison because they don't know how to stop the Trust. (Court Case)

    Every case is a trust created by the court clerk. You are being tried under contract law. How can anyone defend themselves when they don't even know they are in court under contract law involving a Trust?

    I shut down two lawyers coming after me over a debt collection in the amount smaller than $300 by requesting proof that I owed the debt to them. I demanded they send me certain documents proving I owed the debt or they would have be liable for paying me money.

    I turned their contract around and created a contract with them for documents they couldn't provide. When they couldn't provide the documents, they lost any authority to come after me. If they did they were agreeing to pay me $100 for every contact they made to me in writing and $1,000 if they called me.

    They were very smart and dropped their attack against me. I never heard from them again.

    A credit card company came after me! After a few letters they filed a petition with the Bedford County Court to extend the contract for another 10 years.

    I put the Court paper in my printer and printed a small 3" x 5" Notice on the court papers and printed an extra copy to send to the Credit Card Company lawyers and to return to the court.

    I informed the Credit Card Company Lawyers that 1 of 3 things would now happen. Since there was a case number I knew a Trust had been created in the name of the DEFENDANT (a corporation) and it would be in the amount of the money asking price of Approx. $5,000.00. That means $5,000.00 was debited from that trust to be paid by me if I went to court. Instead I sent the court papers back registered, return receipt requested. (Proof I was not a Corporation)

    So the Court Clerk has appointed the Judge as the Trustee, Me as the beneficiary, and the prosecutor or lawyer bringing the charge as the executor.

    That means that

    1.) either the Prosecutor who created the amount would have to replace the money in the Trust debited,

    2,) or the Credit Card Company Lawyer would have to pay it from his pocket.

    I explained to the lawyer that I would assume HE would have to pay what he was expecting to get from me to cover the debit. or....

    3.) The court would have to dismiss the case immediately.

    I froze the case and I have never heard another word from those lawyers or the Credit Card Company. I assume the court dismissed the case so it didn't have to prove to anyone what was going on and that there was a trust created and charged and money credited back into the trust.

    Now you can see why so many sovereigns go to jail or lose their case. They just aren't informed enough to fight the oourt system.

    The US is a Corporation and only has jurisdiction over other corporations that it creates, but doesn't have jurisdiction over a living man or woman. You must give them consent to try you in their Corporate court. It is so easy for them to do this if you don't know the law.

    Congress has created Corporations in every State as well so they can reach into the states with their power to legislate for the 14th amendment citizens (you if you don't know?)

    -- Posted by sui on Wed, Oct 28, 2015, at 1:39 PM
  • It's obvious you don't know how to read law.

    The lawyers probably didn't answer your questions because everyone recognizes the sovereign citizen crowd is a collection of moonbats.

    -- Posted by quietmike on Wed, Oct 28, 2015, at 2:20 PM
  • *

    lets be real;

    Ben Carson was referring to the women as Slave Master in that they could decide what to do with their babies. To Kill or not to kill them, that is the question. Ben was saying a woman can make the decision to kill the baby or not.

    He compared that authority women have to that of a slave master to do whatever he wanted to do to his slaves.

    So in reality he was comparing Women to Slave Owners. That is disrespectful to women everywhere and to imply women were like Slave Masters would make it Racism.

    The woman is not making the decision for herself. She has a baby's life to consider. When she chooses an abortion she has deciding to kill the baby without he baby's input, just like a Slave Master made the decision about what to do with his slaves.

    If Trump wants the Iowa votes he better do a lot of begging. That is what Candidates do if they want to get elected, they don't say if you want Trump then vote for him.

    When we were young we did a lot of things we won't do now that we know better. Also there was the intent to commit a crime but because the knife didn't penetrate the belt buckle, no crime was really committed. Only an attempt. That could be a crime under the color of law. If he stabbed someone's belt buckle, what was he attempting to kill? Was it a pregnant woman?

    Isn't that what women do when they have an abortion? Have the fetus killed with a knife or do you want to admit that the Planned Parenthood kept the babies alive until they could harvest their brain?

    So in your own words you want me to believe that attempting to stab someone in their belt buckle is a crime but killing fetuses isn't murder?

    -- Posted by sui on Wed, Oct 28, 2015, at 3:57 PM
  • *

    Aaah, your probably right quietmike!

    I will just have to keep on believing I know what I am talking about, because the IRS told me I had 60 days to petition the tax court.

    -- Posted by sui on Wed, Oct 28, 2015, at 4:07 PM
  • *

    No doubt about it, the left-wingers are racist. b o can't make a mistake BECAUSE he is black? As far as abortion being racist, I'm sure a lot of babies are killed because their slut mamas that use it for birth control choose not to have a bi-racial child. How sad. What would the world be like if all lives mattered?

    -- Posted by fair share on Wed, Oct 28, 2015, at 4:31 PM
  • All types of women have abortions rich,poor, all colors and married for all types of reasons.It is not only as you say" slut mamas who choose not to have a bi-racial child".It could even be your daughter.

    -- Posted by lets be real on Wed, Oct 28, 2015, at 5:02 PM
  • *


    I forgot to tell you, the IRS told me I had 60 days to petition the Tax Court 3 different times.

    That was like 15 years ago! I guess they are still waiting for me to petition the Tax Court.

    Not really, I had the IRS send me requests for money from Florida, two places in Georgia, from Louisiana, Missouri and from the District Director in Nashville, TN then from the collection department in Memphis, TN.. They stop bothering me when I told them I had no reportable income from a trade or business with-in the United States.

    A trade or business in the Internal Revenue Service means a Government Official, Officer or employee or Gov. contractor. With-in the United States means in Washington, DC or a US Territory.

    -- Posted by sui on Wed, Oct 28, 2015, at 7:29 PM
  • *


    If you got a math major you really need to get your money back. I said "a lot". Not all. But at least we seem to agree that some abortion is due to the slut mamas that choose not to have bi-racial children. Maybe we even agree that abortion is racist.

    -- Posted by fair share on Wed, Oct 28, 2015, at 10:46 PM
  • *

    Now they are thinking that women have been aborting too many babies that could have grown up to pay into their Baby Boomer Grand Parents Social Security.

    -- Posted by sui on Thu, Oct 29, 2015, at 5:31 PM
  • Fair share you and I don't agree on anything.Since you brought skin color into this what does abortions have to do with color?For all the ones who want to defund Planned Parenthood,that provides contraceptive,there will be more unwanted children born.Then these same people will complain about feeding them.Back to Benghazi,the hearing boosted Hillary,s poll numbers.She was the adult in the room,the rest looked like angry old men.Hillary is gaining and Trump is loosing his fizzle.How can Carson be president when he doesn't even know the constitution and can't separate church and state.Whoever the republican nominee will be will lose against Hillary in the general election.She will have the support of the blacks,latinos and women.Fiorina stated she wants to debate Hillary,she needs to save her money and go home.America doesn't want that angry/cold woman as president.

    -- Posted by lets be real on Fri, Oct 30, 2015, at 1:30 PM
  • *

    Wow ! Being racist and anti-feminist in the same post! I'm impressed! Let women kill their unborn children for whatever reason, even the race of their father-to-be, they can't get birth control from their primary care provider (which they can keep if they like). I have already asked you to please not say racist stuff about Dr Carson just because he is black! Even if you don't agree with me that some slut momas abort their children because of the race of the father, I assume that you agree with me that slick hilly won the hearing. We may however disagree what that means. I think it says a lot more about the people that don't care that she lied than anything else.

    -- Posted by fair share on Fri, Oct 30, 2015, at 3:43 PM
  • *

    Speaking of slick hilly, considering what she put up with from slick willy, I wonder what she will put up with for the country. At least b o is now putting boots on the ground (despite repeatedly saying he would not). He really should go back and study the Vietnam war. If you are going to do something, do it. Just don't do it half-a@@!

    -- Posted by fair share on Fri, Oct 30, 2015, at 4:14 PM
  • *

    Speaking of slick hilly, I wonder with what she put up with from slick willy, what will she put up with for us as a country? Speaking of putting up with stuff, looks like b o isn't sticking to his pledge of "no boots on the ground". He needs to go back and study the Vietnam war. If you want to stick your nose into it, do it all the way. If you are only going to be half-@ss, you will be no

    -- Posted by fair share on Fri, Oct 30, 2015, at 4:18 PM
  • *

    Sorry about the double post--computer malfunction. Is it time for a 2nd republican debate blog?

    -- Posted by fair share on Fri, Oct 30, 2015, at 4:35 PM
  • Fair share what did I say racist about Carson and what was anti-feminist?You are the only one that brought up color in this conversation.Carson's race does not matter to me.The man rambles and has terrible ideas that are as bad as his wife singing the National Anthem.Some time the truth hurts.Have you ever seen Fiorina smile,the woman looks as if she is in pain.

    -- Posted by lets be real on Fri, Oct 30, 2015, at 6:04 PM
  • *

    Racist--you say bad stuff about Carson.

    Anti-feminist-- saying bad stuff about Fiorina.

    I have learned a lot from the PC. crowd.

    -- Posted by fair share on Fri, Oct 30, 2015, at 6:48 PM
  • OK. I will do a Republican's continued post wit a link back to the original.

    -- Posted by stevemills on Fri, Oct 30, 2015, at 7:42 PM
Respond to this blog

Posting a comment requires free registration: